Traitor’s Principle

[Flanders]

There are famous principles for almost everything. Philosophical principles, ethical principles, moral principles, and so on have been with us for centuries. Now the Traitor’s Principle can be added to the list. This guy is the face of the Traitor’s Principle in that nest of the traitors known as the U.S. Senate:

Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont​

http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/03/PatrickLeahy.png

Sen. Patrick Leahy is ironically one step closer to using a nuclear safety bill to make it easier for nuclear weapons-seeking terrorists to enter the country.​

NOTE: Leahy has a history of helping America’s enemies.

IRAN-CONTRA HEARINGS; SENATOR LEAHY SAYS HE LEAKED REPORT OF PANEL
By STEPHEN ENGELBERG, Special to the New York Times
Published: July 29, 1987

IRAN-CONTRA HEARINGS; SENATOR LEAHY SAYS HE LEAKED REPORT OF PANEL​

Briefly, betraying the country is the Traitor’s Principle, but exactly what is the foundation principle traitors are citing to justify the United Nations dictating this country’s immigration policy? I am fairly certain those principles did not include open-borders, or welcoming violent enemies. I am absolutely certain that Leahy and his fellow Democrats will claim The New Colossus is a foundation principle:

The Senate Judiciary Committee succeeded Thursday in passing a resolution saying, “The United States must not bar individuals from entering into the United States based on their religion, as such action would be contrary to the fundamental principles on which this Nation was founded.”​

So how about this. Every United Nations Muslim that comes here can only live in Vermont. Should they leave Vermont they either get deported immediately, or they do a nickel in a state prison at the expense of Vermont taxpayers. After all, they are responsible for Leahy. They are also responsible for any killing United Nations refugees do in every state.

Sadly, loyal Americans never seem able to prevent traitors from carrying the day.

Critics of Leahy’s amendment said the wording was “unprecedented,” given that law enforcement personnel must look into all aspects of an immigrant’s beliefs when conducting background checks, the Washington Free Beacon reported Thursday.

Committee member Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama criticized those who voted in favor of the resolution and offered his own.

“It is the sense of the Senate that the individual right of the American people to keep and bear arms, as recognized by the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States [...] is among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty and deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition, such that any violation of this precious right would be contrary to the fundamental principles upon which this Nation was founded,” the amendment reads.

Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, David Vitter of Louisiana, and Ted Cruz of Texas were the only other members who joined Sessions in rejecting Leahy’s resolution.

“The adoption of Leahy Amendment would constitute a transformation of our immigration system,” Sessions said in his opposing statement. “In effect, it is a move toward the ratification of the idea that global migration is a ‘human right,’ and a civil right, and that these so-called ‘immigrants’ rights’ must be supreme to the rights of sovereign nations to determine who can and cannot enter their borders.”

Senate rushes to thwart Trump-inspired Muslim bans
Posted By Douglas Ernst On 12/10/2015 @ 4:59 pm

Senate rushes to thwart Trump-inspired Muslim bans​

Finally, let’s give the traitors what they want “The United States must not bar individuals from entering into the United States based on their religion, . . .”. Let’s only bar everyone engaged in a political movement sworn to destroy this country. Hell, such a ban would nail Socialists/Communists, too.

Ever since 9-11-2001 I’ve been saying that Islam should be legally defined as a political movement which it is, while Socialism/Communism should be defined as a religion which it is. In that way both are denied First Amendment protection. In short: Socialists would lose access to the public purse because it is a religion, while the war against Islam could be fought as a political movement.

Tweaking Trump | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

Long after the war is over, legally defining Islam as a political movement must remain in place —— at least until Muslims the world over eliminate theocracy from Islam’s teachings. (Don’t hold your breath until that happens.)

p.s. It will take a minimum of one century to verify that American Muslims who renounced theocracy were not engaging in Taqiyya & Kitman in order to hold onto Islam’s First Amendment protection.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So how about this. Every United Nations Muslim that comes here can only live in Vermont. Should they leave Vermont they either get deported immediately, or they do a nickel in a state prison at the expense of Vermont taxpayers. After all, they are responsible for Leahy. They are also responsible for any killing United Nations refugees do in every state.

I like it!

 

[Flanders]

Long after the war is over, legally defining Islam as a political movement must remain in place —— at least until Muslims the world over eliminate theocracy from Islam’s teachings. (Don’t hold your breath until that happens.)

This brief excerpt comes from another fabulous piece on the American Thinker:

While it's true that the majority of American Muslims are quite comfortable with the Constitution, the reality is that Islam lays claim to worldly authority in every nation. That means that it's possible to reject Muslim immigrants not because of their faith, but because it's not irrational to assume that the first civil loyalty of at least some Muslims, especially those from Muslim-majority countries, is to Islam, not the Constitution.

The current Muslim situation is not the first time America has been concerned with immigrants because of their faith. Historically, America discriminated against Catholics and Catholic immigration because many Protestants erroneously believed that Catholics wanted to establish a theocracy in America. Many laws with a religious test resulted from that concern.

But unlike the baseless scare over something the Catholic Church did not teach – namely, that the pope should be running America – Islam does teach, at the very least in the minds of many Muslims, that all countries should be theocracies. If anyone doubts that a large fraction of Muslims believe that Islam calls for sharia law, one only has to look at how things are run in most Muslim-majority countries. One can look in vain for all the Catholic-majority countries run by the pope or his bishops.

December 12, 2015
Islam: Not Just a Religion
By Tom Trinko

Articles: Islam: Not Just a Religion​

Do not miss the entire article if you are the least bit concerned about the First Amendment in relation to Islam —— THE POLITICAL MOVEMENT.

 

[Flanders]

Why don’t the UN-loving scum bags just drop the con job about refugees and implement the entire United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

“. . . Samantha Power, called “a larger global population of displaced that is larger now than 60 million.”

“The list of refugees in need unfortunately continues to grow — at the same time the international community has been utterly unable to keep up,” Ms. Power told reporters in New York on Monday. “This year has shown with painful clarity that our existing systems, approaches and funding are inadequate to the task at hand and to the amount of human suffering that is ongoing.”

Obama Plans Summit on Migrant Crisis
By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVISDEC. 21, 2015

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/22/world/middleeast/obama-plans-summit-on-migrant-crisis.html?_r=0​

Taqiyya the Liar knew what Samantha Power was before she became US Ambassador to the United Nations. Worse still, that nest of traitors in the US senate knew what she was before they confirmed her:

A member of the president's National Security Council who shares Noam Chomsky's foreign-policy goals? An influential presidential adviser whom 1960s revolutionary Tom Hayden treats as a fellow radical? A White House official who wrote a book aiming to turn an anti-American, anti-Israeli, Marxist-inspired, world-government-loving United Nations bureaucrat into a popular hero? Samantha Power, senior director of multilateral affairs for the National Security Council and perhaps the principal architect of our current intervention in Libya, is all of these things.

Samantha Power’s Power
On the ideology of an Obama adviser
By STANLEY KURTZ
April 5, 2011

Samantha Power’s Power - Ethics & Public Policy Center​

XXXXX​

. . . Kurtz calls Power “a patriot’s nightmare — a woman determined to subordinate America’s national sovereignty” to her own vision of how the world ought to work and what global role the US ought to play.

If you want to know why the lives of Americans pilots have been put at risk to carry out missions for Libyan rebels with mysterious motives and unclear objectives, and who has likely been pushing this idea inside the Obama Administration while singing about "humanitarianism," read the article.

Kurtz’s article is a fairly damning indictment of Power as an ideologue who doesn’t care in the least for America’s genuine national interests – and who therefore does not belong anywhere near the National Security Council or any other White House advisory role.

The ugly truth about Obama advisor Samantha Power
April 6, 2011 | Modified: March 16, 2012 at 7:26 am
Neil Hrab

The ugly truth about Obama advisor Samantha Power​

NOTE: Of all the douche bags the Senate confirmed on every level Samantha Power is the most obscene:

On an 87-10 vote Wednesday, the Senate approved the nomination of Samantha Power. Nearly 30 GOP senators voted with Democrats to approve her nomination.

“Having a strong voice in the United Nations is imperative,” Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) said ahead of the vote. “Power possesses the type of character, type of strong background, is a person of intellect and has the right kind of way to communicate to represent us at the United Nations.”​

One has to wonder about Senator Chambliss’ character and intellect when even Marco Rubio voted against her:

GOP Sens. Marco Rubio (Fla.), Rand Paul (Ky.), David Vitter (La.), Mike Lee (Utah), Ted Cruz (Texas), Tim Scott (S.C.), Mike Enzi (Wyo.), Dean Heller (Nev.), Richard Shelby (Ala.) and John Barrasso (Wyo.) voted against Power's nomination.

August 01, 2013, 09:05 pm
Samantha Power confirmed as Obama’s UN ambassador
By Ramsey Cox

Samantha Power confirmed as Obama’s UN ambassador​

 

[Flanders]

I had to read David Deming’s piece twice because it overwhelmed me. I pray that everyone takes a few minutes to read the article. It is this one sentence that blew me away:

We need a Constitutional Amendment to exclude Islam from the protections of the First Amendment.​

January 31, 2016
Islam and the First Amendment
By David Deming

Articles: Islam and the First Amendment​

An amendment is unnecessary. It only takes the Supreme Court defining a political movement for what it is to deny Islam the First Amendment’s protection:

Ever since 9-11-2001 I’ve been saying that Islam should be legally defined as a political movement which it is, while Socialism/Communism should be defined as a religion which it is. In that way both are denied First Amendment protection. In short: Socialists would lose access to the public purse because it is a religion, while the war against Islam could be fought as a political movement.