Unmasking obama, part II: ECONOMIC FAILURE

[Cuyo]

in his own words. This is a video worth watching
youtube - unmasking obama, part ii: Economic failure

f

 

[bigrebnc1775]

in his own words. This is a video worth watching
youtube - unmasking obama, part ii: Economic failure

f

No Failed as in obama

 

[rightwinger]

If I was you I would not be bragging about that 1.7 percent crap anymore

I notice one thing from the link that right winger and doctor spin keep praising. The 1.7 GDP growth.
Actually that not a good thing becasue the growth should be more than that and from your link

The U.S. economy grew at a 1.7 percent annual rate in the second quarter, marking the start of a slowdown in growth that has concerned the Federal Reserve.

Do you have any concept of what $17.5 trillion in lost wealth under Bush means? Thats more than the entire deficit, more than our annual GDP....vanished under GOP policies

That $17.5 trillion was peoples homes, life savings, retirement that dried up under Bush. Thankfully, under Obama's policies we have regained $9 trillion of that

Do you remember that poat you made bragging about the 1.7 GDP growth under obamas watch?

Positive GROWTH in GDP yes

Considering the massive GDP LOSS we saw under Bush, it is a positive trend. It is the same as showing a profit in your business rather than a loss.

And we LOST $17.5 trillion in our personal wealth under Bush policies

 

[Cuyo]

Well, you might have a hot-linking issue. Because I'm not seeing that chart at all. I'm seeing one that ends in 2002 now. I don't know what's going on.

Ehhrrr...

No he's not having a problem with the dates because the dates shown start in 2006 along the time of the democratic take over.

Nah the chart does seem to change on its own. It just showed it ending in 2004 for me.

Anyways the point is. In Jan 2010 the growth rate was over 5%. The next quarter it was down to 3% and last time it was 1.7% and that is not going in the right direction.

Dude - Look where it was in the months leading up to Obama taking office. How's that for "Not the right direction?"

 

[bigrebnc1775]

no he's not having a problem with the dates because the dates shown start in 2006 along the time of the democratic take over.

nah the chart does seem to change on its own. It just showed it ending in 2004 for me.

Anyways the point is. In jan 2010 the growth rate was over 5%. The next quarter it was down to 3% and last time it was 1.7% and that is not going in the right direction.

dude - look where it was in the months leading up to obama taking office. How's that for "not the right direction?"

dude look at were it's heading in the wrong direction going down is not going up, and coming to a stop is not a good thing

 

[rightwinger]

nah the chart does seem to change on its own. It just showed it ending in 2004 for me.

Anyways the point is. In jan 2010 the growth rate was over 5%. The next quarter it was down to 3% and last time it was 1.7% and that is not going in the right direction.

dude - look where it was in the months leading up to obama taking office. How's that for "not the right direction?"

dude look at were it's heading in the wrong direction going down is not going up, and coming to a stop is not a good thing

Positive GDP growth is not the right direction?

You must be a Republican

 

[bigrebnc1775]

dude - look where it was in the months leading up to obama taking office. How's that for "not the right direction?"

dude look at were it's heading in the wrong direction going down is not going up, and coming to a stop is not a good thing

Positive GDP growth is not the right direction?

You must be a Republican

Did you miss the part where I posted that the feds are concerned with the slow growth? The GDP is not doin g as the government projected.

 

[rightwinger]

dude look at were it's heading in the wrong direction going down is not going up, and coming to a stop is not a good thing

Positive GDP growth is not the right direction?

You must be a Republican

Did you miss the part where I posted that the feds are concerned with the slow growth? The GDP is not doin g as the government projected.

LOL...."Concerned"??

What did you call the economic collapse under Bush?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Positive GDP growth is not the right direction?

You must be a Republican

Did you miss the part where I posted that the feds are concerned with the slow growth? The GDP is not doin g as the government projected.

LOL...."Concerned"??

What did you call the economic collapse under Bush?

Have you ever heard of a double dip? After that comes the obama depression

 

[rightwinger]

Did you miss the part where I posted that the feds are concerned with the slow growth? The GDP is not doin g as the government projected.

LOL...."Concerned"??

What did you call the economic collapse under Bush?

Have you ever heard of a double dip? After that comes the obama depression

Hey Reb..


Don't you have to be in negative territory before you start claiming a dip?

Like your OP propaganda........pure bullshit

 

[bigrebnc1775]

LOL...."Concerned"??

What did you call the economic collapse under Bush?

Have you ever heard of a double dip? After that comes the obama depression

Hey Reb..


Don't you have to be in negative territory before you start claiming a dip?

Like your OP propaganda........pure bullshit

Dude we are in negative territory compared to what we were at in 2006 When the democrats took control. Even though we are in the positive growth slow growth to almost no growth is a recipe for a double dip.

 

[rightwinger]

Have you ever heard of a double dip? After that comes the obama depression

Hey Reb..


Don't you have to be in negative territory before you start claiming a dip?

Like your OP propaganda........pure bullshit

Dude we are in negative territory compared to what we were at in 2006 When the democrats took control. Even though we are in the positive growth slow growth to almost no growth is a recipe for a double dip.

Yes before Bush lost $17.5 Trillion in US Personal wealth

Republican President / Democrat Congress = US lost money

Democrat President/ Democrat Congress= Economy recovered

Just shows we can't have Republicans in control of anything. As soon as we got rid of them...the economy reversed

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Hey Reb..


Don't you have to be in negative territory before you start claiming a dip?

Like your OP propaganda........pure bullshit

Dude we are in negative territory compared to what we were at in 2006 When the democrats took control. Even though we are in the positive growth slow growth to almost no growth is a recipe for a double dip.

Yes before Bush lost $17.5 Trillion in US Personal wealth

Republican President / Democrat Congress = US lost money

Democrat President/ Democrat Congress= Economy recovered

Just shows we can't have Republicans in control of anything. As soon as we got rid of them...the economy reversed

If this is what you call recovered then you are really going to be in for a surprise come Nov. 2, 2010. Less then 30 days away.

 

[Cuyo]

Dude we are in negative territory compared to what we were at in 2006 When the democrats took control. Even though we are in the positive growth slow growth to almost no growth is a recipe for a double dip.

Yes before Bush lost $17.5 Trillion in US Personal wealth

Republican President / Democrat Congress = US lost money

Democrat President/ Democrat Congress= Economy recovered

Just shows we can't have Republicans in control of anything. As soon as we got rid of them...the economy reversed

If this is what you call recovered then you are really going to be in for a surprise come Nov. 2, 2010. Less then 30 days away.

Even if it's a huge landslide victory for Republicans like you're hoping, it still won't change the fact that you're a god damned moron.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes before Bush lost $17.5 Trillion in US Personal wealth

Republican President / Democrat Congress = US lost money

Democrat President/ Democrat Congress= Economy recovered

Just shows we can't have Republicans in control of anything. As soon as we got rid of them...the economy reversed

If this is what you call recovered then you are really going to be in for a surprise come Nov. 2, 2010. Less then 30 days away.

Even if it's a huge landslide victory for Republicans like you're hoping, it still won't change the fact that you're a god damned moron.

I could care less if it's a republiocan who wins just as long as the liberals are kick the fuck out of my payroll.

You may think I am a moron thats your opinion but you have yet to show proof that I am one. Saying I am doesn't mean a damn thing bitch it's up to you to prove it son of a bitch

 

[Cuyo]

If this is what you call recovered then you are really going to be in for a surprise come Nov. 2, 2010. Less then 30 days away.

Even if it's a huge landslide victory for Republicans like you're hoping, it still won't change the fact that you're a god damned moron.

I could care less if it's a republiocan who wins just as long as the liberals are kick the fuck out of my payroll.

Yes, and you feel that way because you're a god damned moron.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Even if it's a huge landslide victory for Republicans like you're hoping, it still won't change the fact that you're a god damned moron.

I could care less if it's a republiocan who wins just as long as the liberals are kick the fuck out of my payroll.

Yes, and you feel that way because you're a god damned moron.

As I said
You may think I am a moron that’s your opinion but you have yet to show proof that I am one. Saying I am doesn't mean a damn thing bitch it's up to you to prove it son of a bitch

Unlike you I am not a partisan political hack. I just hate liberals and progressives communist socialist

 

[Cuyo]

I could care less if it's a republiocan who wins just as long as the liberals are kick the fuck out of my payroll.

Yes, and you feel that way because you're a god damned moron.

As I said
You may think I am a moron that’s your opinion but you have yet to show proof that I am one. Saying I am doesn't mean a damn thing bitch it's up to you to prove it son of a bitch

Unlike you I am not a partisan political hack. I just hate liberals and progressives communist socialist

Does anyone think Big Red is not a god damn moron? Anyone?

[cricket, cricket]

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes, and you feel that way because you're a god damned moron.

As I said
You may think I am a moron that’s your opinion but you have yet to show proof that I am one. Saying I am doesn't mean a damn thing bitch it's up to you to prove it son of a bitch

Unlike you I am not a partisan political hack. I just hate liberals and progressives communist socialist

Does anyone think Big Red is not a god damn moron? Anyone?

[cricket, cricket]

So it's opinions. You would think someone as smart as you think you are would realize that opinions do not make an argument.

 

[ConHog]

I could care less if it's a republiocan who wins just as long as the liberals are kick the fuck out of my payroll.

Yes, and you feel that way because you're a god damned moron.

As I said
You may think I am a moron that’s your opinion but you have yet to show proof that I am one. Saying I am doesn't mean a damn thing bitch it's up to you to prove it son of a bitch

Unlike you I am not a partisan political hack. I just hate liberals and progressives communist socialist

Dude, you prove you're a moron every time you post.