Florida is run by Republicans.I know, right? Democrats dragging their feet. That NEVER happens.Since the recount went over the deadline, we'll never know, will we?
A recount in Florida that didn't get finished in time? Say it ain't so!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Florida is run by Republicans.I know, right? Democrats dragging their feet. That NEVER happens.Since the recount went over the deadline, we'll never know, will we?
A recount in Florida that didn't get finished in time? Say it ain't so!
So you won't admit that it's a fair election?Pussy out? Of what? Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?I knew you would pussy out. It's what you do.Since the recount went over the deadline, we'll never know, will we?
Oh, wait, I forgot -- your definition of "fair election" is "an election where the Democrat wins".
NOTE: Leftist wishful thinking is NOT conclusive evidence. I know that comes as a shock to you.
I await for Dave to be consistent and declare that every other sort-of close election also needs a total recount in order to be called "fair". Oh wait. That would require Dave to be consistent. So it's not going to happen. He'll only be cherrypicking this single election as "possibly not a fair win".
Now, a liberal will simply look at the recount law, see if it applies, and if it does, support the recount, no matter who is ahead. It's that consistency thing, the thing which defines liberals. Alas, to those on the kook fringe right, any win by a Democrat is illegitimate by definition, so any tactic is justifiable to overturn the win, such as asking for special exemptions from recount laws that no other candidate gets. And if they can't overturn the election, they'll pout and question legitimacy of it.
So you won't admit that it's a fair election?Pussy out? Of what? Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?I knew you would pussy out. It's what you do.
NOTE: Leftist wishful thinking is NOT conclusive evidence. I know that comes as a shock to you.
Has any evidence of fraud been proven?
Then you quoted the wrong post.I await for Dave to be consistent and declare that every other sort-of close election also needs a total recount in order to be called "fair". Oh wait. That would require Dave to be consistent. So it's not going to happen. He'll only be cherrypicking this single election as "possibly not a fair win".
Now, a liberal will simply look at the recount law, see if it applies, and if it does, support the recount, no matter who is ahead. It's that consistency thing, the thing which defines liberals. Alas, to those on the kook fringe right, any win by a Democrat is illegitimate by definition, so any tactic is justifiable to overturn the win, such as asking for special exemptions from recount laws that no other candidate gets. And if they can't overturn the election, they'll pout and question legitimacy of it.
Quoted for truth!
I await for Dave to be consistent and declare that every other sort-of close election also needs a total recount in order to be called "fair". Oh wait. That would require Dave to be consistent. So it's not going to happen. He'll only be cherrypicking this single election as "possibly not a fair win".
Now, a liberal will simply look at the recount law, see if it applies, and if it does, support the recount, no matter who is ahead. It's that consistency thing, the thing which defines liberals. Alas, to those on the kook fringe right, any win by a Democrat is illegitimate by definition, so any tactic is justifiable to overturn the win, such as asking for special exemptions from recount laws that no other candidate gets. And if they can't overturn the election, they'll pout and question legitimacy of it.
What's your definition of "conclusively proven accurate"?So you won't admit that it's a fair election?Pussy out? Of what? Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?
NOTE: Leftist wishful thinking is NOT conclusive evidence. I know that comes as a shock to you.
Has any evidence of fraud been proven?
"Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?"
Maybe if you threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue. That tactic's popular with those of your mental age.
Completing the recount that wasn't completed would be a good start.What's your definition of "conclusively proven accurate"?So you won't admit that it's a fair election?
Has any evidence of fraud been proven?
"Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?"
Maybe if you threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue. That tactic's popular with those of your mental age.
You'll never believe a Democrat, so you will continue to question it's validity.
Why would they do a recount? It's not within the margin to trigger a recount.Completing the recount that wasn't completed would be a good start.What's your definition of "conclusively proven accurate"?"Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?"
Maybe if you threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue. That tactic's popular with those of your mental age.
You'll never believe a Democrat, so you will continue to question it's validity.
But, we know your loathing for democracy. What the people want doesn't matter, as long as the Democrat wins.
Right?
Why would they do a recount? It's not within the margin to trigger a recount.Completing the recount that wasn't completed would be a good start.What's your definition of "conclusively proven accurate"?
You'll never believe a Democrat, so you will continue to question it's validity.
But, we know your loathing for democracy. What the people want doesn't matter, as long as the Democrat wins.
Right?
Your butthurt is never-ending, it seems.
daveman insists on a recount, even though they aren't in the margin to trigger a recount.Why would they do a recount? It's not within the margin to trigger a recount.Completing the recount that wasn't completed would be a good start.
But, we know your loathing for democracy. What the people want doesn't matter, as long as the Democrat wins.
Right?
Your butthurt is never-ending, it seems.
he HAS to. He started this FAILthread
that about sums it updaveman insists on a recount, even though they aren't in the margin to trigger a recount.Why would they do a recount? It's not within the margin to trigger a recount.
Your butthurt is never-ending, it seems.
he HAS to. He started this FAILthread
Then, since they didn't do a recount, daveman insists that they are cheating.
Then, once they start recounting and Murphy racks up an even larger lead, West concedes, but daveman still bitterly clings to Democrats cheating because they didn't do a recount.
Fucking hilarious!
Allen West
Worst Congressman in history.....one and done
Couldn't hack it in the Army, couldn't hack it in Congress
22 years in uniform =/= "couldn't hack it".
Moron.
Why would they do a recount? It's not within the margin to trigger a recount.Completing the recount that wasn't completed would be a good start.What's your definition of "conclusively proven accurate"?
You'll never believe a Democrat, so you will continue to question it's validity.
But, we know your loathing for democracy. What the people want doesn't matter, as long as the Democrat wins.
Right?
Your butthurt is never-ending, it seems.
Allen West
Worst Congressman in history.....one and done
Couldn't hack it in the Army, couldn't hack it in Congress
22 years in uniform =/= "couldn't hack it".
Moron.
Yeah, he wound up paying a $5,000 fine for his crimes, and forced into retirement. Moron.
Once again you prove you don't read what I write, but instead listen to the unreliable voices in your head.daveman insists on a recount, even though they aren't in the margin to trigger a recount.Why would they do a recount? It's not within the margin to trigger a recount.
Your butthurt is never-ending, it seems.
he HAS to. He started this FAILthread
Then, since they didn't do a recount, daveman insists that they are cheating.
Then, once they start recounting and Murphy racks up an even larger lead, West concedes, but daveman still bitterly clings to Democrats cheating because they didn't do a recount.
Fucking hilarious!
Completely honorable. No court-martial.Allen West
Worst Congressman in history.....one and done
Couldn't hack it in the Army, couldn't hack it in Congress
22 years in uniform =/= "couldn't hack it".
Moron.
Yeah, he wound up paying a $5,000 fine for his crimes, and forced into retirement. Moron.