US More Vulnerable on Afghanistan as it leans harder on NATO Allies for Support..

Discussion in 'Afghanistan' started by AmericasBrave58, Jan 5, 2010.

  1. AmericasBrave58
    Offline

    AmericasBrave58 Retired USN Nurse(Vietnam

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    544
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Seattle,Washington
    Ratings:
    +41
  2. Mr. President
    Offline

    Mr. President BOARD PRESIDENT..carry on

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,423
    Thanks Received:
    272
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +290
    If they sent the appropriate manpower they wouldnt be losing what they are.
     
  3. Colin
    Offline

    Colin Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2009
    Messages:
    6,320
    Thanks Received:
    2,659
    Trophy Points:
    168
    Location:
    England
    Ratings:
    +2,660
    The more troops one sends, the more will be killed or wounded. Why? Because more troops enables areas thus far unsecured to be covered. The combat zone is being increased in size and casualties will increase accordingly.
     
  4. PatekPhilippe
    Offline

    PatekPhilippe Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    8,171
    Thanks Received:
    1,200
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Sasebo Japan
    Ratings:
    +1,200
    Remember Bush tried to get them to participate also. I got to give props to Obama on this. He asked for the French, Germans and Spain to step up and pull their weight...of course they paid lip service to him and then didn't do anything more than what they are doing now...but that's a different thread.

    The only country's actively engaging the enemy to any significant degree are the U.S., our brothers across the pond in the U.K. and our neighbor to the north, Canada. That's good enough for me knowing we 3 share the same goals.
     

Share This Page