Top Searched Candidate by State Goes To?

[cereal_killer]

​

Trump supporters don't get too excited, it's easily explainable. It's USMB Dems/liberals looking to dig up 'dirt' on Trump

 

[Michelle420]

Are you voting for Trump ?

 

[Pogo]

View attachment 59962

​

Trump supporters don't get too excited, it's easily explainable. It's USMB Dems/liberals looking to dig up 'dirt' on Trump

It's reasonable. Why would one need to look up a candidate one already knows and/or supports?

 

[IcebergSlim]

View attachment 59962

​

Trump supporters don't get too excited, it's easily explainable. It's USMB Dems/liberals looking to dig up 'dirt' on Trump

It's reasonable. Why would one need to look up a candidate one already knows and/or supports?

Rube porn..

 

[cereal_killer]

Are you voting for Trump ?

yes

 

[JakeStarkey]

Rube porn is a good description.

The more they learn about Trump the less chance they will vote for him.

 

[jillian]

View attachment 59962

​

Trump supporters don't get too excited, it's easily explainable. It's USMB Dems/liberals looking to dig up 'dirt' on Trump

once again, trump has support from 40% of 47% of the electorate.

that doesn't mean he isn't amusing. I've googled him many times in reference to his failed business enterprises.

so there ya go.

 

[cereal_killer]

View attachment 59962

​

Trump supporters don't get too excited, it's easily explainable. It's USMB Dems/liberals looking to dig up 'dirt' on Trump

once again, trump has support from 40% of 47% of the electorate.

that doesn't mean he isn't amusing. I've googled him many times in reference to his failed business enterprises.

so there ya go.

Jillian with her percentages and probabilities again I guess that settles that....

 

[Foxfyre]

View attachment 59962

​

Trump supporters don't get too excited, it's easily explainable. It's USMB Dems/liberals looking to dig up 'dirt' on Trump

It's reasonable. Why would one need to look up a candidate one already knows and/or supports?

I certainly look up the candidates I already know and support to verify that my support is justified. And yes, I too have googled Donald Trump, not to dig up dirt on him, but to learn for myself why he is accused of this or that or praised for this or that in an effort to separate fact from partisan fiction.

 

[Militants]

Six best candidates for capitalism. No Bush in this year election. I don't believe Bush.

 

[jc456]

Rube porn is a good description.

The more they learn about Trump the less chance they will vote for him.

but who leads after how long's it been now?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

View attachment 59962

​

Trump supporters don't get too excited, it's easily explainable. It's USMB Dems/liberals looking to dig up 'dirt' on Trump

It's reasonable. Why would one need to look up a candidate one already knows and/or supports?

I certainly look up the candidates I already know and support to verify that my support is justified. And yes, I too have googled Donald Trump, not to dig up dirt on him, but to learn for myself why he is accused of this or that or praised for this or that in an effort to separate fact from partisan fiction.

But...but..but...partisan fiction is the life blood of this board!!!!

 

[Foxfyre]

View attachment 59962

​

Trump supporters don't get too excited, it's easily explainable. It's USMB Dems/liberals looking to dig up 'dirt' on Trump

It's reasonable. Why would one need to look up a candidate one already knows and/or supports?

I certainly look up the candidates I already know and support to verify that my support is justified. And yes, I too have googled Donald Trump, not to dig up dirt on him, but to learn for myself why he is accused of this or that or praised for this or that in an effort to separate fact from partisan fiction.

But...but..but...partisan fiction is the life blood of this board!!!!

And also why CK's graph is all red.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Are you voting for Trump ?

yes

This slays me every time, CK. You are a riot!

 

[Pogo]

View attachment 59962

​

Trump supporters don't get too excited, it's easily explainable. It's USMB Dems/liberals looking to dig up 'dirt' on Trump

It's reasonable. Why would one need to look up a candidate one already knows and/or supports?

I certainly look up the candidates I already know and support to verify that my support is justified. And yes, I too have googled Donald Trump, not to dig up dirt on him, but to learn for myself why he is accused of this or that or praised for this or that in an effort to separate fact from partisan fiction.

But...but..but...partisan fiction is the life blood of this board!!!!

And also why CK's graph is all red.

Yeah --- interesting the only candidates searched are all Republicans...

 

[Foxfyre]

View attachment 59962

​

Trump supporters don't get too excited, it's easily explainable. It's USMB Dems/liberals looking to dig up 'dirt' on Trump

It's reasonable. Why would one need to look up a candidate one already knows and/or supports?

I certainly look up the candidates I already know and support to verify that my support is justified. And yes, I too have googled Donald Trump, not to dig up dirt on him, but to learn for myself why he is accused of this or that or praised for this or that in an effort to separate fact from partisan fiction.

But...but..but...partisan fiction is the life blood of this board!!!!

And also why CK's graph is all red.

Yeah --- interesting the only candidates searched are all Republicans...

How did you draw that conclusion? All CK's graph shows is that Trump is the most googled candidate. I don't see anything that says other candidates are not also searched no matter who they are. It does appear that at least seven Republicans are more interesting than other candidates for whatever reason but that doesn't mean that others aren't googled.

 

[Pogo]

It's reasonable. Why would one need to look up a candidate one already knows and/or supports?

I certainly look up the candidates I already know and support to verify that my support is justified. And yes, I too have googled Donald Trump, not to dig up dirt on him, but to learn for myself why he is accused of this or that or praised for this or that in an effort to separate fact from partisan fiction.

But...but..but...partisan fiction is the life blood of this board!!!!

And also why CK's graph is all red.

Yeah --- interesting the only candidates searched are all Republicans...

How did you draw that conclusion? All CK's graph shows is that Trump is the most googled candidate. I don't see anything that says other candidates are not also searched no matter who they are. It does appear that at least seven Republicans are more interesting than other candidates for whatever reason but that doesn't mean that others aren't googled.

The attachment won't carry in a quote -- in fact it doesn't even show up in the thread for me, I had to load it in a separate page --- but when I did every single candidate I saw on the list was a Republican. That indicates that only Republicans get Googled. Some more than others but they're all Republicans.

Of course, since it is an attachment (and not a link) and has no corresponding source link to any story or study that would actually validate it, this could be nothing more than still yet more made-up crap from Googly Images where anyone can generate anything they want, so it's not to be taken seriously as a point.

(Actually looking back at the image, it has no source attribution at all, even within the image. Not even a fabricated one.
Which makes it, in Rhetorical Astrology, an "air sign". As in, nothing there. Hence this thread belongs in Political Humor.)

 

[Militants]

I hoped Jeb Bush now.

 

[Jackson]

I googled Trump a long time ago to see what his ideas were and if they would be compatible with my stances. It also helped me in discussing Trumps stand on the issues when posting or debating others.

I believe that is most likely the reason for others to look him up.