Trump's refusal to disclose tax returns, AND states' proposed legislation

nat4900

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2015
42,021
5,964
1,870
Here's an issue that should warm the hearts of all those states' rights proponents.

Both California and New York are proposing state legislation that would REQUIRE for any candidate who wishes his or her name on a presidential ballot, to show tax returns as a requisite for candidacy.

No doubt there will be challenges in various courts over this requirement and (probably,) the issue of EC versus popular votes when electing a president will also arise as a contentious one.........Interesting !!!
 
Pass the law and it will not stop Trump from winning the Electoral College in 2020 seeing he did not need either state to win it this time.

Pick a damn battle worth fighting!
 
Lol what a stupid idea. I thought those faggots wanted to secede anyways? :dunno:
 
Here's an issue that should warm the hearts of all those states' rights proponents.

Both California and New York are proposing state legislation that would REQUIRE for any candidate who wishes his or her name on a presidential ballot, to show tax returns as a requisite for candidacy.

No doubt there will be challenges in various courts over this requirement and (probably,) the issue of EC versus popular votes when electing a president will also arise as a contentious one.........Interesting !!!

interesting.

and with luck it wont'

th
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Pass the law and it will not stop Trump from winning the Electoral College in 2020 seeing he did not need either state to win it this time.

Pick a damn battle worth fighting!

Forgot to mention that there's similar proposals in such states as PA, WI, and OH.....
 
Here's an issue that should warm the hearts of all those states' rights proponents.

Both California and New York are proposing state legislation that would REQUIRE for any candidate who wishes his or her name on a presidential ballot, to show tax returns as a requisite for candidacy.

No doubt there will be challenges in various courts over this requirement and (probably,) the issue of EC versus popular votes when electing a president will also arise as a contentious one.........Interesting !!!
Damn, been 24 hours since I had to use this video, but with the stupid liberals(redundant statement) on this site, I just keep dragging it out time and again.

 
Here's an issue that should warm the hearts of all those states' rights proponents.

Both California and New York are proposing state legislation that would REQUIRE for any candidate who wishes his or her name on a presidential ballot, to show tax returns as a requisite for candidacy.

No doubt there will be challenges in various courts over this requirement and (probably,) the issue of EC versus popular votes when electing a president will also arise as a contentious one.........Interesting !!!

Sounds great! I don't think the Founding Fathers envisioned electricity and how it would change communications. They lived IN their time and thought that a guy on a fast horse with a satchel to hold a letter would be the only way to communicate and connect with their countrymen. (The interview with David McCullough on "60 Minutes" last Sunday was such an eye-opener.)

From Time interview: "
President Trump has expressed admiration for Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay, Douglas MacArthur and George Patton. What does that say about the type of leader he aspires to be?

He's said he does not read history, or presidential biographies, because, as he said, he has a mind that can reach beyond all that. That’s utter nonsense. That’s ego-centric illusion. To me, it’s as if we’ve put someone in the pilot seat who has never flown a plane or even read about how you do it. So we have to cope with it, by counteracting that, with young people coming along that realize that this is a lesson in how not to be a leader.""""
 
Damn, been 24 hours since I had to use this video, but with the stupid liberals(redundant statement) on this site, I just keep dragging it out time and again.

Wanna see some more pictures of Romney supporters upon losing?

3bc3f5-20121107-romneyreax1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Here's an issue that should warm the hearts of all those states' rights proponents.

Both California and New York are proposing state legislation that would REQUIRE for any candidate who wishes his or her name on a presidential ballot, to show tax returns as a requisite for candidacy.

No doubt there will be challenges in various courts over this requirement and (probably,) the issue of EC versus popular votes when electing a president will also arise as a contentious one.........Interesting !!!

Federal elections are the prevue of the federal government. Figures CA & NY don't know this. Dumbfucks.
 
Here's an issue that should warm the hearts of all those states' rights proponents.

Both California and New York are proposing state legislation that would REQUIRE for any candidate who wishes his or her name on a presidential ballot, to show tax returns as a requisite for candidacy.

No doubt there will be challenges in various courts over this requirement and (probably,) the issue of EC versus popular votes when electing a president will also arise as a contentious one.........Interesting !!!

That's probably a 4th Amendment violation.
 
Federal elections are the prevue of the federal government. Figures CA & NY don't know this. Dumbfucks.

So your day is not completely wasted...as usual........Learn something....(note numbers 2 and 4 below):

States may regulate candidate ballot access or write-in candidacies as part of their general regulatory power over federal, state or local elections.

States regulate candidate ballot access to further their interests in: ·

1. holding orderly elections with serious, rather than frivolous, contenders, ·

2. promoting electoral integrity ·

3. limiting voter confusion caused by lengthy ballots, ·

4. preventing fraud ·

5. enhancing political stability by increasing the likelihood that the winner receives a majority of the votes,

6. and · supporting finality by reducing the need for run-off elections.

A state may regulate both primary and general election ballot access and may set stricter standards for the general election because of the state’s legitimate interest in reserving the general election for major political struggles

http://www.electionlawissues.org/Re...ites/Files/election/ChapterTwo - Proofed2.pdf
 

Forum List

Back
Top