Trump’s abandonment of Paris climate deal to cost U.S. economy trillions, new study reveals

Discussion in 'Energy' started by Jessica123, Jun 1, 2018.

  1. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    58,562
    Thanks Received:
    7,102
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,495
    What’s the legacy of the Stern Review?
    How have its conclusions held up over time?

    Andrew Steer, president of the World Resources Institute: The legacy is exceedingly important. Until then, economists didn’t really focus adequately on issues of climate change or at least they had a relatively naive review of things. What the Stern Review did is by careful way of marshalling evidence of costs and benefits, it provided a massive leap forward in our understanding of the economics of climate change.

    The conclusions have stayed correct but the messages would be much stronger if it were written today than they were then. The case for action is much more clear today than it was back then. That’s partly because technology has changed, making the transition to a low carbon future much more cost-effective. Second, because we’re 10 years on, the problem has become more obvious. Essentially, the costs of inaction have gone up and costs of action have come down a lot.

    Kate Gordon, vice chair of climate and sustainable urbanization at the Paulson Institute: The Stern Review was critically important in moving the climate issue from one of science to one of economics. It has inspired a huge amount of work afterward, including the Risky Business Project, which in its pilot phase was actually known as “the Stern Review for the U.S.” So its legacy is one of opening the door to a sober economic conversation about the implications of climate change, which is critically important. Its specific conclusions may be less useful as we move from climate diplomacy to the operational phase of climate mitigation, as those economic and workforce development strategies are profoundly local and must be done at a far more granular level than the Stern Review used.

    Amir Jina, postdoctoral researcher at the University of Chicago: Two main contributions stand out to me. First, maybe more than any other single publication, the Stern Review helped to reframe climate change as an economic issue, not just a scientific one. Second, it provided the research community with a strong motivation to discuss some of the thornier questions about climate change economics — the debate about how we value the future being perhaps the most obvious one. There's a downside to the latter, in that it maybe made us focus too much in the past decade on issues that were in the review rather than all the evidence that wasn't in there.

    10 Years on, Climate Economists Reflect on Stern Review

    The Stern report can be had for free in it's entirety.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. elektra
    Online

    elektra Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,241
    Thanks Received:
    661
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Temecula California
    Ratings:
    +2,385
    This is an accurate OP. It will cost trillions upon trillion upon trillions, for years to build Solar and Wind power. Most of the time required is to print the money. We can build Solar panels and Wind power 24/7, but it will take years to print the trillions of dollars to pay for them.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    58,562
    Thanks Received:
    7,102
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,495
    Poor little Miss Elektra, just has not caught up yet with even the 20th century, let alone the 21st. Cannot realize that most of wealth transfers do not involve cash at all, just numbers on a computer.
     
  4. bear513
    Online

    bear513 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2012
    Messages:
    42,066
    Thanks Received:
    5,388
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +27,029

    Then why did obozo send a pallet full of money to Iran that the left insists wasn't "Ransom" money????
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  5. elektra
    Online

    elektra Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,241
    Thanks Received:
    661
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Temecula California
    Ratings:
    +2,385
    How about replying in the Tesla Sucks thread where you put both feet in your mouth. How many electric cars, millions right! Ha, ha, ha. Hey, they counted toy slot cars to get that number, right? You got balls here but not where you opened your big mouth and stuffed both feet in.

    Wealth transfers? So Solar and Wind energy are simply wealth transfers. Yep, I agree. A big giant scam to transfer wealth to those the DemoRATS choose.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. MarathonMike
    Offline

    MarathonMike Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9,277
    Thanks Received:
    2,825
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    The Southwestern Desert
    Ratings:
    +16,472
    OMFG Liberal Think Tanks and their so called "studies". :puhleeze:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  7. elektra
    Online

    elektra Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2013
    Messages:
    7,241
    Thanks Received:
    661
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Temecula California
    Ratings:
    +2,385
    ask them to post or link, they cant
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  8. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    58,562
    Thanks Received:
    7,102
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,495
    Silly ass, that was Iran's money that we froze when they took our embassy. You 'Conservatives' are so fucking ignorant.
     
  9. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    58,562
    Thanks Received:
    7,102
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,495
  10. westwall
    Online

    westwall Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    56,221
    Thanks Received:
    12,103
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +40,927




    Have you read that bullshit you posted? I doubt it. It is based on model after model after model. And loads of opinion. There is no actual hard science anywhere within that ridiculous "report".

    How about coming up with a link to something factual.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2

Share This Page