hjmick
Diamond Member
He ought to consider himself lucky it's only 93%...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're just mad because Trump knocked Natalee Holloway off Hannity's incessant ravings about her. Or was that Nancy Grace? I get the two mixed up sometimes.Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.
I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......
TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative
In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.
At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:
■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).
From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)
It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).
But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.
■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.
For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.
TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative
LiarWhat you claim he said, and what you report he does, is lies.Telling what Trump has said and reporting what he does is not a lieIf that was true, they would not have to lie, and you would not have to defend their lies.
Your own actions, demonstrate that you do not believe your own stated position.
BTW, love your sig...........not many people publicly announce that anyone they agree with is wrong.
We claim based on what he tweets and what he says
No need to lie
Yet you do. So, your actions prove what you said to be false.
Telling what Trump has said and reporting what he does is not a lieYour point has no meritAnd yet, my point about political and cultural trends crossing borders, is still valid and not even contradicted by what you just posted.
So, what was that? Just a flat denial with some slight pretense wrapping?
Ether way, the point stands. The media lies. YOu defend their lies. YOu lie in defense of their lies.
Because it advances your political agenda.
You are a far left ideologue, of the worst sort.
It is not a Democratic conspiracy to make Trump look bad. An independent, international press with their own issues and concerns report on what Trump says and does
They report the same outrage our press does
If that was true, they would not have to lie, and you would not have to defend their lies.
Your own actions, demonstrate that you do not believe your own stated position.
But lying about what he said, is lying.
As you well know. Every post you make pretending otherwise, is a lie.
Video and Trump Tweets do not lie
They show a President who is untrustworthy, a bully, prone to petty insults and inept
If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong
I think the 7% are the rare occasions when he keeps his mouth shut.93% of the crap he does is negative.
Next!
Creptius,
Tell me the 7% positive?
Well probably 99% but don't hold me to the 1% is did good on...
The guy is up on 10,000 lies... Are they looking for a fucking parade?
Went right over your head didn’t it?If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong
Oh man, this is classic! LOL!
What are the odds on how long it will be before RW realizes how idiotic this sig sounds and changes it?
If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong
Oh man, this is classic! LOL!
What are the odds on how long it will be before RW realizes how idiotic this sig sounds and changes it?
Went right over your head didn’t it?
Seriously....you don’t understand it, do you?If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong
Oh man, this is classic! LOL!
What are the odds on how long it will be before RW realizes how idiotic this sig sounds and changes it?
Went right over your head didn’t it?
On the contrary, it seems it went right over yours. Shall we review all the posts of fellow left-wingers to which you've checked "agree" in the past? LOL
If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong
Oh man, this is classic! LOL!
What are the odds on how long it will be before RW realizes how idiotic this sig sounds and changes it?
Went right over your head didn’t it?
On the contrary, it seems it went right over yours. Shall we review all the posts of fellow left-wingers to which you've checked "agree" in the past? LOL
Seriously....you don’t understand it, do you?
Were you home schooled?
[/QUOTE]If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong
Oh man, this is classic! LOL!
What are the odds on how long it will be before RW realizes how idiotic this sig sounds and changes it?
Went right over your head didn’t it?
On the contrary, it seems it went right over yours. Shall we review all the posts of fellow left-wingers to which you've checked "agree" in the past? LOL
Seriously....you don’t understand it, do you?
Were you home schooled?
Yes, I was home schooled to the age of 8, didn't think there was much need to continue after that as I realized I would never have an IQ in the 200s on par with people posting on an internet forum one day in the future. I was also raised by wolves, was born yesterday, and have been under a rock until now. Is that the answer you wanted?
Getting back to the point, do you realize how stupid your sig comes across to us regular folk (which would consist of 99 percent of the people on this forum reading your quote)?
Think you can take it back to Clinton when they marveled at how well he lied.The media has been pretty shameless since Obama announced he was running.
They're not even trying much to hide it at this point.
Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.
I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......
TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative
In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.
At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:
■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).
From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)
It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).
But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.
■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.
For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.
TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative
The only real question; is why the press lets Trump get away with as much as he does?
Donald Trump should be denounced by all the media publicly and in unison. Donald Trump doesn't even qualify as a human.
Nothing more tedious and ridiculous than conservatives whining about ‘the media.’Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.
I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......
TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative
In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.
At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:
■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).
From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)
It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).
But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.
■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.
For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.
TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative
They have been doing it since NixonNothing more tedious and ridiculous than conservatives whining about ‘the media.’Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.
I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......
TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative
In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.
At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:
■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).
From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)
It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).
But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.
■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.
For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.
TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative
Were you lying when you came up with your sig?LiarWhat you claim he said, and what you report he does, is lies.Telling what Trump has said and reporting what he does is not a lieIf that was true, they would not have to lie, and you would not have to defend their lies.
Your own actions, demonstrate that you do not believe your own stated position.
BTW, love your sig...........not many people publicly announce that anyone they agree with is wrong.
We claim based on what he tweets and what he says
No need to lie
Yet you do. So, your actions prove what you said to be false.
They have been doing it since NixonNothing more tedious and ridiculous than conservatives whining about ‘the media.’Why would anyone try to push the idea that the media isn't in the tank for Dimwingers? I'm sure we will have some morons try to make that case in this thread, but they won't be able to bring any data to support their asinine position.
I'm also sure there will be whining and crying about who is reporting these facts......
TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative
In the first 100 days since House Democrats began their impeachment push on September 24, ABC, CBS and NBC have aggressively aided the effort. A Media Research Center analysis finds the Big Three evening newscasts have battered the President with 93% negative coverage and promoted impeachment at the expense of nearly all other Trump news.
At the same time, the broadcast networks donated at least 124 hours of wall-to-wall live coverage as they pre-empted regular programming in favor of House Democrat-led impeachment activities. On the other hand, the networks’ frenzy over impeachment has meant the Democratic presidential candidates have been barely visible on the evening newscasts, even though voting is due to begin in just three weeks. Details:
■ Bad news for President Trump: During impeachment, the networks kept up the same relentless negativity toward President Trump that they first displayed during the 2016 presidential campaign (see here, here and here for past reports, as well as a description of our methodology).
From September 24 through January 1, we tallied 1,053 evaluative comments about the President, 93% of which were negative. (If you can’t wait 700 words, scroll down now to find out how TV news spun their coverage of the 2020 Democrats. Spoiler: It’s NOT 93% negative.)
It’s pretty clear by now that reporters aren’t going to reward the President with much good press even for obvious achievements such as the strong economy or the victory over ISIS terrorists in Syria (including the killing of their elusive leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).
But impeachment has increased the sheer amount of this negative coverage, as well as meant even less airtime for the administration’s policy achievements.
■ Impeachment has taken over the evening news: In the first 100 days since Pelosi announced the start of the House impeachment inquiry on September 24 (through January 1), ABC, CBS and NBC have generated a combined 849 minutes of evening news coverage about the subject.
For comparison, after Special Counsel Robert Mueller was named back on May 17, 2017, it took those same newscasts more than twice as long (until December 29 of that year, or 226 days) to register the same amount of airtime for the Russia investigation. In other words, the networks are spending more than twice as much airtime on the Ukraine probe as they did on the Russia probe.
TV’s Trump News: Three-Fourths Impeachment and 93% Negative