More liberal racism against Asian-Americans:

https://www.princeton.edu/~tje/file...on Preferences Espenshade Chung June 2005.pdf

...In an earlier article in this journal, Espenshade, Chung, and Walling
(2004) examined the strength of admission preferences for underrepresented
minority students, athletes, and alumni children at three highly selective
private research universities in the United States. Using data from the Na-
tional Study of College Experience on 124,374 applications for admission
during the 1980s and the fall semesters of 1993 and 1997, they found that
elite universities give extra weight in admissions to candidates whose SAT
scores are above 1500, who are African American, and who are student
athletes.

A smaller, but nevertheless important, preference is extended to
Hispanic and legacy applicants. African-American applicants receive the

equivalent of 230 extra SAT points (on a 1600-point scale), and being
Hispanic is worth an additional 185 SAT points. Other things equal, re-
cruited athletes gain an admission bonus worth 200 points, while the pref-
erence for legacy candidates is worth 160 points. Asian-American applicants

face a loss equivalent to 50 SAT points.

The underrepresented minority advantage is greatest for African-American and Hispanic applicants whose SAT scores are in the 1200–1300 range, and not for applicants near the lower end of the SAT distribution as some have suggested (cf. Dugan et al., 1996)....


And this is just college admissions. Liberals also discriminate against Asians in media, Hollywood, upper level management in corporations, and government.

Liberals are the Nazis. Liberals are the party of the KKK, slavery, and Jim Crow. Liberals can eat a dick. #MAGA

Well, I'd agree that Asians don't get the privileges, or recognition that Blacks, or Hispanics do, because that would cut down the Liberal egalitarians.
 
But, most Whites in New York City, are Whites who came impoverished, and were mistreated, including groups like Jews, Italians, Irish Catholics, Poles etc.

And? You think minorities haven't been mistreated in NY or been impoverished?

I didn't say that, but the difference is many Jews, Asians, and White Catholics pulled themselves up, by education, savings, and wise investments.

Asian-Americans Have Highest Poverty Rate In NYC, But Stereotypes Make The Issue Invisible | HuffPost

Those are largely from new arrivals of Asians coming from much poorer nations like China, India, or the Philippines, but they still manage to have murder rates much lower than Blacks, or Hispanics, and probably within a generation, or 2 will largely be successful.

Source?

Okay. It's undoubtedly true that noncitizens, no matter how many productive traits they bring with them, face special challenges. Levitan produces data showing a strikingly higher proportion of the Asian ethnic sample (73%) were not born in the U.S. than any other broad group category--although naturalization rates also are higher. So that's a factor, as well as any proclivity for larger families--it's tough to grow up in the city and children are flags for poverty. Too, Levitan offers this significant observation: the overall Asian population appears more inclined to move to the suburbs as its wealth increases--thus leaving behind a larger percentage of poor among those still residing in New York City.

Asian Poor Seen Swelling in NYC

, showed the report released at the end of April, with much of it due to language barriers and non-immigrant citizens who have no access to the city's welfare system.

Increases in poverty were "particularly pronounced" for Asians and non-citizens, two groups that share considerable overlap, the report said.

"Poverty has grown fastest for the city's Asian population and for non-citizens, two overlapping groups who are heavily represented in Queens. Of the city's 3.1 million immigrants, 1.5 million are non-citizens and, of those, approximately one-third is unauthorized immigrants. Unauthorized immigrants are ineligible to receive most government benefits but many have native-born children who are
increased 30 percent in the last decade — and many Asian immigrants often find job opportunities for low-skill, low-paying jobs in Queens.

NYC's Asian immigrants have highest poverty rate|Across Americas|chinadaily.com.cn
 
Study Claims 80.5% of Artists Represented by NYC’s Top 45 Galleries Are White

The news may shock you if you were living in a cave, but this spring an “Arts in NYC” course taught at CUNY Guttman College by James Case-Leal has crunched the numbers to demonstrate how white the top of the commercial art gallery pyramid truly is.

What the students found was that in the 2016–17 season, 80.5% of all artists at the top 45 New York galleries were white, though if the statistics are parsed to focus only on US artists, then the percentage climbs to 88.1%. In a country that’s 64% white, that’s a drastic difference.

Other shocking statistics include the lack of Native American artists and the huge disparity between the Hispanic population in the US and artists in New York galleries (16% in general population vs. 1.2% in top New York galleries)...

CqrXbZ4.jpg


As I've said many times, liberals are the racists, segregationists, etc.

Okay, and?

White Americans are 72% of the country. 64% if you exclude Hispanics. Blacks are 12.6%.

Poverty impacts blacks and Hispanics far more than whites, like 7% to 25%.

It's a matter of what they want to go in for. I'm sure in the NBA and NFL black people get a higher figure than US demographics. You have to take that plunge, potentially work towards something without success and without money to achieve a dream. Some people are in a position to be able to cope with such demands because their parents have the money to back them up. Others aren't.

But, most Whites in New York City, are Whites who came impoverished, and were mistreated, including groups like Jews, Italians, Irish Catholics, Poles etc.

So what? What does this have to do with this topic?
 
Study Claims 80.5% of Artists Represented by NYC’s Top 45 Galleries Are White

The news may shock you if you were living in a cave, but this spring an “Arts in NYC” course taught at CUNY Guttman College by James Case-Leal has crunched the numbers to demonstrate how white the top of the commercial art gallery pyramid truly is.

What the students found was that in the 2016–17 season, 80.5% of all artists at the top 45 New York galleries were white, though if the statistics are parsed to focus only on US artists, then the percentage climbs to 88.1%. In a country that’s 64% white, that’s a drastic difference.

Other shocking statistics include the lack of Native American artists and the huge disparity between the Hispanic population in the US and artists in New York galleries (16% in general population vs. 1.2% in top New York galleries)...

CqrXbZ4.jpg


As I've said many times, liberals are the racists, segregationists, etc.

Okay, and?

White Americans are 72% of the country. 64% if you exclude Hispanics. Blacks are 12.6%.

Poverty impacts blacks and Hispanics far more than whites, like 7% to 25%.

It's a matter of what they want to go in for. I'm sure in the NBA and NFL black people get a higher figure than US demographics. You have to take that plunge, potentially work towards something without success and without money to achieve a dream. Some people are in a position to be able to cope with such demands because their parents have the money to back them up. Others aren't.

But, most Whites in New York City, are Whites who came impoverished, and were mistreated, including groups like Jews, Italians, Irish Catholics, Poles etc.

And? You think minorities haven't been mistreated in NY or been impoverished?

I didn't say that, but the difference is many Jews, Asians, and White Catholics pulled themselves up, by education, savings, and wise investments.

A lot of people pulled themselves up because they were able to band together as groups and not get knocked down by the system. Many black people have suffered racial abuse, unable to get jobs etc when white people could.
 
More liberal racism against Asian-Americans:

https://www.princeton.edu/~tje/file...on Preferences Espenshade Chung June 2005.pdf

...In an earlier article in this journal, Espenshade, Chung, and Walling
(2004) examined the strength of admission preferences for underrepresented
minority students, athletes, and alumni children at three highly selective
private research universities in the United States. Using data from the Na-
tional Study of College Experience on 124,374 applications for admission
during the 1980s and the fall semesters of 1993 and 1997, they found that
elite universities give extra weight in admissions to candidates whose SAT
scores are above 1500, who are African American, and who are student
athletes.

A smaller, but nevertheless important, preference is extended to
Hispanic and legacy applicants. African-American applicants receive the

equivalent of 230 extra SAT points (on a 1600-point scale), and being
Hispanic is worth an additional 185 SAT points. Other things equal, re-
cruited athletes gain an admission bonus worth 200 points, while the pref-
erence for legacy candidates is worth 160 points. Asian-American applicants

face a loss equivalent to 50 SAT points.

The underrepresented minority advantage is greatest for African-American and Hispanic applicants whose SAT scores are in the 1200–1300 range, and not for applicants near the lower end of the SAT distribution as some have suggested (cf. Dugan et al., 1996)....


And this is just college admissions. Liberals also discriminate against Asians in media, Hollywood, upper level management in corporations, and government.

Liberals are the Nazis. Liberals are the party of the KKK, slavery, and Jim Crow. Liberals can eat a dick. #MAGA
Liberals are the party of the KKK. Hey dumb-ass, there is no liberal party...Your need to lie only makes you look pathetic in every way.
 
Study Claims 80.5% of Artists Represented by NYC’s Top 45 Galleries Are White

The news may shock you if you were living in a cave, but this spring an “Arts in NYC” course taught at CUNY Guttman College by James Case-Leal has crunched the numbers to demonstrate how white the top of the commercial art gallery pyramid truly is.

What the students found was that in the 2016–17 season, 80.5% of all artists at the top 45 New York galleries were white, though if the statistics are parsed to focus only on US artists, then the percentage climbs to 88.1%. In a country that’s 64% white, that’s a drastic difference.

Other shocking statistics include the lack of Native American artists and the huge disparity between the Hispanic population in the US and artists in New York galleries (16% in general population vs. 1.2% in top New York galleries)...

CqrXbZ4.jpg


As I've said many times, liberals are the racists, segregationists, etc.

Okay, and?

White Americans are 72% of the country. 64% if you exclude Hispanics. Blacks are 12.6%.

Poverty impacts blacks and Hispanics far more than whites, like 7% to 25%.

It's a matter of what they want to go in for. I'm sure in the NBA and NFL black people get a higher figure than US demographics. You have to take that plunge, potentially work towards something without success and without money to achieve a dream. Some people are in a position to be able to cope with such demands because their parents have the money to back them up. Others aren't.

But, most Whites in New York City, are Whites who came impoverished, and were mistreated, including groups like Jews, Italians, Irish Catholics, Poles etc.

And? You think minorities haven't been mistreated in NY or been impoverished?

I didn't say that, but the difference is many Jews, Asians, and White Catholics pulled themselves up, by education, savings, and wise investments.

A lot of people pulled themselves up because they were able to band together as groups and not get knocked down by the system. Many black people have suffered racial abuse, unable to get jobs etc when white people could.

Blacks have had plenty of opportunities for 50 years now.

As the Asian pointed out Blacks with lower SAT scores are more likely to be accepted to college.

The evidence truly points to Blacks just not being as intelligent, or ambitious.
 
Okay, and?

White Americans are 72% of the country. 64% if you exclude Hispanics. Blacks are 12.6%.

Poverty impacts blacks and Hispanics far more than whites, like 7% to 25%.

It's a matter of what they want to go in for. I'm sure in the NBA and NFL black people get a higher figure than US demographics. You have to take that plunge, potentially work towards something without success and without money to achieve a dream. Some people are in a position to be able to cope with such demands because their parents have the money to back them up. Others aren't.

But, most Whites in New York City, are Whites who came impoverished, and were mistreated, including groups like Jews, Italians, Irish Catholics, Poles etc.

And? You think minorities haven't been mistreated in NY or been impoverished?

I didn't say that, but the difference is many Jews, Asians, and White Catholics pulled themselves up, by education, savings, and wise investments.

A lot of people pulled themselves up because they were able to band together as groups and not get knocked down by the system. Many black people have suffered racial abuse, unable to get jobs etc when white people could.

Blacks have had plenty of opportunities for 50 years now.

As the Asian pointed out Blacks with lower SAT scores are more likely to be accepted to college.

The evidence truly points to Blacks just not being as intelligent, or ambitious.

There are far more problems than ambition and intelligence. The problem is that certain people have an agenda and will show a few facts and try and make them say something they don't say.
 
But, most Whites in New York City, are Whites who came impoverished, and were mistreated, including groups like Jews, Italians, Irish Catholics, Poles etc.

And? You think minorities haven't been mistreated in NY or been impoverished?

I didn't say that, but the difference is many Jews, Asians, and White Catholics pulled themselves up, by education, savings, and wise investments.

A lot of people pulled themselves up because they were able to band together as groups and not get knocked down by the system. Many black people have suffered racial abuse, unable to get jobs etc when white people could.

Blacks have had plenty of opportunities for 50 years now.

As the Asian pointed out Blacks with lower SAT scores are more likely to be accepted to college.

The evidence truly points to Blacks just not being as intelligent, or ambitious.

There are far more problems than ambition and intelligence. The problem is that certain people have an agenda and will show a few facts and try and make them say something they don't say.

Judging by Africa, than yes there's no evidence of Black equality.

Oh, but boo hoo hoo, Blacks in Africa must have had it so hard too.

Go tell that to Chinese, Polish, Ukrainians, and so forth.
 

Forum List

Back
Top