Trump at CPAC: No world government

[Bleipriester]

Trump spoke out against a world government. There is no such thing as world government, world currency, world anthem, he stressed. "I do not represent the globe, I represent your country", he assured the USA, USA chanting listeners.

Trump also addressed unfavorable trade agreements, open borders, free defense, terrorism and more.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/24/...ative-political-action-conference-speech.html
Trump gegen westliche Asylpolitik und Weltregierung - "Es wird keine globale Hymne, globale Währung, globale Flagge geben"

 

[JohnnyApplesack]

Trump spoke out against a world government. There is no such thing as world government, world currency, world anthem, he stressed. "I do not represent the globe, I represent your country", he assured the USA, USA chanting listeners.

Trump also addressed unfavorable trade agreements, open borders, free defense, terrorism and more.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/24/...ative-political-action-conference-speech.html

Trump gegen westliche Asylpolitik und Weltregierung - "Es wird keine globale Hymne, globale Währung, globale Flagge geben"

sounds like Bannon is still cranking out hose bitchin speeches

 

[Fenton Lum]

Trump, the president of the US, THE global military hegemonic power is "against" a world govt? Pfffffffffffffffft, bullshit.

For over fifty years the American military establishment has been a source of support for multinational capital, and for alliances whose logic is to preserve an open trade and investment system throughout the world. The U.S. military presence still protects economic interests, notably in Saudi Arabia and other oil satrapies, and it may now allow the United States to control Iraq’s oil fields, but the extent and duration of that control, and whether it will increase the leverage of the United States over supplies and prices in the world’s oil markets, remain highly problematic. Pax Americana has always been a mixed blessing for U.S. allies: it has been maintained partly by military power, undercutting efforts by U.S. allies in Europe and Japan to forge independent foreign policies. With the demise of the Soviet Union, the United States became “the only superpower still standing” and quickly set about using the new configuration of power in the world to reassert and expand its dominion over all comers.
U.S. Hegemony: Continuing Decline, Enduring Danger by Richard B. Du Boff | Monthly Review

The american taxpayers will continue to fund america's global hegemony even as it cannibalizes their own society.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Trump, the president of the US, THE global military hegemonic power is "against" a world govt? Pfffffffffffffffft, bullshit.

For over fifty years the American military establishment has been a source of support for multinational capital, and for alliances whose logic is to preserve an open trade and investment system throughout the world. The U.S. military presence still protects economic interests, notably in Saudi Arabia and other oil satrapies, and it may now allow the United States to control Iraq’s oil fields, but the extent and duration of that control, and whether it will increase the leverage of the United States over supplies and prices in the world’s oil markets, remain highly problematic. Pax Americana has always been a mixed blessing for U.S. allies: it has been maintained partly by military power, undercutting efforts by U.S. allies in Europe and Japan to forge independent foreign policies. With the demise of the Soviet Union, the United States became “the only superpower still standing” and quickly set about using the new configuration of power in the world to reassert and expand its dominion over all comers.
U.S. Hegemony: Continuing Decline, Enduring Danger by Richard B. Du Boff | Monthly Review

The american taxpayers will continue to fund america's global hegemony even as it cannibalizes their own society.

Nobody is stopping those other countries from resisting. If they were a better alternative they'd have done something about it by now.