Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's the problem here? She looks fantastic in the dress.
High-Schooler Told to Cover Up for Exposing Her Shoulder
What's the problem here? She looks fantastic in the dress.
High-Schooler Told to Cover Up for Exposing Her Shoulder
If she covered her shoulders and exposed her boobs they would have given her an award for being "liberated."
Not in Utah.
I wouldn't have thought that they would suck up to the gay activists but that's exactly what they're doing so I guess they've become "enlightened" to the new age agenda.
More and more people will become accepting quite frankly because as more people come out to their families, families will call for more acceptance on the matter. Most people are protective of their family members and most people want their family members to be treated well in society.
I Know you don't like gay people, I am not sure why it bothers you so much.
Just like terrorism and nuclear war.White people problems.
What's the problem here? She looks fantastic in the dress.
High-Schooler Told to Cover Up for Exposing Her Shoulder
If she covered her shoulders and exposed her boobs they would have given her an award for being "liberated."
Not in Utah.
I wouldn't have thought that they would suck up to the gay activists but that's exactly what they're doing so I guess they've become "enlightened" to the new age agenda.
More and more people will become accepting quite frankly because as more people come out to their families, families will call for more acceptance on the matter. Most people are protective of their family members and most people want their family members to be treated well in society.
I Know you don't like gay people, I am not sure why it bothers you so much.
I don't give two hoots about queers one way or the other. It's the aggressive gay agenda and their insistence that I see homosexuality as somehow "normal" that I have a problem with. If they want to pass AIDS back and forth in the privacy of their own home I really couldn't care less.
Utah is 86% white, 62% Mormon, mostly Republican and very conservative. Lots of survivalists too. I've been there once. Not a place I would ever want to live. Suffocating is what I'd call it. Cold, mean and suffocating.Her dress doesn't appear too provocative to me, so why does Utah still cling to these old fashion strictness?
I think they are wrong for having embarrassed the young teen and made her feel ashamed for wearing such a beautiful and certainly respectable dress....
What's wrong with some people?
Utah girl, 15, forced to wear a coat to school dance because teachers felt THIS dress was indecent for showing too much shoulder
Lone Peak girl had to wear coat to school dance as teachers felt dress was indecent Daily Mail Online
The Citadel Idaho Survivalist Town Proposed By Gun Company Looks To Break Tradition Of FailureThe Citadel, Idaho Survivalist Town Proposed By Gun Company, Looks To Break Tradition Of Failure..........A group of survivalists wants to build a giant walled fortress in the woods of the Idaho Panhandle, a medieval-style city where residents would be required to own weapons and stand ready to defend the compound if society collapses.
Yea these hicks need to get with the times. I am pretty sure the US fought World War Two for the right to abolish school dress codes. Didn't Martin Luther King have a section about permitting two inch shoulder straps in his "I have a dream speech"?A dress code is one thing.The dress the young lady is wearing would be proper in the 1950s. It is not provocative or suggestive in any way.
Your post is just totally idiotic. Get a life. My God! You are bringing in gay and lesbians into this discussion, WWII, MLK....you're sound like a nut case. Say something sensible. Are you 80? Do you think young girls in 2015 should dress like they did 65 years ago? Do you dress like men did in the 50s? Do you wear slacks, a white shirt, and a suit coat every day? Because that is what most men wore in the 50s.Yea these hicks need to get with the times. I am pretty sure the US fought World War Two for the right to abolish school dress codes. Didn't Martin Luther King have a section about permitting two inch shoulder straps in his "I have a dream speech"?A dress code is one thing.The dress the young lady is wearing would be proper in the 1950s. It is not provocative or suggestive in any way.
If this isn't oppression, I don't know what is. Can legal charges be filed?
LOL. I like how you treat political and moral issues like it is a fashion trend. "OMG dress codes are SOOO 1950". Yea, what a convincing case.Your post is just totally idiotic. Get a life. My God! You are bringing in gay and lesbians into this discussion, WWII, MLK....you're sound like a nut case. Say something sensible. Are you 80? Do you think young girls in 2015 should dress like they did 65 years ago? Do you dress like men did in the 50s? Do you wear slacks, a white shirt, and a suit coat every day? Because that is what most men wore in the 50s.Yea these hicks need to get with the times. I am pretty sure the US fought World War Two for the right to abolish school dress codes. Didn't Martin Luther King have a section about permitting two inch shoulder straps in his "I have a dream speech"?A dress code is one thing.The dress the young lady is wearing would be proper in the 1950s. It is not provocative or suggestive in any way.
If this isn't oppression, I don't know what is. Can legal charges be filed?
I did not say a word about dress codes being passe. I said that the dress in question is suitable for 65 years ago. Don't put words in my mouth. As the OP stated in the thread title, the dress code in this case is BACKWARD, goes back to the 50s, which is ridiculous 65 years later. And you think what a woman wears is a political and moral issue?LOL. I like how you treat political and moral issues like it is a fashion trend. "OMG dress codes are SOOO 1950". Yea, what a convincing case.Your post is just totally idiotic. Get a life. My God! You are bringing in gay and lesbians into this discussion, WWII, MLK....you're sound like a nut case. Say something sensible. Are you 80? Do you think young girls in 2015 should dress like they did 65 years ago? Do you dress like men did in the 50s? Do you wear slacks, a white shirt, and a suit coat every day? Because that is what most men wore in the 50s.Yea these hicks need to get with the times. I am pretty sure the US fought World War Two for the right to abolish school dress codes. Didn't Martin Luther King have a section about permitting two inch shoulder straps in his "I have a dream speech"?A dress code is one thing.The dress the young lady is wearing would be proper in the 1950s. It is not provocative or suggestive in any way.
If this isn't oppression, I don't know what is. Can legal charges be filed?
Why don't you tell me more?
You liberal self-righteous busybodies were the ones that made it a political and moral issue by suggesting clearly defined dress codes are, "OMG sexism, what a setback for women's rights! we aren't sex objects, something must be done!".I did not say a word about dress codes being passe. I said that the dress in question is suitable for 65 years ago. Don't put words in my mouth. As the OP stated in the thread title, the dress code in this case is BACKWARD, goes back to the 50s, which is ridiculous 65 years later. And you think what a woman wears is a political and moral issue? You are one of those backward men who think women should not have a say in what they wear, presumabley.LOL. I like how you treat political and moral issues like it is a fashion trend. "OMG dress codes are SOOO 1950". Yea, what a convincing case.Your post is just totally idiotic. Get a life. My God! You are bringing in gay and lesbians into this discussion, WWII, MLK....you're sound like a nut case. Say something sensible. Are you 80? Do you think young girls in 2015 should dress like they did 65 years ago? Do you dress like men did in the 50s? Do you wear slacks, a white shirt, and a suit coat every day? Because that is what most men wore in the 50s.Yea these hicks need to get with the times. I am pretty sure the US fought World War Two for the right to abolish school dress codes. Didn't Martin Luther King have a section about permitting two inch shoulder straps in his "I have a dream speech"?A dress code is one thing.The dress the young lady is wearing would be proper in the 1950s. It is not provocative or suggestive in any way.
If this isn't oppression, I don't know what is. Can legal charges be filed?
Why don't you tell me more?