United Nations considers trying to OUTLAW all fossil fuels on the planet, which would lead to the starvation and death of billions of people

[bripat9643]

Sri Lanka already tried this. The result was mass starvation.

United Nations considers trying to OUTLAW all fossil fuels on the planet, which would lead to the starvation and death of billions of people​

The COP27 globalist gathering that recently took place in Egypt came with open calls for a global phase-out of, and eventual ban on, all fossil fuels. Were this to actually happen, billions of people would die.​

​

A tiny, failing island in the South Pacific called Tuvalu (ever heard of it?) made the proposition using the following quoted statement:​

​

“We, therefore, unite with 100 Nobel Peace Prize laureates and 1000s of scientists worldwide to urge world leaders to join the fossil fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, to manage a just transition away from fossil fuels.”​

​

One wonders: what does Tuvalu mean by the term “just transition?” Is ending most human life on earth considered by the globalists to be the “just” thing to do? Because that it what eliminating all fossil fuel usage would do​

 

[Vastator]

I don't take any of this shit seriously...

 

[White 6]

Sri Lanka already tried this. The result was mass starvation.

United Nations considers trying to OUTLAW all fossil fuels on the planet, which would lead to the starvation and death of billions of people​

The COP27 globalist gathering that recently took place in Egypt came with open calls for a global phase-out of, and eventual ban on, all fossil fuels. Were this to actually happen, billions of people would die.​

​

A tiny, failing island in the South Pacific called Tuvalu (ever heard of it?) made the proposition using the following quoted statement:​

​

“We, therefore, unite with 100 Nobel Peace Prize laureates and 1000s of scientists worldwide to urge world leaders to join the fossil fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, to manage a just transition away from fossil fuels.”​

​

One wonders: what does Tuvalu mean by the term “just transition?” Is ending most human life on earth considered by the globalists to be the “just” thing to do? Because that it what eliminating all fossil fuel usage would do​

The UN has been corrupted and mostly useless for years by it's own agree rules, practices and influences. I could be wrong, but I think we pick up most of the tab. We should offshore it, to someplace like Haiti, where it would improve real estate value, but be less swanky digs than New York. Then sell the attractive Manhattan property for development or parking lot space. We would have less riffraff (supposed) diplomatic staff, in and out of the country, giving cover to international influence peddler, criminals and foreign government espionage, etc. I am just not a fan of the United Nations, but maybe many of you are. If we did offshore it, how many of you think we would actually miss it, taking up space in New York? Just sayin....

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The UN Building could make a dandy homeless shelter. It needs to be dismantled.

 

[The Original Tree]

Sri Lanka already tried this. The result was mass starvation.

United Nations considers trying to OUTLAW all fossil fuels on the planet, which would lead to the starvation and death of billions of people​

The COP27 globalist gathering that recently took place in Egypt came with open calls for a global phase-out of, and eventual ban on, all fossil fuels. Were this to actually happen, billions of people would die.​

​

A tiny, failing island in the South Pacific called Tuvalu (ever heard of it?) made the proposition using the following quoted statement:​

​

“We, therefore, unite with 100 Nobel Peace Prize laureates and 1000s of scientists worldwide to urge world leaders to join the fossil fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, to manage a just transition away from fossil fuels.”​

​

One wonders: what does Tuvalu mean by the term “just transition?” Is ending most human life on earth considered by the globalists to be the “just” thing to do? Because that it what eliminating all fossil fuel usage would do​

If you haven't been paying attention Biden nor The UN has the Legal Right to tell us he will outlaw gasoline engine production by 2035.
Biden does not have the authority to Unilaterally Nationalize our Automobile Manufacturing and then begin to dictate what products they manufacture forcing them to convert their entire infrastructure to manufacture EVs by 2035 and abandon the product they have developed and manufactures for 100 plus years.

Also, anyone reading this, do not buy an EV. Total Cost of ownership of an EV is near 100,000 over the life of the vehicle when you factor in battery replacement vs. Hybrid or gasoline about about $45,00 t0 $50,000 for the average vehicle.

 

[OldFlame]

The UN has been corrupted and mostly useless for years by it's own agree rules, practices and influences. I could be wrong, but I think we pick up most of the tab. We should offshore it, to someplace like Haiti, where it would improve real estate value, but be less swanky digs than New York. Then sell the attractive Manhattan property for development or parking lot space. We would have less riffraff (supposed) diplomatic staff, in and out of the country, giving cover to international influence peddler, criminals and foreign government espionage, etc. I am just not a fan of the United Nations, but maybe many of you are. If we did offshore it, how many of you think we would actually miss it, taking up space in New York? Just sayin....

That's what Trump wanted to do.

 

[White 6]

That's what Trump wanted to do.

Even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Sri Lanka already tried this. The result was mass starvation.

United Nations considers trying to OUTLAW all fossil fuels on the planet, which would lead to the starvation and death of billions of people​

The COP27 globalist gathering that recently took place in Egypt came with open calls for a global phase-out of, and eventual ban on, all fossil fuels. Were this to actually happen, billions of people would die.​

​

A tiny, failing island in the South Pacific called Tuvalu (ever heard of it?) made the proposition using the following quoted statement:​

​

“We, therefore, unite with 100 Nobel Peace Prize laureates and 1000s of scientists worldwide to urge world leaders to join the fossil fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, to manage a just transition away from fossil fuels.”​

​

One wonders: what does Tuvalu mean by the term “just transition?” Is ending most human life on earth considered by the globalists to be the “just” thing to do? Because that it what eliminating all fossil fuel usage would do​

Unelected bureaucrats from foreign nations making policy decisions for the world. Are they going to send in the blue helmets to enforce these bans ? The UN is a worthless organization that wouldn't survive without Uncle Sugar and the US tax payer.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Sri Lanka already tried this. The result was mass starvation.

United Nations considers trying to OUTLAW all fossil fuels on the planet, which would lead to the starvation and death of billions of people​

The COP27 globalist gathering that recently took place in Egypt came with open calls for a global phase-out of, and eventual ban on, all fossil fuels. Were this to actually happen, billions of people would die.​

​

A tiny, failing island in the South Pacific called Tuvalu (ever heard of it?) made the proposition using the following quoted statement:​

​

“We, therefore, unite with 100 Nobel Peace Prize laureates and 1000s of scientists worldwide to urge world leaders to join the fossil fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, to manage a just transition away from fossil fuels.”​

​

One wonders: what does Tuvalu mean by the term “just transition?” Is ending most human life on earth considered by the globalists to be the “just” thing to do? Because that it what eliminating all fossil fuel usage would do​

Depopulation has always been the goal of the UN... to them this is a wanted outcome and to be applauded. Never mind that it is you they want to die...

 

[OldFlame]

Even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while.

Pathetic, you're a fool that cuts his own nose off to spite his face.

 

[The Original Tree]

American EV Carmakers Are Still Losing Billions Of Dollars Every Quarter

American EV Carmakers Are Still Losing Billions Of Dollars Every Quarter ... goal for 2022 was 20,000 vehicles,” writes the news site.

www.theautopian.com

Lucid is losing money, Rivian is losing money, Tesla is treading water in China, but at least the Italians are trying to make an EV.

Welcome to The Morning Dump, bite-sized stories corralled into a single article for your morning perusal. If your morning coffee’s working a little too well, pull up a throne and have a gander at the best of the rest of yesterday.

Lucid Lost $670 Million Last Quarter​

Lucid Group, maker of the slippery Lucid Air electric sedan, posted up some big numbers this quarter. On the revenue front, it pulled in $196 million, which trounces the $232,000 it made in the same quarter in 2021. The other big number? A net loss of $670 million, per Automotive News. Making cars is hard.

The numbers are extra bleak because, as Automotive News notes, Lucid now says it’ll meet its production goals despite supply chain issues. That’s a good thing, right? Well, not when the big goal is to produce 6,000 to 7,000 cars. “The automaker’s original production goal for 2022 was 20,000 vehicles,” writes the news site.

The same Automotive News piece has a quote from the company’s CEO sort of explaining what’s going on:

Lucid CEO Peter Rawlinson said on Tuesday’s earnings call that the automaker continues to struggle with supply-chain issues but expects to meet its 2022 production guidance despite the challenges.
“In fact,” Rawlinson said, “even now we are experiencing a challenge with one particular item that will lead to a very temporary timeout for the [production] line.” Rawlinson did not name the item in short supply but said the downtime would be used to implement changes that would ultimately increase production.

That isn’t at all crpytic.

At the moment Lucid only has the one car and, according to the company, about 34,000 total reservations. An upcoming SUV, the Gravity, is going to debut next week before the LA Auto Show.

Rivian Expected To Lose About $1.7 Billion, With A ‘B’​

Electric truckmaker Rivian is poised to announce big numbers today as well, but those big numbers will be of the negative variety. In Q2 of this year the company posted a loss of $1.7 billion. What’s the guess for this quarter? According to analysts it’s about $1.7 billion. From Automotive News:

When the automaker reports third-quarter earnings on Wednesday after the market close, financial analysts are expecting revenue of about $552 million on improving deliveries of its adventure vehicles, but also another net loss similar to Rivian’s $1.7 billion loss in the second quarter.

This doesn’t mean the trucks aren’t good. By most accounts, the trucks are very good. The engineering that goes into them is also impressive. [Editor’s Note: If you want to read the most detailed, tech-heavy review of the R1T, check mine out. It’s a great truck. -DT]. It’s extremely tough out there for established OEMs with longstanding supply chains and Rivian is ramping up a new car and a new brand out of thin air. Making cars is hard.

If there’s good news for Rivian it’s that the company’s Electric delivery vans are being delivered to Amazon as expected. As Electrek reports:

According to Amazon’s latest update, the Rivian EDV rollout is progressing as planned, with over 1,000 fully electric delivery vans debuting in more than 100 US cities this holiday season. A few of the newest cities you may be able to spot one of these EDVs in are Boston, New York, Las Vegas, and Pittsburgh.

Has anyone seen one on their neighborhood?

Tesla Trying To Woo Chinese Buyers As Musk Sells Stock​

Tesla is the most established of all electric automaker startups [Editor’s Note: I think we ca stop calling it that now. -DT] and even it’s having some issues, particularly in China where deliveries have been on a roller coaster ride and competition has gotten stiffer.

To try to compete in China it looks like Tesla aims to give people a break on their insurance. I’ll let Reuters explain how this works:

The U.S. automaker previously offered an insurance incentive of 7,000 yuan ($970) for orders between Oct. 1 and Dec. 30. But on Tuesday Tesla said the incentive for November was raised to 8,000 yuan and reduced for December orders to 4,000 yuan.

“As long as you like it enough, pick up Tesla immediately!” Tesla said in its official Weibo account when announcing the policy change.

The insurance incentive is a cash rebate offered to buyers to buy insurance from Tesla’s partner insurers.

Tesla having more competition is clearly good for buyers, though a little challenging for Elon Musk. The CEO of Tesla and now Twitter appears to have told people in August that he was done selling shares; now it’s November and, per CNBC, he just sold $3.95 billion worth of shares. I hope he got an insurance discount.

​

 

[White 6]

Pathetic, you're a fool that cuts his own nose off to spite his face.

Not me. I take care of myself quite well on my own, thank you. Trump's got nothing I need (never has had) and brings things to the table I don't approve of or want. He did nothing but stir up conflict, and bad management. I can easily do without him and look forward to him not being a public figure, but going back to being a private figure.

 

[BlindBoo]

I love the gloom and doom UN threads.

How does the UN propose to implement this directive. It must rely on member states and their Armed forces to implement any directive. All the Armies run on fossil fuels..........

 

[BackAgain]

Population control, UN style.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The COP27 globalist gathering that recently took place in Egypt came with open calls for a global phase-out of, and eventual ban on, all fossil fuels. Were this to actually happen, billions of people would die.​

Liberals hate cheap energy so much, they're willing to kill billions of people to get rid of it.

 

[The Original Tree]

Sri Lanka already tried this. The result was mass starvation.

United Nations considers trying to OUTLAW all fossil fuels on the planet, which would lead to the starvation and death of billions of people​

The COP27 globalist gathering that recently took place in Egypt came with open calls for a global phase-out of, and eventual ban on, all fossil fuels. Were this to actually happen, billions of people would die.​

​

A tiny, failing island in the South Pacific called Tuvalu (ever heard of it?) made the proposition using the following quoted statement:​

​

“We, therefore, unite with 100 Nobel Peace Prize laureates and 1000s of scientists worldwide to urge world leaders to join the fossil fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, to manage a just transition away from fossil fuels.”​

​

One wonders: what does Tuvalu mean by the term “just transition?” Is ending most human life on earth considered by the globalists to be the “just” thing to do? Because that it what eliminating all fossil fuel usage would do​

This is The Outcome they are Trying to achieve.

And before some asshole says, "Do you really think they are going to try to do this?"

Yes, they are, because they said they are. Biden belongs in a mental hospital for going along with this.
He wants the military to be battery operated by 2050, and reduce emissions by 50% by 2030.
Absolutely dangerous and unachievable if you are going to have a military at all.

Then when you add this to the fact he wants a total ban on Hydrocarbon Fuels and wants to completely ban the manufacture of gasoline engines by 2035, the man should be article 25'd!

When these Satanic Earth Worshipping Assholes tell you that they want to depopulate the planet by 5 Billion People, believe the assholes.

The Planet has a Fever and People are The Virus.
Al Gore

 

[The Original Tree]

Liberals hate cheap energy so much, they're willing to kill billions of people to get rid of it.

No willing. They are SALIVATING OVER THE CHANCE. The lust for blood and death.

 

[The Original Tree]

I love the gloom and doom UN threads.

How does the UN propose to implement this directive. It must rely on member states and their Armed forces to implement any directive. All the Armies run on fossil fuels..........

F The UN with a Cactus in The Ass and anyone that supports them.
They do not rule The UNITED STATES.
F Them, and F The Paris Accords.
But most importantly F Joe Biden and F all Global Warming Cultists!

Joe Biden needs removed from office on an Article 25 yesterday!

 

[g5000]

Sri Lanka already tried this. The result was mass starvation.

Sri Lanka did not attempt to ban fossil fuels, idiot.

Stop talking out of your ass.

They ran out of money to import fossil fuels. They didn't ban it.

 

[bripat9643]

Sri Lanka did not attempt to ban fossil fuels, idiot.

Stop talking out of your ass.

They ran out of money to import fossil fuels. They didn't ban it.

They banned fertilizer, moron. Their food production went down by 60% as a result. They ran out of money because some eco warrior lunatic socialist mismanaged the economy.