In what century will the Palestinians hold their next election.BTW, Rashida Tlaib won her reelection with 66% of the vote.
Maybe she should move to Palestine and run for office?
Any day now. A week after they defeat the Jews.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In what century will the Palestinians hold their next election.BTW, Rashida Tlaib won her reelection with 66% of the vote.
Maybe she should move to Palestine and run for office?
Mindful brought up Rashida Tlaib. I was merely responding to her post.What does this have to do with the thread?BTW, Rashida Tlaib won her reelection with 66% of the vote.Leftists Denounce Peace Deal Between Israel and the UAE
By
David Lange
-
August 13, 2020
250
I am sure you’ve already heard the news: Israel and the United Arab Emirates reached a historic agreement today to set up full diplomatic relations between the two countries.
You’d think those on the Left would welcome a peace treaty, right?
Just kidding – I am sure you all know better than that.
They hate it.
Here are some of the reactions:
Rashida Tlaib.
Rashida Tlaib
@RashidaTlaib
We won’t be fooled by another Trump/Netanyahu deal. We won't celebrate Netanyahu for not stealing land he already controls in exchange for a sweetheart business deal. The heart of the issue has never been planned, formal annexation, but ongoing, devastating apartheid.
Read more:
History Series
Of course those crazy Zionists and rightwingnuts don't like her.
There's an actual topic, it's not Tlaib's election campaign.
Neither about your hasty generalizations of
Right-wing Zionists and Left-wing Zionists.
If you don't have anything on topic - get lost.
I dont particularly get Qatar's stance about some Middle East issues. Especially their relations with Iran which led to harsh measures from Saudi Arabia.Those folks go on Egyptian TV demanding "a million martyr march to Jerusalem",
while having Iranian and Qatari flags on the billboards.
And even Qatar is giving signs of "had
After news came out about the Israel-UAE peace deal, my immediate thought was “I have to speak to my UAE-based friend Thani to get his take.”
So I did.
WATCH: A Jew and a Muslim Discuss the Israel-UAE Peace Deal
After news came out about the Israel-UAE peace deal, my immediate thought was "I have to speak to my UAE-based friend Thani to get his take." So I did.www.israellycool.com
Given Joe Biden’s role in the Obama administration’s decision to sign a nuclear deal with Iran, it should not be surprising that he would advocate reversing President Donald Trump’s decision to repudiate the agreement. Doing so, however, would compound the mistake Obama made — and worse, reward Iran’s misbehavior.
Let’s review some of the reasons the original agreement was a failure:
Biden has said he will negotiate a better deal, but that is what critics urged from the outset and were told could not be done. Instead, Obama signed a terrible deal because of his poor negotiating skills, naivete, weak bargaining position created by his unwillingness to use military force, and desperation to have a foreign policy accomplishment for his legacy.
- Iranian hostility toward the United States never abated.
- Iran prevented “anywhere, anytime” inspections, making verification impossible.
- Iran failed to disclose information about its prior nuclear activities.
- Iran continued to pursue a bomb.
Iranians have been out-bargaining people for centuries, so Obama had no chance of coming out ahead. Iran was willing to accept the short term pain of allowing inspections at non-military facilities (that is, the ones where they were most likely to engage in nuclear R&D) and limitations on enrichment (while being allowed to keep centrifuges now used to increase uranium purity) in exchange for the end of sanctions and a $150 billion payoff. Meanwhile, they could continue their covert nuclear operations and continue to threaten their neighbors, sponsor terror, and develop ballistic missiles. Obama’s naive belief that Iran would cease hostility toward the United States was as fantastical as his idea that Palestinians would agree to peace if he put the screws to Israel.
Comparing Biden and Trump on Iran - Algemeiner.com
Given Joe Biden’s role in the Obama administration’s decision to sign a nuclear deal with Iran, it should not be surprising that he would advocate reversing President Donald Trump’s decision to repudiate the agreement. Doing so, however, would compound the mistake Obama made -- and worse, reward...www.algemeiner.com
Given Joe Biden’s role in the Obama administration’s decision to sign a nuclear deal with Iran, it should not be surprising that he would advocate reversing President Donald Trump’s decision to repudiate the agreement. Doing so, however, would compound the mistake Obama made — and worse, reward Iran’s misbehavior.
Let’s review some of the reasons the original agreement was a failure:
Biden has said he will negotiate a better deal, but that is what critics urged from the outset and were told could not be done. Instead, Obama signed a terrible deal because of his poor negotiating skills, naivete, weak bargaining position created by his unwillingness to use military force, and desperation to have a foreign policy accomplishment for his legacy.
- Iranian hostility toward the United States never abated.
- Iran prevented “anywhere, anytime” inspections, making verification impossible.
- Iran failed to disclose information about its prior nuclear activities.
- Iran continued to pursue a bomb.
Iranians have been out-bargaining people for centuries, so Obama had no chance of coming out ahead. Iran was willing to accept the short term pain of allowing inspections at non-military facilities (that is, the ones where they were most likely to engage in nuclear R&D) and limitations on enrichment (while being allowed to keep centrifuges now used to increase uranium purity) in exchange for the end of sanctions and a $150 billion payoff. Meanwhile, they could continue their covert nuclear operations and continue to threaten their neighbors, sponsor terror, and develop ballistic missiles. Obama’s naive belief that Iran would cease hostility toward the United States was as fantastical as his idea that Palestinians would agree to peace if he put the screws to Israel.
Comparing Biden and Trump on Iran - Algemeiner.com
Given Joe Biden’s role in the Obama administration’s decision to sign a nuclear deal with Iran, it should not be surprising that he would advocate reversing President Donald Trump’s decision to repudiate the agreement. Doing so, however, would compound the mistake Obama made -- and worse, reward...www.algemeiner.com
I'm more interested in Biden's view on Turkey,
another side of the deal kept out of discourse.
It would be a much greater 'Deal of the Century' if Kurds were included.
Again not naive with the expectation, but I think there's an opportunity we're missing.
If position towards Israel can shift, towards Kurds should as well.
I hope at least this apparent silence serves constructive means long term.
Given Joe Biden’s role in the Obama administration’s decision to sign a nuclear deal with Iran, it should not be surprising that he would advocate reversing President Donald Trump’s decision to repudiate the agreement. Doing so, however, would compound the mistake Obama made — and worse, reward Iran’s misbehavior.
Let’s review some of the reasons the original agreement was a failure:
Biden has said he will negotiate a better deal, but that is what critics urged from the outset and were told could not be done. Instead, Obama signed a terrible deal because of his poor negotiating skills, naivete, weak bargaining position created by his unwillingness to use military force, and desperation to have a foreign policy accomplishment for his legacy.
- Iranian hostility toward the United States never abated.
- Iran prevented “anywhere, anytime” inspections, making verification impossible.
- Iran failed to disclose information about its prior nuclear activities.
- Iran continued to pursue a bomb.
Iranians have been out-bargaining people for centuries, so Obama had no chance of coming out ahead. Iran was willing to accept the short term pain of allowing inspections at non-military facilities (that is, the ones where they were most likely to engage in nuclear R&D) and limitations on enrichment (while being allowed to keep centrifuges now used to increase uranium purity) in exchange for the end of sanctions and a $150 billion payoff. Meanwhile, they could continue their covert nuclear operations and continue to threaten their neighbors, sponsor terror, and develop ballistic missiles. Obama’s naive belief that Iran would cease hostility toward the United States was as fantastical as his idea that Palestinians would agree to peace if he put the screws to Israel.
Comparing Biden and Trump on Iran - Algemeiner.com
Given Joe Biden’s role in the Obama administration’s decision to sign a nuclear deal with Iran, it should not be surprising that he would advocate reversing President Donald Trump’s decision to repudiate the agreement. Doing so, however, would compound the mistake Obama made -- and worse, reward...www.algemeiner.com
I'm more interested in Biden's view on Turkey,
another side of the deal kept out of discourse.
It would be a much greater 'Deal of the Century' if Kurds were included.
Again not naive with the expectation, but I think there's an opportunity we're missing.
If position towards Israel can shift, towards Kurds should as well.
I hope at least this apparent silence serves constructive means long term.
I dread the thought of Biden reversing the Iran issue.
- "It is stupid to burn my country's flag and want me to salute you." — Dr. Waseem Yousef, Emirati academic, on Twitter.
- "When I see the flag of my country being burned by some Palestinians because of the peace treaty with Israel – I apologize to every Israeli man if I offended him in the past." — Dr. Waseem Yousef.
- "Imagine that in just 17 years, Saudi Arabia paid [the Palestinians] $6 billion and the UAE $2.5 billion. This means that in 40 years, we are talking about no less than $20 billion. I expect that had we spent this money on Israel, its people would have converted to Islam." — From a UAE-affiliated account on Twitter.
- The Palestinian leaders' strong condemnation of the UAE and other Arab states that support normalization with Israel has also driven many Arabs to raise the issue of financial corruption of the Palestinian leadership. Some Gulf citizens pointed out that the personal fortunes of Hamas leaders Ismail Haniyeh and Khaled Mashaal are worth at least $9 billion, while others claimed that Mahmoud Abbas's personal wealth is estimated at $200 million