Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
you couldnt educate a duck to learn how to swim,,I'm trying to educate you.
The law that is relevant here is 18 USC 793. It says it's illegal to disclose national defense information.
The law doesn't say "classified" information because that didn't really exist when the espionage act was written in 1917.
But, when someone gets in trouble for mishandling classified information, they're actually charged for mishandling national defense information. That's because national defense information and classified information are generally speaking the same thing.
You posted one excerpt from the Hur report, but ignored the larger context. Now you are running away from that fact.
18 US 798 makes it illegal to willfully disclose classified material to an unauthorized personI'm trying to educate you.
The law that is relevant here is 18 USC 793. It says it's illegal to disclose national defense information.
The law doesn't say "classified" information because that didn't really exist when the espionage act was written in 1917.
But, when someone gets in trouble for mishandling classified information, they're actually charged for mishandling national defense information. That's because national defense information and classified information are generally speaking the same thing.
You posted one excerpt from the Hur report, but ignored the larger context. Now you are running away from that fact.
Not exactly. It said there was evidence did so, but not enough to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.you couldnt educate a duck to learn how to swim,,
the hur report started off by saying biden willfully retained and showed classified documents to other people,,
now thats a crime,,
Only if it is related to these topics:18 US 798 makes it illegal to willfully disclose classified material to an unauthorized person
Try educating yourself first
Yes, now you are educating yourselfOnly if it is related to these topics:
(1)
concerning the nature, preparation, or use of any code, cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any foreign government; or
(2)
concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or repair of any device, apparatus, or appliance used or prepared or planned for use by the United States or any foreign government for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes; or
(3)
concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government; or
(4)
obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processes—
You still ignored the conclusion of the Hur report. You only posted one part of it out of context. The conclusion is that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt he did so willingly and knowingly
How do you know the information was classified?
Which other president lied about having them? Which other president ignored a subpoena for them? Which other president moved them to keep the FBI from finding them?/----/ As every other president has done.
Defense attorney Todd Blanche, adding that the PRA was passed in the late '70s and nothing in the statute says anything about documents with markings or anything that gives the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) the ability to challenge a president's decision about which documents are personal versus presidential.
Team Trump also points out often that then-President Trump caused these boxes to be moved while he was still president and that this is the first time NARA has challenged a decision made by a president about which documents are personal versus presidential. They claim NARA only took this action because the president in question was Donald Trump.
Trump Florida Judge Cannon denies Trump dismissal on 'unconstitutional vagueness'
Thursday's federal hearing against former President Trump looks unfavorable for his legal team, with District Court Judge Aileen Cannon denying a motion to dismiss on "unconstitutional vagueness."www.foxnews.com
Besides xiden? To be fair xiden did his lying as president, the moving and hiding was when he was Senator, VP or private citizen…the selling? Well the only time we know that was when he was a private citizenWhich other president lied about having them? Which other president ignored a subpoena for them? Which other president moved them to keep the FBI from finding them?
it was a statement of fact by bidens own words,,,Not exactly. It said there was evidence did so, but not enough to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
If you can't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, it's not a crime.
Is that what your handlers are telling you?where do you think he confessed?
and your article is also wrong, there weren't a "handful of classified documents" in Xiden's garage....the DOJ found tons of them, all over the place, in his home, garage, office in DC, and were all taken willfully, and disclosed willfully.
who is he to determine reasonable doubt, it's not a court of law. It's an investigation. Not a trial with a judge and jury. You're incorrect on what authority he could make such a statement except to show his bias to demofk cucks.Not exactly. It said there was evidence did so, but not enough to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
If you can't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, it's not a crime.
he had them. He never waivered from that position.That's a straight up lie.
Well the DOJ actually wrote a report about it, and the special prosecutor testified about itIs that what your handlers are telling you?
LOL
No its not.That's a lie.
/----/ "Which other president lied about having them?"Which other president lied about having them? Which other president ignored a subpoena for them? Which other president moved them to keep the FBI from finding them?
dailytorch.com
