bucs90
Gold Member
- Feb 25, 2010
- 26,545
- 6,028
- 280
- Thread starter
- #61
You are apparently not capable of advanced discussion on innate human rights and our Founding principles.
You make a better follower.
Ok, YOU start it then.
Did that killer have a right to own an AR15? Did his mom? Yes on both. Did she have an innate responsibility to keep those guns from her crazy ass fucking coward of a son? YES.
Did she do that? No.
Ok. Now we have 26 dead innocent people.
YOU tell me: How do we deal with this?
IS YOUR ANSWER simply "We dont, its part of being free"?
You bring up a very interesting point. Of course we don't know anything about the mother. We don't know if she was like a lot of mothers who refused to accept her son's insanity. Did she fight to keep him in ordinary classes like a lot of mothers do? Did she reject all incidents of treating him differently? Were his formative years spent in a drug induced haze rather than treat him differently.
There is no way to totally end evil people or evil acts. If we didn't have a NON judgmental society we might be able to mitigate the damage.
Oh of course we'll never end evil. The devil is alive and well. We can only find new way sto fight it.
I heard his mother was trying..but she can only do so much without some help. Now..as for the guns, she should have had those secured far away from her whackjob son. Shes dead now, she wont have to answer for that.
As for all you morons who are only answering with cliche' bumber sticker comments and freedoms and comparing it to sodas and birth control and.....just seriously fuck off. Whose freedom was more precious? That dipshit shooters right to own that AR15, or those kids right to not be murdered in 1st grade?