Trump Orders The Truth To Be Revealed

[Meathead]

He made the trains run on time

No he didn't. God Himself could not have made the trains run on time in 1930s Italy, or today for that matter.

 

[Meathead]

I would love to know what is in those files.

But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?

His tax returns would be more appropriate

Trump's returns will be released in 55 years. Give you something to whine about for the rest of your life.

Speaking of whining, would you care to explain your claims that I am wanting to rewrite history or that I resemble Stalin?

Or do you prefer to just spout bullshit and walk away?

"But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?"

You don't want the truth, you want a "truth"'for whatever garbled reason. What happened in 1963 happened in 1963. That's called a tautology.

First you claim I am in favor of revisionist history. Then you say I am like Stalin. But the only actual detail you give is the claim that I repeated the same thing using different words? Wow. That is a rather amazing leap of logic.

But no, I am simply saying that revealing the truth about something more relevant would be preferable to revealing the truth about an assasination that happened over 50 years ago.

Like maybe the truth about the recent ambush of American soldiers by ISIS. Like the truth about why their air support was french and not American. Why the french would provide air support but be unwilling to fire a shot. Or why, when our troops finally did receive support, it was from independent contractors who bailed without doing a headcount, thereby sentencing one of our soldiers to death.

You know, relevant truths.

You're really losing it there Winter. You know, they say Mussolini was syphilitic.

 

[Marion Morrison]

I would love to know what is in those files.

But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?

Yes, revisionist history is always better.

No, decades old truths don't matter as much as recent & relevant ones do.

Whoah!

"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it." - George Santayana
Read more at: George Santayana Quotes

I tell ya wut, it's like pulling teeth to research the i-net for that, when the saying was commonplace when I was in school.

I think they're trying to do away with that one.

 

[WinterBorn]

His tax returns would be more appropriate

Trump's returns will be released in 55 years. Give you something to whine about for the rest of your life.

Speaking of whining, would you care to explain your claims that I am wanting to rewrite history or that I resemble Stalin?

Or do you prefer to just spout bullshit and walk away?

"But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?"

You don't want the truth, you want a "truth"'for whatever garbled reason. What happened in 1963 happened in 1963. That's called a tautology.

First you claim I am in favor of revisionist history. Then you say I am like Stalin. But the only actual detail you give is the claim that I repeated the same thing using different words? Wow. That is a rather amazing leap of logic.

But no, I am simply saying that revealing the truth about something more relevant would be preferable to revealing the truth about an assasination that happened over 50 years ago.

Like maybe the truth about the recent ambush of American soldiers by ISIS. Like the truth about why their air support was french and not American. Why the french would provide air support but be unwilling to fire a shot. Or why, when our troops finally did receive support, it was from independent contractors who bailed without doing a headcount, thereby sentencing one of our soldiers to death.

You know, relevant truths.

You're really losing it there Winter. You know, they say Mussolini was syphilitic.

I am not losing anything. I am actually enjoying watching you dance around what you said.

What history am I calling to be revised? Can you answer that simple question?

 

[WinterBorn]

I would love to know what is in those files.

But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?

Yes, revisionist history is always better.

No, decades old truths don't matter as much as recent & relevant ones do.

Whoah!

"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it." - George Santayana
Read more at: George Santayana Quotes

I tell ya wut, it's like pulling teeth to research the i-net for that, when the saying was commonplace when I was in school.

I think they're trying to do away with that one.

I am not saying old truths are worthless. But the more recent truths would allow us to make changes to improve our world. Knowing who killed Kennedy, who authorized it or covered it up will not do that. The people responsible are long gone. Or at least long retired.

 

[Meathead]

Trump's returns will be released in 55 years. Give you something to whine about for the rest of your life.

Speaking of whining, would you care to explain your claims that I am wanting to rewrite history or that I resemble Stalin?

Or do you prefer to just spout bullshit and walk away?

"But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?"

You don't want the truth, you want a "truth"'for whatever garbled reason. What happened in 1963 happened in 1963. That's called a tautology.

First you claim I am in favor of revisionist history. Then you say I am like Stalin. But the only actual detail you give is the claim that I repeated the same thing using different words? Wow. That is a rather amazing leap of logic.

But no, I am simply saying that revealing the truth about something more relevant would be preferable to revealing the truth about an assasination that happened over 50 years ago.

Like maybe the truth about the recent ambush of American soldiers by ISIS. Like the truth about why their air support was french and not American. Why the french would provide air support but be unwilling to fire a shot. Or why, when our troops finally did receive support, it was from independent contractors who bailed without doing a headcount, thereby sentencing one of our soldiers to death.

You know, relevant truths.

You're really losing it there Winter. You know, they say Mussolini was syphilitic.

I am not losing anything. I am actually enjoying watching you dance around what you said.

What history am I calling to be revised? Can you answer that simple question?

I wasn't saying you are syphilitic, just a possibility. Some people are just nuts I guess.

 

[WinterBorn]

Speaking of whining, would you care to explain your claims that I am wanting to rewrite history or that I resemble Stalin?

Or do you prefer to just spout bullshit and walk away?

"But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?"

You don't want the truth, you want a "truth"'for whatever garbled reason. What happened in 1963 happened in 1963. That's called a tautology.

First you claim I am in favor of revisionist history. Then you say I am like Stalin. But the only actual detail you give is the claim that I repeated the same thing using different words? Wow. That is a rather amazing leap of logic.

But no, I am simply saying that revealing the truth about something more relevant would be preferable to revealing the truth about an assasination that happened over 50 years ago.

Like maybe the truth about the recent ambush of American soldiers by ISIS. Like the truth about why their air support was french and not American. Why the french would provide air support but be unwilling to fire a shot. Or why, when our troops finally did receive support, it was from independent contractors who bailed without doing a headcount, thereby sentencing one of our soldiers to death.

You know, relevant truths.

You're really losing it there Winter. You know, they say Mussolini was syphilitic.

I am not losing anything. I am actually enjoying watching you dance around what you said.

What history am I calling to be revised? Can you answer that simple question?

I wasn't saying you are syphilitic, just a possibility. Some people are just nuts I guess.

I didn't think you would answer the question.

 

[jc456]

I would love to know what is in those files.

But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?

Dude how long is a century? Hahahaha

Would 55 years be within 100 years? Bhwaaaaa

 

[WinterBorn]

I would love to know what is in those files.

But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?

Dude how long is a century? Hahahaha

If I had said "Maybe something from the last century" you might have a point. I didn't. I said "...this century." That means within the current century. You know, since 2001?

 

[jc456]

I would love to know what is in those files.

But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?

Dude how long is a century? Hahahaha

If I had said "Maybe something from the last century" you might have a point. I didn't. I said "...this century." That means within the current century. You know, since 2001?

 

[Dschrute3]

I really like what Trump's doing, but what are the odds the CIA would have missed any evidence of its killing the President? I don't see how any evidence could still exist. The CIA would have destroyed it all. But it's still gonna be interesting sifting through this new material. Happy Hunting folks.

 

[usmbguest5318]

What exactly is there to come of knowing the remaining details about an event that happened in 1963 and that cannot be undone? At best people with nothing better to do will be able to make myriad "if such and such had not happened" statements.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Redaction city here we come...

 

[Aletheia4u]

 

[deanrd]

Trump wouldn't know the truth if it bit him on one of his tiny orange balls.

 

[J.E.D]

I would love to know what is in those files.

But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?

Dude how long is a century? Hahahaha

Would 55 years be within 100 years? Bhwaaaaa

 

[Aletheia4u]

 

[oreo]

For decades the US govt has kept the truth from the American people ... until now:

Trump Says He Will Release Final Set of Documents on Kennedy Assassination

I imagine he will too, it will take some of the news off of him for the time being---

 

[rightwinger]

Conspiracy nutjobs are preparing all kinds of bizarre interpretations of what the newly released information contains

 

[jc456]

I would love to know what is in those files.

But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?

Dude how long is a century? Hahahaha

Would 55 years be within 100 years? Bhwaaaaa

just making a point of fact. unless of course you don't think 55 years is within a 100 years.