Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #61
Fewer people were sednt to those unemployment rolls because of the sstimulus.
That is a fact.
That is a fact.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's nice. But you are ignoring the fact that New Mexico's unemployment rate is currently at an all time high due to jobs lost. Up from 6.0 in 2009 to 8.7 for Feb 2010.
But, don't forget the management at LANL is happy.
$212 million? Hell, I would be thrilled to death to have 1/20th of that.
Immie
Never!!!!!!
It will be a cold day in Madonna's crotch before I admit I have ever been wrong.
Though I may have to use some "nuance" regarding my oppostion to the invention of fire.
What part of a near depression do you not understand?
Would you perfer the people who didnt get fired got fired too?
Bush and team left a HUGE economic mess and you think the Dems should have ot cleaned up in ONE year?
Tell me how long did it take Bush to get us out of the small recession that started under Clinton?
Fewer people were sednt to those unemployment rolls because of the sstimulus.
That is a fact.
Fewer people were sednt to those unemployment rolls because of the sstimulus.
That is a fact.
Fewer people were sednt to those unemployment rolls because of the sstimulus.
That is a fact.
Well,except for the 677 layed of from this company...right (to just name one).
Convergys to lay off 677 in New Mexico
Business Courier of Cincinnati: Convergys to lay off 677 in New Mexico
Fewer people were sednt to those unemployment rolls because of the sstimulus.
That is a fact.
LOL
My God you really are thick skulled.
You cannot prove that. You can show all the LANL's you want, but you cannot show that without this package we would not already be out of the recession and in a real economic upturn as to the one the Administration is attempting to make us believe we are in.
Immie
What part of a near depression do you not understand?
Would you perfer the people who didnt get fired got fired too?
Bush and team left a HUGE economic mess and you think the Dems should have ot cleaned up in ONE year?
Tell me how long did it take Bush to get us out of the small recession that started under Clinton?
Fewer people were sednt to those unemployment rolls because of the sstimulus.
That is a fact.
LOL
My God you really are thick skulled.
You cannot prove that. You can show all the LANL's you want, but you cannot show that without this package we would not already be out of the recession and in a real economic upturn as to the one the Administration is attempting to make us believe we are in.
Immie
Immie those companies and countys that I just posted saying the stimulus had them hiring people they would not have been hiring without it PROOVE that it saved and created jobs.
Some will say things would have been worse without it. I say prove that while at the same time I realize proving it is impossible.
I foolishly believed people were honest about their desires and goals for the country. I see that I was only a naive idealist.
I once believed that everyone wants to be free. Now i know some just want control.
Are you drunk?Fewer people were sednt to those unemployment rolls because of the sstimulus.
That is a fact.
LOL
My God you really are thick skulled.
You cannot prove that. You can show all the LANL's you want, but you cannot show that without this package we would not already be out of the recession and in a real economic upturn as to the one the Administration is attempting to make us believe we are in.
Immie
Immie those companies and countys that I just posted saying the stimulus had them hiring people they would not have been hiring without it PROOVE that it saved and created jobs.
Earth to TM go back and READ what I asked you to prove. It had nothing to do with saved and created jobs. It had everything to do with proving that we are better off today than we would have been without the Stimulus package and you cannot do that.
To do so, you would need to have an alternate universe set up exactly like things were from the moment President Obama signed the bill and then allowed things to go on their own separate paths. IMPOSSIBLE! Just as I said.
In a moment I will edit and add my post:
Immie
Immie those companies and countys that I just posted saying the stimulus had them hiring people they would not have been hiring without it PROOVE that it saved and created jobs.
Earth to TM go back and READ what I asked you to prove. It had nothing to do with saved and created jobs. It had everything to do with proving that we are better off today than we would have been without the Stimulus package and you cannot do that.
To do so, you would need to have an alternate universe set up exactly like things were from the moment President Obama signed the bill and then allowed things to go on their own separate paths. IMPOSSIBLE! Just as I said.
In a moment I will edit and add my post:
Immie
You enjoy banging your head against the wall with that lunatic Immie?
Fewer people were sednt to those unemployment rolls because of the sstimulus.
That is a fact.
Well,except for the 677 layed of from this company...right (to just name one).
Convergys to lay off 677 in New Mexico
Business Courier of Cincinnati: Convergys to lay off 677 in New Mexico
How did this happen due to the stimulus?
Trying to twist and squirm and trump up negatives in an effort to argue that the economy in NOT on much more solid footing than it was a year ago is absurd.
The bond vigilantes are finally flexing their muscles. A long period of stability for the US government bond market showed signs of cracking this week as a lack of investor appetite for new debt sent the benchmark 10-year yield to its highest level since last June.
For more than a year, analysts have been warning that record sized debt sales by the US Treasury were at odds with a 10-year yield sitting comfortably below 4 per cent. This week, the yield on 10-year notes jumped from 3.65 per cent to a peak of 3.92 per cent on Thursday. On Friday it was 3.87 per cent.
Falling inflation, rising unemployment, the housing market slump, the Federal Reserves policies of a near zero overnight borrowing rate and its purchase of up to $1,700bn in bonds have all helped keep Treasury yields near historic lows.
But this week the mood shifted as yields for $118bn of new US debt were much higher than forecast, sparking overall selling of Treasuries.
FT.com / Capital Markets - Supply fears start to hit Treasuries