Actually, I think people who want government to own our economy, like "single payer" is socialism. And I think that because it's the definition of socialism. I keep asking you for examples, and you can't think of any, which is why you're going to deflection.The problem we have is that socialists are now half the country forming a unified block. When one ideology is half the country, having third parties doesn't work because the one just dominates. The rest of us are trying to squeeze into the Republican party to provide a large enough opposition, but we fundamentally disagree on too many issues. Basically there are three groups. The fiscal conservatives, the social conservatives and the liberals who don't want to be Democrats for whatever reason.
For a third party to work, any two of them have to be larger than the third and we don't have that unless the Democratic party splits up. And they are so monolithic they couldn't disagree on what wall paper to put in the dining room.
Who are these socialists you're talking about? Name some names. Obama? No way. We haven't even had a real liberal in the white house, much less a socialist, since LBJ. The two party system could work if we had only taxpayer funded elections and actually jailed politicians that take bribes, which most do to fund their elections.
Kaz thinks everyone not in his far right world is a socialist.
The Heritage Foundation once suggested fining people for not having health care. It was a stupid idea and they said so. But that was the only thing they said. To call Obamacare as having been "created" by the Heritage Foundation is completely baseless.Even going so far as to label a plan which was created by the Heritage Foundation as socialism
Socialism is where government owns economic assets. Government controlling economic assets is "as far from socialism as possible." Actually, capitalism, which is economic freedom, is "as far from socialism as possible." Economic assets technically in private hands but under government control is fascism, which is also referred to as "socialism light" and inevitably ends up in government doing away with the ruse and going to full socialism.He is incapable of realizing the Affordable Care Act is a far from socialism as possible
The Republicans suck, no insight. But it's just further deflection. That Republicans said something stupid that in a loose way can support a Democratic plan doesn't prove it's not socialism, sorry Charlie.
No self respecting socialist would ever agree on the affordable care act which is why most of them oppose it.
Actually socialists across the country are supporting it and cheering it on to crush the industry, which is what it was designed to do, so government can make the predictable step of going from fascism to socialism.
All this deflection just goes to show you can't answer the original question. Give me things that your "Greens" and "Democrats" would disagree on since they aren't disagreeing on anything now. The amount of work you're going to so you can evade the question answers the question. Nothing.