TIME Stands By Erroneous Crying Girl Cover Story Because Of Its Propaganda Value

As TIME subscriptions fall by 50%.

They always have Spectrum, I guess.

Those monopolies need to be busted up, dammit!
 
TIME has no reason to lie.....

but right wing media does....:rolleyes:

You are better than this.
TIME issued a correction after getting caught.
TIME knew the two were not separated, but projected a narrative so readers would believe they were. "Border agents took them away to possibly be separated". They wrote that line knowing they were not.
ABC News broke that story, not exactly right wing media. TIME knew they were together at the time the cover was released.
How do you think that is not a lie?
 
TIME has no reason to lie.....

but right wing media does....:rolleyes:

You are better than this.
TIME issued a correction after getting caught.
TIME knew the two were not separated, but projected a narrative so readers would believe they were. "Border agents took them away to possibly be separated". They wrote that line knowing they were not.
ABC News broke that story, not exactly right wing media. TIME knew they were together at the time the cover was released.
How do you think that is not a lie?

That is how the Left operates.

It makes an untrue statement. Everyone sees it and screams outrage at the target. Then the Left gets called on it, and "apologizes" with as much subtlety as possible.

Everyone who misses the "apology" remains convinced of the validity of the statement, adding a few more to the pile of gullible idiots.
 
TIME has no reason to lie.....

but right wing media does....:rolleyes:
they corrected that this girl was not separated but stood by the picture, as their creative license...

it was never meant to depict a specific scenario of the crisis..... they have Trump standing there in a gorgeous suit, and he's been nowhere near the crisis at the border or this little girl.... has he? NO!

so the cover was to depict the overall sentiment in the public, towards the crisis....
 
they corrected that this girl was not separated but stood by the picture, as their creative license...

it was never meant to depict a specific scenario of the crisis..... they have Trump standing there in a gorgeous suit, and he's been nowhere near the crisis at the border or this little girl.... has he? NO!

so the cover was to depict the overall sentiment in the public, towards the crisis....


With the caption 'Welcome to America'?

:th_spinspin:

I can do that too...

It's actually meant to depict a powerful, compassionate man taking the time to smile at a frightened little girl desperately crying because her mother took her from her daddy, her brothers and sisters and the only home she's ever known, carted her miles across dangerous territory, paid thousands to a 'guide' to help her break US law and has already been deported once...if I had such a mother I'd cry too. She's appealing to President Trump to make her mommy take her back home.

And in America President Trump can make it happen - nor will it cost Mom thousands of dollars - we'll do it for free.

:beer:
 
Well, when they don't have actual facts to support their agenda, it's perfectly logical (in their worldview) to make up shit.
 
TIME has no reason to lie.....

but right wing media does....:rolleyes:

Time attached a correction to the story, saying “The original version of this story misstated what happened to the girl in the photo after she (was) taken from the scene. The girl was not carried away screaming by U.S. Border Patrol agents; her mother picked her up and the two were taken away together.”

What say you Care4all ?
 
That's how Liberals roll. Throw out the false propaganda and see if they get away with it. If they don't, then put out a weak retraction. The damage is done and no one pays attention to the retraction.
 
TIME has no reason to lie.....

but right wing media does....:rolleyes:
they corrected that this girl was not separated but stood by the picture, as their creative license...

it was never meant to depict a specific scenario of the crisis..... they have Trump standing there in a gorgeous suit, and he's been nowhere near the crisis at the border or this little girl.... has he? NO!

so the cover was to depict the overall sentiment in the public, towards the crisis....

No it wasnt. it was ti inflame people into the impression that Trump was causing little girls to be abused.
 
That's how Liberals roll. Throw out the false propaganda and see if they get away with it. If they don't, then put out a weak retraction. The damage is done and no one pays attention to the retraction.

They do it every day. When called on it they issue a weak retraction, as you said, but its already out there. (((They))) know what they are doing when they do this.
 
TIME has no reason to lie.....

but right wing media does....:rolleyes:

So, you don't consider photoshopping a child onto the cover of their magazine from a situation that didn't really have anything to do with Trump's policy to be lying? Interesting.
 

Forum List

Back
Top