US Needs to Send Ground Troops to Fight ISIS, NOW.

[dilloduck]

There is even less reason to attack ISIS than there was to invade Iraq.

 

[protectionist]

No----there is no reason to spill US blood there. NONE.

There or HERE. I'll choose there.

 

[protectionist]

McConnell announced:

McConnell to CNN Obama would have a lot of congressional support for action against ISIS 8211 CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

Looks like one BIG group now...................................

There was a lot for invading Iraq too.

Which was a good idea. And if we had stayed, all this wouldn't be happening now.

 

[protectionist]

How is ISIS a worse threat to the US than Saddam was ?

You need to watch the news shows more. You're not even in the ballpark.

 

[Peach]

No----there is no reason to spill US blood there. NONE.

There or HERE. I'll choose there.

Agreed, ISIS is real, not a dream of any US politician. I do not think leaving Iraq after nearly a decade was the cause, but that is subject to debate. What ISIS is doing now is not.

 

[protectionist]

If Isis wants war with us. They're welcome to invade.

No they're not. We are not well equipped or set up to repel a 2014 type of invasion. We'd have 9-11s, Boston Marathons, and Fort Hoods going on all over the place, intermixed with suicide bombers, and quite possibly nuclear bombs going off too. You want all that ? Better to obliterate this cancer over in the ME.

 

[dilloduck]

How is ISIS a worse threat to the US than Saddam was ?

You need to watch the news shows more. You're not even in the ballpark.

lay it on me---are they more powerful as an army than the Iraqi's were ? WMDs ??? Oh wait----they are scary cuz they chop off heads.

 

[protectionist]

There is even less reason to attack ISIS than there was to invade Iraq.

Internet forums typically attract know nothings. We've got our share.

 

[dilloduck]

No----there is no reason to spill US blood there. NONE.

There or HERE. I'll choose there.

No----there is no reason to spill US blood there. NONE.

There or HERE. I'll choose there.

WOW this is like Kennedy and Johnson trying to explain why we had to stop communism in Viet Nam.

 

[dilloduck]

There is even less reason to attack ISIS than there was to invade Iraq.

Internet forums typically attract know nothings. We've got our share.

Still no answer-------

 

[protectionist]

How is ISIS a worse threat to the US than Saddam was ?

You need to watch the news shows more. You're not even in the ballpark.

lay it on me---are they more powerful as an army than the Iraqi's were ? WMDs ??? Oh wait----they are scary cuz they chop off heads.

HA HA. You just go answered AND REFUTED in the previous post (# 26). Hopefully, you now know how much you don't know.

 

[protectionist]

No----there is no reason to spill US blood there. NONE.

There or HERE. I'll choose there.

No----there is no reason to spill US blood there. NONE.

There or HERE. I'll choose there.

WOW this is like Kennedy and Johnson trying to explain why we had to stop communism in Viet Nam.

Nothing of the sort. Are you trying to win an IDIOCY AWARD ? Don't know much about Islam do you ?

 

[dilloduck]

So we're going to send our troops to kill every single terrorist in the world so they can't come here ?

 

[protectionist]

US Needs to Send Ground Troops to Fight ISIS, NOW.

Further confirmation that the OP is insane, not that it was ever needed.

The ground troops will be sent, ISIS will be defeated, and the voices like yours that would have caused the annihilation of the US, will be forgotten. Lucky for you.

 

[protectionist]

So we're going to send our troops to kill every single terrorist in the world so they can't come here ?

You're beginning to get the idea (slowly)

 

[dilloduck]

So we're going to send our troops to kill every single terrorist in the world so they can't come here ?

You're beginning to get the idea (slowly)

You're insane

 

[Kondor3]

Why? We will just piss them off and create little bitty ISIS's all over the world.

Better, perhaps, than one big ISIS, unchallenged for lack of balls, which grows into something which cannot be stopped. Think "Iran", with the military competency of a mid-range nation-state.

 

[dilloduck]

So we're going to send our troops to kill every single terrorist in the world so they can't come here ?

You're beginning to get the idea (slowly)

You're insane

Everyone ONE OF THEM ?????

 

[protectionist]

Why? We will just piss them off and create little bitty ISIS's all over the world.

EARTH TO DILLODUCK: Pissing off isn't the issue. There have been jihadists for 1400 years. There likely will be them, for the next 1400 and longer. They don't go away. They're like fleas. You kill them whenever they get close enough to threaten you. When they show up again. You kill them again. It's never going to stop.

 

[dilloduck]

Why? We will just piss them off and create little bitty ISIS's all over the world.

Better, perhaps, than one big ISIS, unchallenged for lack of balls, which grows into something which cannot be stopped.

Hold everything------how big are they? REALLY ??? Even our own intelligence is claiming that the area is a black hole of information.