There is nothing apparent about it being written in two parts, save for mindless drivel from heretic modernists, apparently like yourself.
At best you refer to the stories of Suzanna and Bel and the Dragon.
The prophecy states that Daniel would stand in his place to the end, and so it shall be.
Looks like you're the odd man out now.
Interesting thread. Daniel is an 'odd man out' book in the OT. I personally don't consider it part of the OT 'canon', since it was apparently written in two parts, and is also the only book in the OT to devote its main part to apocalyptic literature, a very late development in Hebrew scholarship, coinciding with the Pharisees and 'Hellenization' under a foreign ruler, with the later chapters added in the 2nd century B.C., but obviously some of the priests liked it, mostly it seems for political reasons of the times.
Yes, you established yourself as yet another crank quite thoroughly, but thanks for the inane comedy and extra special proof.