- May 20, 2009
- 144,424
- 66,817
- 2,330
Judge rejects Trump DNA offer in E Jean Carroll rape defamation case | Donald Trump | The Guardianalong with other cases
uh-huh. they did. why didn't donny just give it up if he had nothing to fear?
why did he delay delay delay. 'eh? yaaaaaaaaaaaaa...... we both know why.
Dress in Hand, Rape Accuser Goes After Trump DNA
Lawyers for an author who says President Donald Trump raped her in the 1990s asked Thursday that he provide a DNA sample to see if it matches stains left on the dress she was wearing.
AMANDA OTTAWAY / January 30, 2020
“Testing unidentified male DNA on the dress she wore during that assault has become standard operating procedure in these circumstances given the remarkable advances in DNA technology, particularly where, as is the case here, other potential contributors have been excluded,” Kaplan added. “As a result, we’ve requested a simple saliva sample from Mr. Trump to test his DNA, and there really is no valid basis for him to object.”
Dress in Hand, Rape Accuser Goes After Trump DNA
Judge rules E. Jean Carroll can continue to seek Trump’s DNA in defamation suit
By Erica Orden
3 minute read
Updated 3:09 PM EDT, Fri August 7, 2020
New YorkCNN —
A New York state Supreme Court judge on Thursday denied President Donald Trump’s effort to delay the proceedings in a defamation lawsuit filed against him by longtime magazine columnist E. Jean Carroll, a move that allows her to pursue his DNA sample in an effort to prove claims he sexually assaulted her in the 1990s.
n January, attorneys for Carroll served an attorney for Trump with papers requesting a sample of his DNA to compare with male genetic material found on the black Donna Karan dress Carroll says she wore during the alleged encounter at Bergdorf’s.
That request was put on hold in the wake of an order from the judge that halted discovery requests until Trump’s motion to stay the case has been decided.
Trump’s lawyers had argued to the court that the Carroll case should be delayed until a state appeals court rules in another, similar case brought by former “Apprentice” contestant Summer Zervos on the question of whether the state courts have jurisdiction over him while he occupies the White House.
But lawyers for Carroll said Trump shouldn’t be allowed to delay the case in light of the fact that he has both continued to handle other cases as a defendant while serving as President and has also continued to file lawsuits. They submitted further arguments in the wake of the Vance ruling, arguing that it should permit their case to move forward.
The judge agreed, paving the way for Carroll’s efforts to seek Trump’s DNA.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/07/politics/e-jean-carroll-trump-dna/index.html
gots anything else, francis?
This trumps your 4 year old articles