Trump is Right About Preventing Muslim Immigration to the USA Using Current Law

[JimBowie1958]

As long as Trump is not going to specify the Muslim religion, he can enforce the current immigration law to in effect ban Muslim entry if they want to enforce Sharia Law as part of our civil law or to advocate violence against any group of people.

ilink | USCIS

Sec. 313. [8 U.S.C. 1424]

405(b) , no person shall hereafter be naturalized as a citizen of the United States-

(1) who advocates or teaches, or who is a member of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches, opposition to all organized government; or

(2) who is a member of or affiliated with (A) the Communist Party of the United States; (B) any other totalitarian party of the United States; (C) the Communist Political Association; (D) the Communist or other totalitarian party of any State of the United States, of any foreign state, or of any political or geographical subdivision of any foreign state; (E) any section, subsidiary, branch, affiliate, or subdivision of any such association or party; or (F) the direct predecessors or successors of a ny such association or party, regardless of what name such group or organization may have used, may now bear, or may hereafter adopt, unless such alien establishes that he did not have knowledge or reason to believe at the time he became a member of or affiliated with such an organization (and did not thereafter and prior to the date upon which such organization was so registered or so required to be registered have such knowledge or reason to believe) that such organization was a Communist-front organization; or

(3) who, although not within any of the other provisions of this section, advocates the economic, international, and governmental doctrines of world communism or the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship, or who is a member of or affiliated with any organization that advocates the economic, international, and governmental doctrines of world communism or the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship, either through its own utterances or through any written or printed publications issued or published by or with the permission or consent of or under authority of such organizations or paid for by the funds of such organization; or

(4) who advocates or teaches or who is a member of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches (A) the overthrow by force or violence or other unconstitutional means of the Government of the United States or of all forms of law; or (B) the duty, necessity, or propriety of the unlawful assaulting or killing of any officer or officers (either of specific individuals or of officers generally) of the Government of the United States or of any other organized government because of his o r their official character; or (C) the unlawful damage, injury, or destruction of property; or (D) sabotage; or

(5) who writes or publishes or causes to be written or published, or who knowingly circulates, distributes, prints, or displays, or knowingly causes to be circulated, distributed, printed, published, or displayed or who knowingly has in his possession for the purpose of circulation, publication, distribution, or display, any written or printed matter, advocating or teaching opposition to all organized government, or advocating (A) the overthrow by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means of the Government of the United States or of all forms of law; or (B) the duty, necessity, or propriety of the unlawful assaulting or killing of any officer or officers (either of specific individuals or of officers generally) of the Government of the United States or of any other organized government, because of his or their official character; or (C) the unlawful damage, injury, or destruction of property; or (D) sabotage; or (E) the economic, international, and governmental doctrines of world communism or the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship; or

(6) who is a member of or affiliated with any organization, that writes, circulates, distributes, prints, publishes, or displays, or causes to be written, circulated, distributed, printed, published, or displayed, or that has in its possession for the purpose of circulation, distribution, publication, issue, or display, any written or printed matter of the character described in subparagraph (5).

(b) The provisions of this section or of any other section of this Act shall not be construed as declaring that any of the organizations referred to in this section or in any other section of this Act do not advocate the overthrow of the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.

(c) The provisions of this section shall be applicable to any applicant for naturalization who at any time within a period of ten years immediately preceding the filing of the application for naturalization or after such filing and before taking the final oath of citizenship is, or has been found to be within any of the classes enumerated within this section, notwithstanding that at the time the application is filed he may not be included within such classes.

(d) Any person who is within any of the classes described in subsection (a) solely because of past membership in, or past affiliation with, a party or organization may be naturalized without regard to the provisions of subsection (c) if such person establishes that such membership or affiliation is or was involuntary, or occurred and terminated prior to the attainment by such alien of the age of sixteen years, or that such membership or affiliation is or was by operation of law, or was for purposes of obtaining employment, food rations, or other essentials of living and where necessary for such purposes.

A decision by the President that members of Salafi Jihadist groups is a basis for denying entry based on section 4 and 5 of this section would in effect ban a good many Muslims, and an interpretation that, unless one renounces the civil law portions of the Hadith and Quran, a Muslim may not immigrate to the USA, as their religion over laps into civil law areas in this case.

In addition to all of this, Trump can prioritize which nations have their visas processed and approved over other nations, regardless of what Congress does. Remember that little tid bit, Dhiimmicrats? It's right out of Obamy's play book and you have been peachy keen with that one so far.

 

[Pete7469]

You can bet your asses that if muzbots voted republicrat the bed wetters would have demanded an immigration ban on September 11th 2001.

As it stands, even though the cult of slavery and death is notoriously barbaric, kills queers, abuses women and rapes animals, they can get away with it because they vote democrook when they get here.

You know why? They know as well as the rest of us that the democrooks are the enemy of the American people, and thus the friend of the muzbots. The democrooks never fail to over look just how repugnant the cult is in regards to libturd "values" but since they have a common enemy they pretend the mooselimbs love queers, adore women, and are vegans.

 

[JimBowie1958]

You can bet your asses that if muzbots voted republicrat the bed wetters would have demanded an immigration ban on September 11th 2001.

Sure, Obama has already decreased Christian immigration from the same countries he is making plenty of room for with their Mulsim population.

Why is he opening up our borders to 200,000 Muslims that have as many as an estimated 20,000 ISIS supporters and keeping immigration of Christian Syrians to a bare minimum when the Christians are in fact being actively persecuted for their faith?

Obama is a rank hypocrit and a Muslim advocate, to the detriment of the American public's safety and economic well being.

 

[theHawk]

Funny how liberals never howled about Jimmy Carter's ban on Iranians from entering the US during his Presidency.

 

[TNHarley]

Doesn't matter. Our COTUS gives full immigration power to Congress. NOTHING in the COTUS says they cant let certain groups of people in. People say it does, but wont tell me where...

 

[JimBowie1958]

Doesn't matter. Our COTUS gives full immigration power to Congress. NOTHING in the COTUS says they cant let certain groups of people in. People say it does, but wont tell me where...

The president has always had a wide range of discretion to enforce the laws as he sees best, as long as h e does enforce the laws as written by Congress. That is a huge amount of discretion made even larger by our current Dictator in Chief.

Carter Banned Iranians from Coming to US During Hostage Crisis

Here's Jimmy "Hitler" Carter saying it back in 1980.

Fourth, the Secretary of Treasury [State] and the Attorney General will invalidate all visas issued to Iranian citizens for future entry into the United States, effective today. We will not reissue visas, nor will we issue new visas, except for compelling and proven humanitarian reasons or where the national interest of our own country requires. This directive will be interpreted very strictly.

Apparently barring people from a terrorist country is not against "our values" after all. It may even be "who we are". Either that or Carter was a racist monster just like Trump.

Meanwhile here's how the Iranian students in the US were treated.

Carter orders 50,000 Iranian students in US to report to immigration office with view to deporting those in violation of their visas. On 27 December 1979, US appeals court allows deportation of Iranian students found in violation.

In November 1979, the Attorney General had given all Iranian students one month to report to the local immigration office. Around 7,000 were found in violation of their visas. Around 15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the US.