Meathead
Diamond Member
No he didn't. God Himself could not have made the trains run on time in 1930s Italy, or today for that matter.He made the trains run on time
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No he didn't. God Himself could not have made the trains run on time in 1930s Italy, or today for that matter.He made the trains run on time
You're really losing it there Winter. You know, they say Mussolini was syphilitic."But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?"Trump's returns will be released in 55 years. Give you something to whine about for the rest of your life.His tax returns would be more appropriateI would love to know what is in those files.
But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?
Speaking of whining, would you care to explain your claims that I am wanting to rewrite history or that I resemble Stalin?
Or do you prefer to just spout bullshit and walk away?
You don't want the truth, you want a "truth"'for whatever garbled reason. What happened in 1963 happened in 1963. That's called a tautology.
First you claim I am in favor of revisionist history. Then you say I am like Stalin. But the only actual detail you give is the claim that I repeated the same thing using different words? Wow. That is a rather amazing leap of logic.
But no, I am simply saying that revealing the truth about something more relevant would be preferable to revealing the truth about an assasination that happened over 50 years ago.
Like maybe the truth about the recent ambush of American soldiers by ISIS. Like the truth about why their air support was french and not American. Why the french would provide air support but be unwilling to fire a shot. Or why, when our troops finally did receive support, it was from independent contractors who bailed without doing a headcount, thereby sentencing one of our soldiers to death.
You know, relevant truths.
Yes, revisionist history is always better.I would love to know what is in those files.
But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?
No, decades old truths don't matter as much as recent & relevant ones do.
You're really losing it there Winter. You know, they say Mussolini was syphilitic."But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?"Trump's returns will be released in 55 years. Give you something to whine about for the rest of your life.His tax returns would be more appropriate
Speaking of whining, would you care to explain your claims that I am wanting to rewrite history or that I resemble Stalin?
Or do you prefer to just spout bullshit and walk away?
You don't want the truth, you want a "truth"'for whatever garbled reason. What happened in 1963 happened in 1963. That's called a tautology.
First you claim I am in favor of revisionist history. Then you say I am like Stalin. But the only actual detail you give is the claim that I repeated the same thing using different words? Wow. That is a rather amazing leap of logic.
But no, I am simply saying that revealing the truth about something more relevant would be preferable to revealing the truth about an assasination that happened over 50 years ago.
Like maybe the truth about the recent ambush of American soldiers by ISIS. Like the truth about why their air support was french and not American. Why the french would provide air support but be unwilling to fire a shot. Or why, when our troops finally did receive support, it was from independent contractors who bailed without doing a headcount, thereby sentencing one of our soldiers to death.
You know, relevant truths.
Yes, revisionist history is always better.I would love to know what is in those files.
But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?
No, decades old truths don't matter as much as recent & relevant ones do.
Whoah!
"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it." - George Santayana
Read more at: George Santayana Quotes
I tell ya wut, it's like pulling teeth to research the i-net for that, when the saying was commonplace when I was in school.
I think they're trying to do away with that one.
I wasn't saying you are syphilitic, just a possibility. Some people are just nuts I guess.You're really losing it there Winter. You know, they say Mussolini was syphilitic."But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?"Trump's returns will be released in 55 years. Give you something to whine about for the rest of your life.
Speaking of whining, would you care to explain your claims that I am wanting to rewrite history or that I resemble Stalin?
Or do you prefer to just spout bullshit and walk away?
You don't want the truth, you want a "truth"'for whatever garbled reason. What happened in 1963 happened in 1963. That's called a tautology.
First you claim I am in favor of revisionist history. Then you say I am like Stalin. But the only actual detail you give is the claim that I repeated the same thing using different words? Wow. That is a rather amazing leap of logic.
But no, I am simply saying that revealing the truth about something more relevant would be preferable to revealing the truth about an assasination that happened over 50 years ago.
Like maybe the truth about the recent ambush of American soldiers by ISIS. Like the truth about why their air support was french and not American. Why the french would provide air support but be unwilling to fire a shot. Or why, when our troops finally did receive support, it was from independent contractors who bailed without doing a headcount, thereby sentencing one of our soldiers to death.
You know, relevant truths.
I am not losing anything. I am actually enjoying watching you dance around what you said.
What history am I calling to be revised? Can you answer that simple question?
I wasn't saying you are syphilitic, just a possibility. Some people are just nuts I guess.You're really losing it there Winter. You know, they say Mussolini was syphilitic."But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?"Speaking of whining, would you care to explain your claims that I am wanting to rewrite history or that I resemble Stalin?
Or do you prefer to just spout bullshit and walk away?
You don't want the truth, you want a "truth"'for whatever garbled reason. What happened in 1963 happened in 1963. That's called a tautology.
First you claim I am in favor of revisionist history. Then you say I am like Stalin. But the only actual detail you give is the claim that I repeated the same thing using different words? Wow. That is a rather amazing leap of logic.
But no, I am simply saying that revealing the truth about something more relevant would be preferable to revealing the truth about an assasination that happened over 50 years ago.
Like maybe the truth about the recent ambush of American soldiers by ISIS. Like the truth about why their air support was french and not American. Why the french would provide air support but be unwilling to fire a shot. Or why, when our troops finally did receive support, it was from independent contractors who bailed without doing a headcount, thereby sentencing one of our soldiers to death.
You know, relevant truths.
I am not losing anything. I am actually enjoying watching you dance around what you said.
What history am I calling to be revised? Can you answer that simple question?
Dude how long is a century? HahahahaI would love to know what is in those files.
But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?
Dude how long is a century? HahahahaI would love to know what is in those files.
But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?
Dude how long is a century? HahahahaI would love to know what is in those files.
But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?
If I had said "Maybe something from the last century" you might have a point. I didn't. I said "...this century." That means within the current century. You know, since 2001?
Dude how long is a century? HahahahaI would love to know what is in those files.
But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?
Would 55 years be within 100 years? Bhwaaaaa
For decades the US govt has kept the truth from the American people ... until now:
Trump Says He Will Release Final Set of Documents on Kennedy Assassination
just making a point of fact. unless of course you don't think 55 years is within a 100 years.Dude how long is a century? HahahahaI would love to know what is in those files.
But if Trump is going to reveal any truths, I would prefer they not be 55 year old truths. Maybe something from this century?
Would 55 years be within 100 years? Bhwaaaaa