EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 78,145
- 54,181
- 2,645
Democrats will deny any of this is happening. It's the Trump recession.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PRESIDENT Obama created 8.9 million jobs by the end of December 2016, a 6.2 percent increase. There were 152.3 million people employed at the end of his term. That's compared to 143.4 million working at the end of the Bush administration.Beats the hell out of that asshole Obama's eight year record of increased poverty, decreased family income and dismal economic growth.
These Moon Bats were idiots electing Obama.
Economy is booming. Unemployment at levels that haven’t been seen in decades
Usually means automatic reelection for a sitting President
Then there is Trump......
Of course Trump gets the credit. He's POTUS.
If the numbers were bad he'd get the blame. He's POTUS.
Barry left Trump a fair hand but Trump has improved on it greatly. Both get credit for this economy and both deserve to.
Economy is booming. Unemployment at levels that haven’t been seen in decades
Usually means automatic reelection for a sitting President
Then there is Trump......
Usually a booming economy means the national debt not skyrocketing and the president not begging for another round of QE...
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Well its not skyrocketing in the sense that the GDP to debt ratio lately has been more stable.
Economy is booming. Unemployment at levels that haven’t been seen in decades
Usually means automatic reelection for a sitting President
Then there is Trump......
Of course Trump gets the credit. He's POTUS.
If the numbers were bad he'd get the blame. He's POTUS.
Barry left Trump a fair hand but Trump has improved on it greatly. Both get credit for this economy and both deserve to.
The question is, will the voters give Trump a second term just because of the economy
Any President with an economy like this should see approval numbers in the 60s. Trump struggles to remain in the 40s
Trump is his own worse enemy
Economy is booming. Unemployment at levels that haven’t been seen in decades
Usually means automatic reelection for a sitting President
Then there is Trump......
Of course Trump gets the credit. He's POTUS.
If the numbers were bad he'd get the blame. He's POTUS.
Barry left Trump a fair hand but Trump has improved on it greatly. Both get credit for this economy and both deserve to.
The question is, will the voters give Trump a second term just because of the economy
Any President with an economy like this should see approval numbers in the 60s. Trump struggles to remain in the 40s
Trump is his own worse enemy
But just because economic numbers are "mixed" does not mean that YOU can draw a CONCLUSION that completely contradicts the actual numbers YOUR assumption is based on. FACTS have nothing to do with partisanship, you made a false assumption that is contradicted by real unmixed numbers, but you are too partisan to admit you could ever be wrong. Anyone who exposes your false "logic" can only be partisan to you!Typically WRONG!Very nice. With unemployment this low, this probably means that people are still re-entering.
The number not in labor force INCREASED from 95,714,000 to 96,596,000 or 882,000.
the labor force DECREASED from 162,823,000 to 162,097,000 or 726,000.
Please see post 54.
Or don't.Economic numbers are virtually always mixed.
Good news is good news, at least for those of us who aren't paralyzed by partisan ideology.
.
Well let us look at how Tramp reviewed the economy that matched his current economy of 96,596,000 workers not in the labor force.How is President Trump responsible for the Fake News Attacks he's had to endure over the past 4 years? If you watched strictly the Lame Stream media, you would have no idea how much the economy is booming
Let’s be honestEconomy is booming. Unemployment at levels that haven’t been seen in decades
Usually means automatic reelection for a sitting President
Then there is Trump......
Of course Trump gets the credit. He's POTUS.
If the numbers were bad he'd get the blame. He's POTUS.
Barry left Trump a fair hand but Trump has improved on it greatly. Both get credit for this economy and both deserve to.
The question is, will the voters give Trump a second term just because of the economy
Any President with an economy like this should see approval numbers in the 60s. Trump struggles to remain in the 40s
Trump is his own worse enemy
How is President Trump responsible for the Fake News Attacks he's had to endure over the past 4 years? If you watched strictly the Lame Stream media, you would have no idea how much the economy is booming, all they covered over the past 2 was the Mueller Witch Hunt where every day they announced "the walls are closing in on our President, this is the beginning of the end"
now we wait for "Wandering Fingers" to boast how this all started when he and "Zero" were in office.Democrats will deny any of this is happening. It's the Trump recession.
This is the summer of recovery !!!Economy is booming. Unemployment at levels that haven’t been seen in decades
Usually means automatic reelection for a sitting President
Then there is Trump......
Of course Trump gets the credit. He's POTUS.
If the numbers were bad he'd get the blame. He's POTUS.
Barry left Trump a fair hand but Trump has improved on it greatly. Both get credit for this economy and both deserve to.
The question is, will the voters give Trump a second term just because of the economy
Any President with an economy like this should see approval numbers in the 60s. Trump struggles to remain in the 40s
Trump is his own worse enemy
He stands a damned good chance because of this great economy.
Hell they gave Barry a second term with the economy in the toilet and UE through the roof.
Trump will win in 2020.
Buckle up buttercup you are in for one bumpy ass ride and I'll be LMAO.
What's causing wages to increase?Nice to see an April rebound. And wages increasing.. I hope we can continue this positive trend.
Please note that I said "probably". You can disagree with that all you want.But just because economic numbers are "mixed" does not mean that YOU can draw a CONCLUSION that completely contradicts the actual numbers YOUR assumption is based on. FACTS have nothing to do with partisanship, you made a false assumption that is contradicted by real unmixed numbers, but you are too partisan to admit you could ever be wrong. Anyone who exposes your false "logic" can only be partisan to you!Typically WRONG!Very nice. With unemployment this low, this probably means that people are still re-entering.
The number not in labor force INCREASED from 95,714,000 to 96,596,000 or 882,000.
the labor force DECREASED from 162,823,000 to 162,097,000 or 726,000.
Please see post 54.
Or don't.Economic numbers are virtually always mixed.
Good news is good news, at least for those of us who aren't paralyzed by partisan ideology.
.
These numbers are better than expected. Good for all who were able to find gainful employment and receive a wage increase.
There is no doubt that the credit for this great jobs report goes to President Trump and his growth oriented economic policies.
Onward.
Except there is NO "probably" about it. People were NOT "reentering" as you FALSELY claimed, they were LEAVING in great numbers, and that and only that brought the UE rate down. I even posted the exact numbers and did the subtraction for you and yet you STILL see a "probability" you were right.Please note that I said "probably". You can disagree with that all you want.But just because economic numbers are "mixed" does not mean that YOU can draw a CONCLUSION that completely contradicts the actual numbers YOUR assumption is based on. FACTS have nothing to do with partisanship, you made a false assumption that is contradicted by real unmixed numbers, but you are too partisan to admit you could ever be wrong. Anyone who exposes your false "logic" can only be partisan to you!Typically WRONG!Very nice. With unemployment this low, this probably means that people are still re-entering.
The number not in labor force INCREASED from 95,714,000 to 96,596,000 or 882,000.
the labor force DECREASED from 162,823,000 to 162,097,000 or 726,000.
Please see post 54.
Or don't.Economic numbers are virtually always mixed.
Good news is good news, at least for those of us who aren't paralyzed by partisan ideology.
.
If the President had a (D) after his name, you'd be all thrilled 'n stuff.
You're a partisan zombie. Embrace it. Learn it. Live it. Love it.
Then, get me out of your head.
.
Oh, cheer up.Except there is NO "probably" about it. People were NOT "reentering" as you FALSELY claimed, they were LEAVING in great numbers, and that and only that brought the UE rate down. I even posted the exact numbers and did the subtraction for you and yet you STILL see a "probability" you were right.Please note that I said "probably". You can disagree with that all you want.But just because economic numbers are "mixed" does not mean that YOU can draw a CONCLUSION that completely contradicts the actual numbers YOUR assumption is based on. FACTS have nothing to do with partisanship, you made a false assumption that is contradicted by real unmixed numbers, but you are too partisan to admit you could ever be wrong. Anyone who exposes your false "logic" can only be partisan to you!Typically WRONG!Very nice. With unemployment this low, this probably means that people are still re-entering.
The number not in labor force INCREASED from 95,714,000 to 96,596,000 or 882,000.
the labor force DECREASED from 162,823,000 to 162,097,000 or 726,000.
Please see post 54.
Or don't.Economic numbers are virtually always mixed.
Good news is good news, at least for those of us who aren't paralyzed by partisan ideology.
.
If the President had a (D) after his name, you'd be all thrilled 'n stuff.
You're a partisan zombie. Embrace it. Learn it. Live it. Love it.
Then, get me out of your head.
.
You have to remember how Tramp interpreted the exact same numbers under Obama, so my holding Tramp to HIS own standard does NOT make me a partisan, it simply means I have a much better memory than a partisan hack like you.
A longtime skeptic of the official jobs figures, Trump claimed the "real number" is 96 million people without jobs, which would correspond to an unemployment rate of 37.8 percent
You're a partisan hack. Embrace it. Learn it. Live it. Love it.
Except there is NO "probably" about it. People were NOT "reentering" as you FALSELY claimed, they were LEAVING in great numbers, and that and only that brought the UE rate down. I even posted the exact numbers and did the subtraction for you and yet you STILL see a "probability" you were right.
You have to remember how Tramp interpreted the exact same numbers under Obama, so my holding Tramp to HIS own standard does NOT make me a partisan, it simply means I have a much better memory than a partisan hack like you.
A longtime skeptic of the official jobs figures, Trump claimed the "real number" is 96 million people without jobs, which would correspond to an unemployment rate of 37.8 percent
You're a partisan hack. Embrace it. Learn it. Live it. Love it.
Still the partisan hack, attacking me with your OWN fabrications simply because I pointed out YOUR flawed "logic" which was completely contradicted by the facts.Oh, cheer up.Except there is NO "probably" about it. People were NOT "reentering" as you FALSELY claimed, they were LEAVING in great numbers, and that and only that brought the UE rate down. I even posted the exact numbers and did the subtraction for you and yet you STILL see a "probability" you were right.Please note that I said "probably". You can disagree with that all you want.But just because economic numbers are "mixed" does not mean that YOU can draw a CONCLUSION that completely contradicts the actual numbers YOUR assumption is based on. FACTS have nothing to do with partisanship, you made a false assumption that is contradicted by real unmixed numbers, but you are too partisan to admit you could ever be wrong. Anyone who exposes your false "logic" can only be partisan to you!Typically WRONG!
The number not in labor force INCREASED from 95,714,000 to 96,596,000 or 882,000.
the labor force DECREASED from 162,823,000 to 162,097,000 or 726,000.
Please see post 54.
Or don't.Economic numbers are virtually always mixed.
Good news is good news, at least for those of us who aren't paralyzed by partisan ideology.
.
If the President had a (D) after his name, you'd be all thrilled 'n stuff.
You're a partisan zombie. Embrace it. Learn it. Live it. Love it.
Then, get me out of your head.
.
You have to remember how Tramp interpreted the exact same numbers under Obama, so my holding Tramp to HIS own standard does NOT make me a partisan, it simply means I have a much better memory than a partisan hack like you.
A longtime skeptic of the official jobs figures, Trump claimed the "real number" is 96 million people without jobs, which would correspond to an unemployment rate of 37.8 percent
You're a partisan hack. Embrace it. Learn it. Live it. Love it.
Maybe we'll lose a ton of jobs next month, more people will be suffering, and Trump's 2020 chances will decline.
Never give up hope.
.
Still the partisan hack, attacking me with your OWN fabrications simply because I pointed out YOUR flawed "logic" which was completely contradicted by the facts.Oh, cheer up.Except there is NO "probably" about it. People were NOT "reentering" as you FALSELY claimed, they were LEAVING in great numbers, and that and only that brought the UE rate down. I even posted the exact numbers and did the subtraction for you and yet you STILL see a "probability" you were right.Please note that I said "probably". You can disagree with that all you want.But just because economic numbers are "mixed" does not mean that YOU can draw a CONCLUSION that completely contradicts the actual numbers YOUR assumption is based on. FACTS have nothing to do with partisanship, you made a false assumption that is contradicted by real unmixed numbers, but you are too partisan to admit you could ever be wrong. Anyone who exposes your false "logic" can only be partisan to you!
Please see post 54.
Or don't.
.
If the President had a (D) after his name, you'd be all thrilled 'n stuff.
You're a partisan zombie. Embrace it. Learn it. Live it. Love it.
Then, get me out of your head.
.
You have to remember how Tramp interpreted the exact same numbers under Obama, so my holding Tramp to HIS own standard does NOT make me a partisan, it simply means I have a much better memory than a partisan hack like you.
A longtime skeptic of the official jobs figures, Trump claimed the "real number" is 96 million people without jobs, which would correspond to an unemployment rate of 37.8 percent
You're a partisan hack. Embrace it. Learn it. Live it. Love it.
Maybe we'll lose a ton of jobs next month, more people will be suffering, and Trump's 2020 chances will decline.
Never give up hope.
.