Trump on track to win reelection by landslide according to economic models predictions

Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Actually, the dot.com crash occurred in March and by November a whole generation of Americans was watching their retire savings vanishing. Add to this that Gore had absolutely no charisma and it is easy to see how Bush overcame Gore's large early lead. Whether you agree or not, the polls show the majority of Americans give Trump credit for the economy and it will be very difficult for any of the prospective Democratic candidates to even make a contest out of it.

Voters oppose Trump on a broad range of issues. The number 1 issue in 2018 was healthcare and voters overwhelmingly trust Democrats on the issue. There are a number of issues Democrats could run on.

Yes there are many issues the dems are running on, please see the following compilation:
1. Open borders, tear down the southern border fence/wall
2. Sanctuary cities & states
3. Free college
4. Single Payer Healthcare, aka rationed healthcare
5. Eliminate ICE and DHS, turn the US into the EU, with muslim "no go zones"
6. Promote Globalism, whatever Wall Street wants Wall Street gets, see K-Street Cash
7. Paris Climate Change Treaty where the US pays $trillions to poor countries
8. Stupid trade agreements, e.g tax breaks to move factories overseas
9. Let China run roughshod over the US for trade and intellectual property
10. Let NK develop nukes and ICBM delivery systems, have no one capable of dealing with NK
11. Raise taxes, especially on corporations so they relocate overseas
12. Max food stamps instead of good paying jobs
13. Opioid problem running rampant across the US
14. Gangs like MS-13 running rampant across the US
15. No steel or mining industries due to foreign "dumping" of subsidized products
16. No new pipelines
17. No offshore drilling
18. No privacy as tech giants like google and facebook work with dems to promote liberalism
19. Colleges only allow liberal speakers and professors who indoctrinate kids to be liberals or flunk out
20. The dems' "Central Committee" appoints super-delegates to subvert real voters in primaries
21. Pack the US Supreme Court to promote liberal policies
22. Impeach anyone they deem not liberal enough, like Kavanaugh
23. Use the Federal Government to punish conservatives, like the IRS and Lois Lerner hounded conservatives
24. Use the Intel community to spy on the opposition party, like Hillary, FusionGPS, and the FBI/DOJ spied on Trump and paid for the phony Steele Dossier
25. Sell US secrets like Wen Ho Lee sold nuke secrets to China, and Obama/Hillary sold uranium to the Russians via the UraniumOne scam
26. Have the Black Panthers or antifa guard urban polling stations with clubs to keep conservative voters away, guarantee those 300,000 to 0 results
27. Do not allow conservative blacks on TV, keep those urban plantations 100% democrat.
28. Allow the aclu, and BLM to protect criminals and put blue lives in danger.
29. Hire bimbos to swear that they were sexually assaulted by the GOP candidates.
30. Block voter ID laws to ensure fraud, and promote "vote harvesting" to steal elections
31. Democrats refuse to provide funding for border walls/security, which DHS says is desperately needed.
32. Democrats want to give $Trillions to Mexico and Central America for a Marshal Plan, but won't help US citizens living in tent cities
33. Impose gun control, outlaw private gun sales, outlaw AR style rifles, restrict sales of bullets, etc.
34. "Green New Deal" Impose a "carbon tax" to punish anyone who works, heats their home, flies, or has a car
35. Anti-business democrat socialists caused Amazon to flee NYC taking 25,000 good paying jobs to VA
36. REPARATIONS to blacks to pay for slavery, $trillions owed by US voters
37. Trump has Navarro and Lightheiser managing economic & Trade Policy, to bring back good jobs the dems have no one
38. Promote or excuse the murder of newborns, i.e. "infantacide"
39. Change the Electoral College to popular vote
 
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.

Unemployment was not down when Trump took office.
Unemployment in 2016 Monthly Unemployment November 2016 - CSO - Central Statistics Office

Nov. 2016 at 7.3
Nov. 2017 at 4.1
It had everything to do with Trump.

What a dishonest little shit you are, use the CSO number for 2016 and the BLS number for 2017.

Let’s add the light of truth to your bullshit...

BLS:
Nov 2016: 4.7
Nov 2017: 4.2


CSO:
Nov 2016: 7.3
Nov 2017: 6.1




Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
If any good numbers went down after Trump took office, it's the fault of the snowflakes resisting every god damn thing Trump did.
 
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.

Unemployment was not down when Trump took office.
Unemployment in 2016 Monthly Unemployment November 2016 - CSO - Central Statistics Office

Nov. 2016 at 7.3
Nov. 2017 at 4.1
It had everything to do with Trump.

What a dishonest little shit you are, use the CSO number for 2016 and the BLS number for 2017.

Let’s add the light of truth to your bullshit...

BLS:
Nov 2016: 4.7
Nov 2017: 4.2


CSO:
Nov 2016: 7.3
Nov 2017: 6.1




Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.

Unemployment was not down when Trump took office.
Unemployment in 2016 Monthly Unemployment November 2016 - CSO - Central Statistics Office

Nov. 2016 at 7.3
Nov. 2017 at 4.1
It had everything to do with Trump.

What a dishonest little shit you are, use the CSO number for 2016 and the BLS number for 2017.

Let’s add the light of truth to your bullshit...

BLS:
Nov 2016: 4.7
Nov 2017: 4.2


CSO:
Nov 2016: 7.3
Nov 2017: 6.1




Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com


Sorry that's the wrong web site on Ireland, which belongs in another different discussion. Oops!

The Strange Ups and Downs of the U.S. Economy Since 1929

GDP growth 2016 = 1.6%
GDP growth 2017 = 2.2%

Unemployment rate held at 4.1 percent in November 2017 : The Economics Daily: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Unemployment Nov. 2016 4.7
Unemployment Nov. 2017 4.1
 
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.

Unemployment was not down when Trump took office.
Unemployment in 2016 Monthly Unemployment November 2016 - CSO - Central Statistics Office

Nov. 2016 at 7.3
Nov. 2017 at 4.1
It had everything to do with Trump.

What a dishonest little shit you are, use the CSO number for 2016 and the BLS number for 2017.

Let’s add the light of truth to your bullshit...

BLS:
Nov 2016: 4.7
Nov 2017: 4.2


CSO:
Nov 2016: 7.3
Nov 2017: 6.1




Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.
Economic models indicate Trump on track to win re-election in 'landslide': report

No surprise. I said this as early as a year ago he would win in Reagan 1984 fashion.

Not going to happen. Trump will likely lose his re-election bid. In 2000, the economy was good so Gore should have won in a landslide. The fact is that unemployment was down when Trump took office. There is no evidence any of this has anything to do with Trump. If so then Republicans would have retained the House. Voters have serious concerns about issues such as healthcare in this country.

Unemployment was not down when Trump took office.
Unemployment in 2016 Monthly Unemployment November 2016 - CSO - Central Statistics Office

Nov. 2016 at 7.3
Nov. 2017 at 4.1
It had everything to do with Trump.

What a dishonest little shit you are, use the CSO number for 2016 and the BLS number for 2017.

Let’s add the light of truth to your bullshit...

BLS:
Nov 2016: 4.7
Nov 2017: 4.2


CSO:
Nov 2016: 7.3
Nov 2017: 6.1




Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com


Sorry that's the wrong web site on Ireland, which belongs in another different discussion. Oops!

The Strange Ups and Downs of the U.S. Economy Since 1929

GDP growth 2016 = 1.6%
GDP growth 2017 = 2.2%

Unemployment rate held at 4.1 percent in November 2017 : The Economics Daily: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Unemployment Nov. 2016 4.7
Unemployment Nov. 2017 4.1

Try this one...

Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

no change after the election

upload_2019-3-22_14-25-24.png


GDP...not much change either...

upload_2019-3-22_14-26-27.png
 
But the Asshole Model shows that his support might develop a crack right down the middle.......
 

Forum List

Back
Top