- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,398
- 142,631
- 2,615
- Thread starter
- #41
Gallup?
The ones that had Romney winning the election?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I love it! 146K is solid growth! First right from your own propaganda piece, 150K is need for minimum stability in the job market. 200K is solid growth son.Merry Christmas from the Obama's.
US economy adds 146K jobs, rate falls to 7.7 pct. - Yahoo! Finance
US economy adds 146K jobs; jobless rate falls to 4-year low of 7.7 percent; Sandy minor factor
Right from your article. The unemployment rate didn't go down because of the low hiring rate; it went down because the labor department systematically removed 350K people from the labor force!
As the economy improves... you, will only become more negative. Gloom and doom much?
Way to lower the bar.. we're now celebrating 7.7% unemployment? We spent $1,000,000,000,000 to settle on 7.7% unemployment.
Fucking hilarious.
Way to lower the bar.. we're now celebrating 7.7% unemployment? We spent $1,000,000,000,000 to settle on 7.7% unemployment.
Fucking hilarious.
This is just another hack troll thread.
LOL
Bragging about 7.7% unemployment 4 years into Obamanomics
LOL
KoolAid snorters
That's not all you did, hack troll.Way to lower the bar.. we're now celebrating 7.7% unemployment? We spent $1,000,000,000,000 to settle on 7.7% unemployment.
Fucking hilarious.
This is just another hack troll thread.
Ummmmm
How is posting the recently released unemployment numbers a "hack troll thread"??
LOL
Bragging about 7.7% unemployment 4 years into Obamanomics
LOL
KoolAid snorters
SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers
Eight Years After Passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Key Provisions Will Now Be Implemented
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2007-190
Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2007 - Ending eight years of stalled negotiations and impasse, the Commission today voted to adopt, jointly with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), new rules that will finally implement the bank broker provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. The Board will consider these final rules at its Sept. 24, 2007 meeting. The Commission and the Board consulted with and sought the concurrence of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of Thrift Supervision.
please explain what the impact of this refusal to fully impliment the protections written into the GLBact produced
That's not all you did, hack troll.This is just another hack troll thread.
Ummmmm
How is posting the recently released unemployment numbers a "hack troll thread"??
LOL
Bragging about 7.7% unemployment 4 years into Obamanomics
LOL
KoolAid snorters
(CNSNews.com) - Seventy-three percent of the new civilian jobs created in the United States over the last five months are in government, according to official data published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
In June, a total of 142,415,000 people were employed in the U.S, according to the BLS, including 19,938,000 who were employed by federal, state and local governments.
By November, according to data BLS released today, the total number of people employed had climbed to 143,262,000, an overall increase of 847,000 in the six months since June.
In the same five-month period since June, the number of people employed by government increased by 621,000 to 20,559,000. These 621,000 new government jobs created in the last five months equal 73.3 percent of the 847,000 new jobs created overall.
73% of New Jobs Created in Last 5 Months Are in Government | CNS News
That's not all you did, hack troll.Ummmmm
How is posting the recently released unemployment numbers a "hack troll thread"??
You are correct....I included the words "Good news"
I forgot you are one of those right wing America hating hacks who are rooting for the economy to fail
Pretending that the Republicans nearly destroyed the economy doesn't make it so. Neither the Republicans NOR the Democrats destroyed the Economy, the Banksters did.pretending your party did not nearly distroy the entire world economy with their hisorically failed ideas doesnt make it unfact
pretending your party did not nearly distroy the entire world economy with their hisorically failed ideas doesnt make it unfact
Prove the repubs did it on there own
Pretending that the Republicans nearly destroyed the economy doesn't make it so. Neither the Republicans NOR the Democrats destroyed the Economy, the Banksters did.pretending your party did not nearly distroy the entire world economy with their hisorically failed ideas doesnt make it unfact
Hank Paulson held a gun to Congress' head in 2008: "There will be Martial Law if we dont get the Banker Bailouts". Bankers OWN and RUN the United States.
Pretending they don't doesn't make it so.
pretending your party did not nearly distroy the entire world economy with their hisorically failed ideas doesnt make it unfact
Prove the repubs did it on there own
If RWers were bank robbers they would blame the tellers for their crimes.
Pretending that the Republicans nearly destroyed the economy doesn't make it so. Neither the Republicans NOR the Democrats destroyed the Economy, the Banksters did.pretending your party did not nearly distroy the entire world economy with their hisorically failed ideas doesnt make it unfact
Hank Paulson held a gun to Congress' head in 2008: "There will be Martial Law if we dont get the Banker Bailouts". Bankers OWN and RUN the United States.
Pretending they don't doesn't make it so.
That's a bit simplistic, not to mention scapegoating.
Vital elements of Glass-Steagall were eliminated, which was signed by Clinton, and urged by Greenspan, who was himself carrying the water for bankers, actually thinking they might better stablize the banking industry with a novel idea: credit default swaps. I think they actually thought it would help protect the finacial sector. But who knows? Anyway, to most folks in DC, it seemed a good idea at the time, and it passed ... near the end of Clinton's second term.
However, what happened was, banks went hog wild lending to anyone with a pulse, or any EU country that wanted it, as if it were Germany, or any city or county with debt they wanted to refinance, the unemployed wanting homes, you name it -- WITHOUT SUFFICIENT LIQUIDITY backing the risk (the thing in Glass-Steagall that needed eliminating for credit default swap to be legal).
The lending gone wild was not something predicted, but it became very apparent to regulators as being a huge problem, developing at an alarming rate. However, the fees earned from the not-actually-backed-risk loans, were making bankers rich. So instead of correcting the problem, Bush 43 and Paulson further gutted Glass-Steagall, and actively sidelined all regulators sounding any alarms, the most vocal of which, a woman in charge of regulating the Commodities Exchange, was taken down in Congressional hearings, with good old Al Greenspan brought back in to add weight to the forces trying to quiet her.
And whadaya know, what she warned of, came soon after, and we're still climbing out of the clusterfuck.