USA vs. Iran...Tale of the Tape...How do Military Forces Stack-Up

[BasicHumanUnit]

United States would stomp Persian ass.

But.....
You miss the bigger picture.

It would NOT be USA vs Iran.....

It will be USA vs Iran + Russia + China

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Channeling Neville Chamberlain, dumbass? I spent more time on the shitter in the military than you have served at all!

Bragging about it incessantly is not a badge of honor. Just sayin.

 

[JimBowie1958]

It would NOT be USA vs Iran.....
It will be USA vs Iran + Russia + China

Why do you think Russia and China are suicidal?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Channeling Neville Chamberlain, dumbass? I spent more time on the shitter in the military than you have served at all!

Bragging about it incessantly is not a badge of honor. Just sayin.

lol, you are a confused little boy, doofus.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

It would NOT be USA vs Iran.....
It will be USA vs Iran + Russia + China

Why do you think Russia and China are suicidal?

You fail to comprehend or understand the scope of what I said.
I din't say they would attack us militarily. Although that isn't out of the question. China is already fuming with the USA.

If you had grasped the meaning, it meant that both China AND Russia will interfere in any way possible.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

lol, you are a confused little boy, doofus.

ok. Want to explain what REALLY has your panties in a wad?
Be a man....let's hear it. This is not the first time you strike out limp wristedly from the protection of the shadows.
I doubt you are brave enough.

Instead you'll continue the pansy little girl slaps from behind mommies skirt.

Coward.

 

[Zorro!]

YES, WE CAN

When Iranian-backed militias attacked the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, Ayatollah Khamanei reportedly boasted that America “cannot do a damn thing” about it. This harked back to America’s failed effort in 1979 to rescue hostages Iran held. During a demonstration in Tehran following that fiasco, one of the signs said, “America can’t do anything.”

All nations respect nations that can do things — in other words, nations that effectively wield power. They tend to view nations that can’t with contempt.

Iran is particularly impressed by the effective wielding of power. At the beginning of World War II, the then-Shah (father of the one we remember) incurred the displeasure of the British, who thought he was too sympathetic to Germany. The British responded by forcing this powerful dictator to abdicate in favor of his son (the Shah we remember). The old Shah was sent into exile and died during the war.

In the early 1950s, the new Shah appointed the popular Mohammad Mosaddegh as prime minister. Mosaddegh proceeded to nationalize the oil industry, to the chagrin of the British. The British persuaded President Eisenhower to help them oust Mosaddegh. The Shah, who had left for Rome, returned to take back the reins.

These exercises of power made a lasting impression on Iranians. So lasting, that for decades, and long after the sun had set on the British empire, Iranians of a certain age attributed to the British everything important that happened in the Middle East.

A new generation of Iranians formed a very different impression when it came to America. The humiliation the mullahs inflicted on us in 1979 caused them to believe, as that sign said, America can’t do anything.

The overthrow of Saddam Hussein temporarily changed this impression. So much so that, according to our intelligence services, Iran halted its nuclear program. It had seen how America responded to evidence that a hostile power in the region was developing weapons of mass destruction. We could do something big in the region, after all.

Unfortunately, the U.S soon met with serious reversals in Iraq. Thus, Iran’s nuclear program soon was back in business.

Then came the Obama administration. Suddenly, it wasn’t just that America couldn’t do anything to stop Iran. Now, it no longer even wanted to. On the contrary, Obama was prepared to subsidize the regime — to pay it tribute. We had become truly pathetic in the eyes of Iran’s tough-minded rulers.

President Trump quickly reversed course. And now, by effectuating the killing of Gen. Soleimani, he has demonstrated, in a way he hadn’t previously, that the U.S. can some do some impressive military things to Iran, and is willing to do them.

We can take the fight to Iran in ways it cannot take the fight to us.

President Trump will have to keep demonstrating what the U.S. can do to Iran. Iran probably get the message and stop short of forcing Trump to crush the regime.

 

[August West]

Why is it that we`ll go on the warpath over the killing of an American civilian unless that civilian is a journalist for the Washington Post?

 

[fncceo]

United States would stomp Persian ass.

But.....
You miss the bigger picture.

It would NOT be USA vs Iran.....

It will be USA vs Iran + Russia + China

Do you need a place to hide?

 

[toobfreak]

United States would stomp Persian ass.

Iran is smaller than the state of Alaska and we have 54X the military budget. Not TWICE. 54X.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

You do understand Iran is not going to fight us alone and Russia and China will fund them while causing terroristic havoc over here?

Also you do understand Itan has it tentacles around the world with funding of gangs and cartels and will have them cause street violence within our nation??

Iran is not going to play war the way we would like but instead play it like they have in Lebanon and Syria and if you think marching into Iran will be easy then think again and remember the former USSR mistake with Afghanistan and multiple it by ten with Iran...

War should be the last option with those crazy bastards!

 

[sparky]

Do you need a place to hide?

Israel does, behind it's big 'USA stick'

They're in a cold war w/Iran, along w/NK by proxy

and we;re their M.E. b*tch ....

~S~

 

[fncceo]

Do you need a place to hide?

Israel does, behind it's big 'USA stick'

They're in a cold war w/Iran, along w/NK by proxy

and we;re their M.E. b*tch ....

~S~

Oh noes! Joos!

 

[sparky]

~S~

 

[fncceo]

~S~

Glad you're so open about what parts of The Internet you frequent. It makes you so much easier to trace.

 

[Papageorgio]

We have no objective, goal nor are we willing to do what we need to do to win a war. We have no business even thinking about going to war, unless we are prepared to win at all costs and what a clear goal of what a win is.

 

[Bush92]

Why is it that we`ll go on the warpath over the killing of an American civilian unless that civilian is a journalist for the Washington Post?

Terrorists and foreign governments try to avoid killing U.S. media people. Best propaganda they get is from liberal U.S. media. BTW the Washington Post doesn’t have journalist because they do practice journalism. Just propaganda for the Democratic Party.

 

[rightwinger]

United States would stomp Persian ass.

Why do we want to fight Iran?

 

[longly]

Why is it that we`ll go on the warpath over the killing of an American civilian unless that civilian is a journalist for the Washington Post?

The reason for that is that the Saudis are allies that we need and the Iranians are an enemy that we don’t need. Of course the Saudis need us too and our acceptance of alcohol, pornography and homosexuality makes it hard for them to be our ally just as their authoritarianism makes it hard for us to be their ally. But when it comes to allies one can’t afford to be too choosy. Consider WWII the US was allied with one of the worse mass murders in world history.

 

[rightwinger]

Why is it that we`ll go on the warpath over the killing of an American civilian unless that civilian is a journalist for the Washington Post?

The reason for that is that the Saudis are allies that we need and the Iranians are an enemy that we don’t need. Of course the Saudis need us too and our acceptance of alcohol, pornography and homosexuality makes it hard for them to be our ally just as their authoritarianism makes it hard for us to be their ally. But when it comes to allies one can’t afford to be too choosy. Consider WWII the US was allied with one of the worse mass murders in world history.

We don’t need either one