Unequal distribution of wealth

Whatever happened to good, strong work ethic? We owe it to ourselves to improve our own self esteem, to reach higher goals. We owe it to ourselves to improve our own life. To envy and want someone else's wealth to make us happy or equalize our standing is folly - it's not going to do a damn thing because the "wanting" never quit wanting.

America, overall, has been the most generous nation on earth - Americans stand up and give to the best of our ability to help those in need. I can't afford to give large sums to various causes or charities - but $1 for a pink Susan Komen grocery bag, $1 at the grocery checkout line for something for the troops, $1 at Arby's for Alzheimer's for a coupon book that I will likely never use, donating some nonperishable food to food drives - it all adds up.

Save all the change in your pockets at the end of the day and plop it in a jar. I have a bad habit of dumping change in the bottom of my purse - one time my purse got so heavy I just dumped the whole thing and came up with about $17 in change. It all adds up.

Envy and sloth are two of the seven deadly sins.
 
I'd like to know why the unequal distribution of wealth is a bad thing. This seems to be a major premise from those on the left, but it's like you just assume it's a bad thing without every really providing evidence or justifying the premise.


Forcing me to work for somebody else is what the distribution of wealth is.

Distribution of wealth is Marxism.

Wealth is nothing more than ones labor, wealth is my labor in a tangible form I can trade for another person's labor.

That is why its bad, distribution of wealth is stealing, forced slavery, servitude, socialist/marxism.

Wealth is the physical representation of my labor, my work, my success, or my dumb luck.

Again, its the unequal distribution of intelligence that is the problem.
 
I'd like to know why the unequal distribution of wealth is a bad thing. This seems to be a major premise from those on the left, but it's like you just assume it's a bad thing without every really providing evidence or justifying the premise.


Forcing me to work for somebody else is what the distribution of wealth is.

Distribution of wealth is Marxism.

Wealth is nothing more than ones labor, wealth is my labor in a tangible form I can trade for another person's labor.

That is why its bad, distribution of wealth is stealing, forced slavery, servitude, socialist/marxism.

Wealth is the physical representation of my labor, my work, my success, or my dumb luck.

Again, its the unequal distribution of intelligence that is the problem.

Wealth is much more than ones labor.


The 1% did not do the labor that created their wealth.

Most of them inherited it.
 
I'd like to know why the unequal distribution of wealth is a bad thing. This seems to be a major premise from those on the left, but it's like you just assume it's a bad thing without every really providing evidence or justifying the premise.


Forcing me to work for somebody else is what the distribution of wealth is.

Distribution of wealth is Marxism.

Wealth is nothing more than ones labor, wealth is my labor in a tangible form I can trade for another person's labor.

That is why its bad, distribution of wealth is stealing, forced slavery, servitude, socialist/marxism.

Wealth is the physical representation of my labor, my work, my success, or my dumb luck.

Again, its the unequal distribution of intelligence that is the problem.

Wealth is much more than ones labor.


The 1% did not do the labor that created their wealth.

Most of them inherited it.

Which, even if true, makes it your business how?? Makes it that you are entitled to their possessions or wealth how?
 
I'd like to know why the unequal distribution of wealth is a bad thing. This seems to be a major premise from those on the left, but it's like you just assume it's a bad thing without every really providing evidence or justifying the premise.


Forcing me to work for somebody else is what the distribution of wealth is.

Distribution of wealth is Marxism.

Wealth is nothing more than ones labor, wealth is my labor in a tangible form I can trade for another person's labor.

That is why its bad, distribution of wealth is stealing, forced slavery, servitude, socialist/marxism.

Wealth is the physical representation of my labor, my work, my success, or my dumb luck.

Again, its the unequal distribution of intelligence that is the problem.

Wealth is much more than ones labor.


The 1% did not do the labor that created their wealth.

Most of them inherited it.

Like Gore?
 
I'd like to know why the unequal distribution of wealth is a bad thing. This seems to be a major premise from those on the left, but it's like you just assume it's a bad thing without every really providing evidence or justifying the premise.


Forcing me to work for somebody else is what the distribution of wealth is.

Distribution of wealth is Marxism.

Wealth is nothing more than ones labor, wealth is my labor in a tangible form I can trade for another person's labor.

That is why its bad, distribution of wealth is stealing, forced slavery, servitude, socialist/marxism.

Wealth is the physical representation of my labor, my work, my success, or my dumb luck.

Again, its the unequal distribution of intelligence that is the problem.

Wealth is much more than ones labor.


The 1% did not do the labor that created their wealth.

Most of them inherited it.

So what, what makes that your business. The government has no right to know where anyone gets their money or how much they have.

That is why I state one tax, when you spend a buck you are taxed on a buck, 10% never more, never less.

The 1% you speak of inherited the labor of their fathers. Its not your business or the governments.

you are beyond sour grapes.
 
Last edited:
Who Rules America: Wealth, Income, and Power



"The government has no right to know where anyone gets their money or how much they have"


that is a recipie for crime you complete IDIOT.

Listen you snot nosed wimp, you cant even comment on your link or take the time to cut and paste a line or two.

I think its time for those who constantly link to quit being lazy and stupid, lazy is not quoting a line or two, stupid is not commenting on your link.

Not much of a post piss-ant.
 
Last edited:
I think that those who preach this philosophy should begin with spreading their own wealth out to the masses first. Live the way they do. That's why Obama is full of shit. He's living fat and carefree and he wants us to suffer equally.
 
I'd like to know why the unequal distribution of wealth is a bad thing. This seems to be a major premise from those on the left, but it's like you just assume it's a bad thing without every really providing evidence or justifying the premise.

That's what every king, ruler and robber baron always said.
 
Wealth is much more than ones labor.


The 1% did not do the labor that created their wealth.

Most of them inherited it.

Of the 25 richest people of the world, how many of them inherited it?

That's right. False stereotypes are not gonna fly forever.

The reason Obama is failing miserably at the G20 is because other countries aren't buying his bullshit. They can see right through him. They aren't subject to the same media we are. They might even have a few more people willing to use a more common-sense approach rather then falling for this Global Warming crap that is proving to be a disaster for any economy. German Anger At US Economic Policy

Obama has turned our government on it's head. He has little legitimacy left. The only kind of governments that will deal with an illegitimate and dishonest government are despots and terrorists regimes.
 
Last edited:
I'd like to know why the unequal distribution of wealth is a bad thing. This seems to be a major premise from those on the left, but it's like you just assume it's a bad thing without every really providing evidence or justifying the premise.

That's what every king, ruler and robber baron always said.

Any proof for that statement?

Are you for real rabies? Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee're off to see the wizard...

450px-Emerald.JPG
 
I'd like to know why the unequal distribution of wealth is a bad thing. This seems to be a major premise from those on the left, but it's like you just assume it's a bad thing without every really providing evidence or justifying the premise.


Forcing me to work for somebody else is what the distribution of wealth is.

Distribution of wealth is Marxism.

Wealth is nothing more than ones labor, wealth is my labor in a tangible form I can trade for another person's labor.

That is why its bad, distribution of wealth is stealing, forced slavery, servitude, socialist/marxism.

Wealth is the physical representation of my labor, my work, my success, or my dumb luck.

Again, its the unequal distribution of intelligence that is the problem.

Wealth is much more than ones labor.


The 1% did not do the labor that created their wealth.

Most of them inherited it.

Jealousy is never a good thing. It is still about others wanting what someone else has. My guess you would be feeling to badly if someone left you a chunk of money.
 
From an E-Mail verified by Snopes. snopes.com: Arab States Vote Against U.S. in U.N.

How they vote in the United Nations:

Below are the actual voting records of various Arabic/Islamic States which are recorded in both the US State Department and United Nations records:

Kuwaitvotes againstthe United States 67% of the time

Qatar votesagainstthe United States 67% of the time

Morocco votesagainstthe United States 70% of the time

United Arab Emirates votesagainstthe U. S. 70% of the time.

Jordan votesagainstthe United States 71% of the time.

Tunisia votesagainstthe United States 71% of the time.

Saudi Arabia votesagainstthe United States 73% of the time.

Yemen votesagainstthe United States 74% of the time.

Algeria votesagainstthe United States 74% of the time.

Oman votesagainstthe United States 74% of the time.

Sudan votesagainstthe United States 75% of the time.

Pakistan votesagainstthe United States 75% of the time.

Libya votesagainstthe United States 76% of the time.

Egypt votesagainstthe United States 79% of the time.

Lebanon votesagainstthe United States 80% of the time.

India votes againstthe United States 81% of the time.

Syria votesagainstthe United States 84% of the time.

Mauritania votesagainstthe United States 87% of the time.

U S Foreign Aid to those that hate us:

Egypt,for example, after voting 79% of the time against the United States , still receives$2 billion annuallyin US Foreign Aid.

Jordanvotes 71% against the United States

And receives$192,814,000 annuallyin US Foreign Aid.

Pakistanvotes 75% against the United States

Receives$6,721,000annually in US Foreign Aid.

Indiavotes 81% against the United States

Receives$143,699,000annually.
I'm all for cutting off their aid. Ingrates don't deserve it.

Just like spoiled children. I'm also for shutting down at LEAST half our military bases (around 350 closed) around the world, and letting those nations defend themselves.

I'm sure the local economies won't suffer at all either. We need to quit enabling.
 

Forum List

Back
Top