Christ_on_a_croissant
Platinum Member
- Apr 3, 2020
- 1,440
- 944
- 918
Did she lie to the FBI?By contrast, is it not then fair to ask, "Y'all got all worked up about Flynn getting an answer wrong, but seemingly have no problem with this?"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did she lie to the FBI?By contrast, is it not then fair to ask, "Y'all got all worked up about Flynn getting an answer wrong, but seemingly have no problem with this?"
7 times in 2 months. No, it doesn’t make a difference, unless she was daily unmasking multiple people, which would then raise other red flags.By contrast, is it not then fair to ask, "Y'all got all worked up about Flynn getting an answer wrong, but seemingly have no problem with this?"Y’all seemingly had no problem with Flynn “forgetting” about his conversation with Kislyak three weeks after it happened but get all worked up about this?
Hypocrites.
Flynn was questioned 4 weeks after his phone call. Power was what, a year?
Makes a difference if you ask me.
People are unmasked hundreds of times a year. The unmasking request goes through an approval process set up to determine if it's necessary or not.7 times in 2 months. No, it doesn’t make a difference, unless she was daily unmasking multiple people, which would then raise other red flags.By contrast, is it not then fair to ask, "Y'all got all worked up about Flynn getting an answer wrong, but seemingly have no problem with this?"Y’all seemingly had no problem with Flynn “forgetting” about his conversation with Kislyak three weeks after it happened but get all worked up about this?
Hypocrites.
Flynn was questioned 4 weeks after his phone call. Power was what, a year?
Makes a difference if you ask me.
Married to Commie Cass Sunstien?The unmasking list released by Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell on Wednesday shows that Obama-era U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power issued seven separate unmasking requests from Nov. 30, 2016, to Jan. 11, 2017, pertaining to an individual cited in a National Security Agency intelligence report.
That individual is now known to have been then-incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.
The list, seen below, further proves that Power then lied to Congress on Oct. 13, 2017, by telling the House Intelligence Committee she had “no recollection” of ever issuing any unmasking requests pertaining to Flynn.
Samantha Power told Congress under oath ‘no recollection’ of Flynn unmasking, records show otherwise
Samantha Power made seven unmasking requests related to Michael Flynn but then turned around and lied about these requests to Congress.www.bizpacreview.com
BJ-
I'm sure that it is just a coincidence that her husband is that little bastard Cass Sunstein.
I ask Again. What was Flynn’s specific lie(s)People are unmasked hundreds of times a year. The unmasking request goes through an approval process set up to determine if it's necessary or not.7 times in 2 months. No, it doesn’t make a difference, unless she was daily unmasking multiple people, which would then raise other red flags.By contrast, is it not then fair to ask, "Y'all got all worked up about Flynn getting an answer wrong, but seemingly have no problem with this?"Y’all seemingly had no problem with Flynn “forgetting” about his conversation with Kislyak three weeks after it happened but get all worked up about this?
Hypocrites.
Flynn was questioned 4 weeks after his phone call. Power was what, a year?
Makes a difference if you ask me.
I ask Again. What was Flynn’s specific lie(s)People are unmasked hundreds of times a year. The unmasking request goes through an approval process set up to determine if it's necessary or not.7 times in 2 months. No, it doesn’t make a difference, unless she was daily unmasking multiple people, which would then raise other red flags.By contrast, is it not then fair to ask, "Y'all got all worked up about Flynn getting an answer wrong, but seemingly have no problem with this?"Y’all seemingly had no problem with Flynn “forgetting” about his conversation with Kislyak three weeks after it happened but get all worked up about this?
Hypocrites.
Flynn was questioned 4 weeks after his phone call. Power was what, a year?
Makes a difference if you ask me.
Cass Sunstein in February:The unmasking list released by Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell on Wednesday shows that Obama-era U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power issued seven separate unmasking requests from Nov. 30, 2016, to Jan. 11, 2017, pertaining to an individual cited in a National Security Agency intelligence report.
That individual is now known to have been then-incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.
The list, seen below, further proves that Power then lied to Congress on Oct. 13, 2017, by telling the House Intelligence Committee she had “no recollection” of ever issuing any unmasking requests pertaining to Flynn.
Samantha Power told Congress under oath ‘no recollection’ of Flynn unmasking, records show otherwise
Samantha Power made seven unmasking requests related to Michael Flynn but then turned around and lied about these requests to Congress.www.bizpacreview.com
BJ-
I'm sure that it is just a coincidence that her husband is that little bastard Cass Sunstein.
So circumstances dictate when a lie under oath is acceptable? I don't think you would grant say, Trump, that kind of leeway if he was questioned under oath and got some details wrong about something that might have happened 30 years ago.By contrast, is it not then fair to ask, "Y'all got all worked up about Flynn getting an answer wrong, but seemingly have no problem with this?"Y’all seemingly had no problem with Flynn “forgetting” about his conversation with Kislyak three weeks after it happened but get all worked up about this?
Hypocrites.
Flynn was questioned 4 weeks after his phone call. Power was what, a year?
Makes a difference if you ask me.
Does it matter who you're lying to if you are under oath?Did she lie to the FBI?By contrast, is it not then fair to ask, "Y'all got all worked up about Flynn getting an answer wrong, but seemingly have no problem with this?"
Finally!!! Thank you. Still somewhat vague but now I have a much better understanding of it.I ask Again. What was Flynn’s specific lie(s)People are unmasked hundreds of times a year. The unmasking request goes through an approval process set up to determine if it's necessary or not.7 times in 2 months. No, it doesn’t make a difference, unless she was daily unmasking multiple people, which would then raise other red flags.By contrast, is it not then fair to ask, "Y'all got all worked up about Flynn getting an answer wrong, but seemingly have no problem with this?"Y’all seemingly had no problem with Flynn “forgetting” about his conversation with Kislyak three weeks after it happened but get all worked up about this?
Hypocrites.
Flynn was questioned 4 weeks after his phone call. Power was what, a year?
Makes a difference if you ask me.
Flynn swore before the court that this occurred.
You are thinking of Hillary..........."I don't recall".
Isn't that the exact verbiage Trump used in his written replies to the Mueller questions?
Approval process ?People are unmasked hundreds of times a year. The unmasking request goes through an approval process set up to determine if it's necessary or not.
The approval process goes through offices at the NSA, not sure about all the details. Flynn was not deprived of due process.Approval process ?People are unmasked hundreds of times a year. The unmasking request goes through an approval process set up to determine if it's necessary or not.
Obama, Biden, Brennan, Comey, Clapper and Rice were in the Oval office at the time.
What they forgot was to approve General Flynn and the others' due process.
Trump admin official Richard Grenell was the one who leaked the document, originally to Republican senators.
As usual, it was Republicans doing the leaking. After all, it's always Republicans doing the leaking. As the OP points out, the Republicans were engaging in espionage against the USA. Again.
Really ?The approval process goes through offices at the NSA, not sure about all the details. Flynn was not deprived of due process.
Really ?The approval process goes through offices at the NSA, not sure about all the details. Flynn was not deprived of due process.
The NSA director saying take the kill shot
- that part of what you call "due process" - leaking classified information to the press to hurt a political opponent ?
It wasn't for national security. It was a political hit job.According to Sydney Powell? Sure buddy. Whatever you say.