This Will Explode A Few Regressives Heads

[OKTexas]

I saw an interview with Trump on Hannity last night, I'm really surprised regressives haven't posted a thousand threads on it by now, screaming and cursing Trump. But since they haven't I figured what the hell.

During the interview Sean asked Trump what supreme court justices would he try to replicate if he had the opportunity to appoint one or more judges to the court. To my utter surprise he said Scalia and Thomas. Maybe this guy is more conservative than many are giving him credit for.

Your thoughts?

You will believe anything. That is why you still watch Hannity.

Trump will tell you just what you want to hear. And you, my friend, will believe it. After all.....he "says what you are thinking"!!

Why haven't liberals started thtreads on this? I'll tell you. First...we know that Trump will not become president. Second....we know he's full of shit. Third.....we don't care when he says something on Hannity. Our issue with Trump is that he's making America look like a land full idiots in front of the world's citizens. Nobody BUT idiots is watching Hannity. No harm done.

Dupe.

Yet here you are, LMAO. Also you seem to be making assumptions you have no hope of backing up.

I am? Which ones are those?

First, the way this election year is going you have no idea who may prevail, weren't you folks saying he'd never run? Then didn't you claim he'd flame out in short order? Didn't you continually claim is remarks would put him out of the running? How's all that working for ya?

Second, he's no more full of shit than your two amazing candidates. Your claim that no one wants hear what he has to say is shown bogus by all the threads you regressives have posted on him.

Third, who the fuck cares what the rest of the world thinks, every time those pussies get in trouble they come running to us for help and we're still stupid enough to give it to them.

 

[OKTexas]

Your thoughts?

My thoughts are that he's in full pander mode. It's exactly the kind of salesman response I would expect. I don't believe him for a second.

Like the other 9 candidates in the race aren't. Do you believe anything they say?

 

[SwimExpert]

Your thoughts?

My thoughts are that he's in full pander mode. It's exactly the kind of salesman response I would expect. I don't believe him for a second.

Like the other 9 candidates in the race aren't. Do you believe anything they say?

To various degrees. Not sure what that has to do with anything, though.

 

[OKTexas]

Well all I can say is Thomas, Alito and Scalia get it right more often than not, where Roberts, Kennedy and Stevens only get it right about half the time, and the rest are most always wrong.

Your opinion is noted but irrelevant to your claim of "Constitutional type judges like Thomas and Scalia tend to drop the hammer on presidents who stray outside their constitutional limits," where you've been shown two cases where they didn't reign in a president's overreach.

Right, one that didn't make it to the supreme court. Also I guess you missed the point that the case was dismissed by one of the most regressive courts of appeal, the 9th.

Wrong. That dismissal was appealed and sent to the Supreme Court. They decided not to take the case. In a case where the president was wiretapping without first getting warrants, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to end that practice and chose not to.

Here's you a big hint child, it takes more than a couple of judges to decline to hear a case. I can't find anything that has a record of the vote on that case, except to say Alito didn't participate in the discussion or decision.

... and Hamdan ... ?

Already gave you my thoughts on that one, do you have a comprehension problem?

 

[OKTexas]

Your thoughts?

My thoughts are that he's in full pander mode. It's exactly the kind of salesman response I would expect. I don't believe him for a second.

Like the other 9 candidates in the race aren't. Do you believe anything they say?

To various degrees. Not sure what that has to do with anything, though.

It has as much to do with it as your unsubstantiated opinions on everything else, which is all you've provided to this point.

 

[SwimExpert]

Your thoughts?

My thoughts are that he's in full pander mode. It's exactly the kind of salesman response I would expect. I don't believe him for a second.

Like the other 9 candidates in the race aren't. Do you believe anything they say?

To various degrees. Not sure what that has to do with anything, though.

It has as much to do with it as your unsubstantiated opinions on everything else, which is all you've provided to this point.

Has nothing to do with it, other than the fact that you are basically implying that Trump should be believed because someone else has lied at times. Funny how you ask people for their thoughts, but really you just want people to come to a very specific conclusion. Any "thoughts" outside of the same, and you reject them.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I saw an interview with Trump on Hannity last night, I'm really surprised regressives haven't posted a thousand threads on it by now, screaming and cursing Trump. But since they haven't I figured what the hell.

During the interview Sean asked Trump what supreme court justices would he try to replicate if he had the opportunity to appoint one or more judges to the court. To my utter surprise he said Scalia and Thomas. Maybe this guy is more conservative than many are giving him credit for.

Your thoughts?

Dubya said something similar, so did his Dad

 

[OKTexas]

Your thoughts?

My thoughts are that he's in full pander mode. It's exactly the kind of salesman response I would expect. I don't believe him for a second.

Like the other 9 candidates in the race aren't. Do you believe anything they say?

To various degrees. Not sure what that has to do with anything, though.

It has as much to do with it as your unsubstantiated opinions on everything else, which is all you've provided to this point.

Has nothing to do with it, other than the fact that you are basically implying that Trump should be believed because someone else has lied at times. Funny how you ask people for their thoughts, but really you just want people to come to a very specific conclusion. Any "thoughts" outside of the same, and you reject them.

Nope, just expect rational adults to be able to provide the reasoning behind their opinions. Trump base his on years of friendship with Thomas, so far you have given nothing to support yours.

 

[OKTexas]

I saw an interview with Trump on Hannity last night, I'm really surprised regressives haven't posted a thousand threads on it by now, screaming and cursing Trump. But since they haven't I figured what the hell.

During the interview Sean asked Trump what supreme court justices would he try to replicate if he had the opportunity to appoint one or more judges to the court. To my utter surprise he said Scalia and Thomas. Maybe this guy is more conservative than many are giving him credit for.

Your thoughts?

Dubya said something similar, so did his Dad

Yep, W got duped by Roberts, so did many others.

 

[SwimExpert]

Nope, just expect rational adults to be able to provide the reasoning behind their opinions. Trump base his on years of friendship with Thomas, so far you have given nothing to support yours.

Actually, I did give my reasons. I told you, it's exactly the kind of response I would expect from a salesman.

That aside, since when does anyone need to justify not believing a politician? Or in this case, pseudo-politician...

 

[OKTexas]

Nope, just expect rational adults to be able to provide the reasoning behind their opinions. Trump base his on years of friendship with Thomas, so far you have given nothing to support yours.

Actually, I did give my reasons. I told you, it's exactly the kind of response I would expect from a salesman.

That aside, since when does anyone need to justify not believing a politician? Or in this case, pseudo-politician...

Name one politician who isn't a salesman, so in your mind your opinion could apply to any of them.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I saw an interview with Trump on Hannity last night, I'm really surprised regressives haven't posted a thousand threads on it by now, screaming and cursing Trump. But since they haven't I figured what the hell.

During the interview Sean asked Trump what supreme court justices would he try to replicate if he had the opportunity to appoint one or more judges to the court. To my utter surprise he said Scalia and Thomas. Maybe this guy is more conservative than many are giving him credit for.

Your thoughts?

You will believe anything. That is why you still watch Hannity.

Trump will tell you just what you want to hear. And you, my friend, will believe it. After all.....he "says what you are thinking"!!

Why haven't liberals started thtreads on this? I'll tell you. First...we know that Trump will not become president. Second....we know he's full of shit. Third.....we don't care when he says something on Hannity. Our issue with Trump is that he's making America look like a land full idiots in front of the world's citizens. Nobody BUT idiots is watching Hannity. No harm done.

Dupe.

Yet here you are, LMAO. Also you seem to be making assumptions you have no hope of backing up.

I am? Which ones are those?

First, the way this election year is going you have no idea who may prevail, weren't you folks saying he'd never run? Then didn't you claim he'd flame out in short order? Didn't you continually claim is remarks would put him out of the running? How's all that working for ya?

Second, he's no more full of shit than your two amazing candidates. Your claim that no one wants hear what he has to say is shown bogus by all the threads you regressives have posted on him.

Third, who the fuck cares what the rest of the world thinks, every time those pussies get in trouble they come running to us for help and we're still stupid enough to give it to them.

I'm willing.....as always....to make the "leave USMB" bet with you, my blowhard friend. If Trump becomes POTUS...I leave. If he doesn't you leave. Simple.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Trump won't be picking any judges because he won't be president.

 

[LoneLaugher]

When is the OP going to give us his reason as to why no liberals have brought this issue up since the Trumpster did his Hannity interview?

Our heads are supposed to explode. You'd think a thread or two would be a given.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I saw an interview with Trump on Hannity last night, I'm really surprised regressives haven't posted a thousand threads on it by now, screaming and cursing Trump. But since they haven't I figured what the hell.

During the interview Sean asked Trump what supreme court justices would he try to replicate if he had the opportunity to appoint one or more judges to the court. To my utter surprise he said Scalia and Thomas. Maybe this guy is more conservative than many are giving him credit for.

Your thoughts?

He's still the most Liberal of all the GOP candidates.

Do you seriously think the baby shrub or Kaisch would attempt to nominate another Scalia or Thomas, I don't.

I wouldn't bother to guess whom he would nominate. But saying he would nominate conservative justices does not make him Liberal. His actions and positions on tbe issues do which is why he ranks among the most Liberal of all the GOP candidates.

But it does tend to counter the regressives narrative that all he wants is the power of the dear leaders pen and phone.

Whose pushing that narrative? Got any names?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

This will explode some GOP heads
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia reported dead
Dallas Morning News (blog)-2 minutes ago
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died of apparent natural causes Saturday on a luxury resort in West Texas, the San Antonio Express ...

 

[LoneLaugher]

WTF!

 

[NYcarbineer]

I saw an interview with Trump on Hannity last night, I'm really surprised regressives haven't posted a thousand threads on it by now, screaming and cursing Trump. But since they haven't I figured what the hell.

During the interview Sean asked Trump what supreme court justices would he try to replicate if he had the opportunity to appoint one or more judges to the court. To my utter surprise he said Scalia and Thomas. Maybe this guy is more conservative than many are giving him credit for.

Your thoughts?

It's the primary season.

And?

And of course in the GOP primary season when you're Donald Trump who will pander anywhere anytime he's going to give that sort of answer to that sort of question.

Of course you're basing that opinion on the fact he has ran such a conventional campaign so far, right? I think you might be confusing him with your hildabitch.

I don't support Clinton. Stop lying.

 

[OKTexas]

I saw an interview with Trump on Hannity last night, I'm really surprised regressives haven't posted a thousand threads on it by now, screaming and cursing Trump. But since they haven't I figured what the hell.

During the interview Sean asked Trump what supreme court justices would he try to replicate if he had the opportunity to appoint one or more judges to the court. To my utter surprise he said Scalia and Thomas. Maybe this guy is more conservative than many are giving him credit for.

Your thoughts?

You will believe anything. That is why you still watch Hannity.

Trump will tell you just what you want to hear. And you, my friend, will believe it. After all.....he "says what you are thinking"!!

Why haven't liberals started thtreads on this? I'll tell you. First...we know that Trump will not become president. Second....we know he's full of shit. Third.....we don't care when he says something on Hannity. Our issue with Trump is that he's making America look like a land full idiots in front of the world's citizens. Nobody BUT idiots is watching Hannity. No harm done.

Dupe.

Yet here you are, LMAO. Also you seem to be making assumptions you have no hope of backing up.

I am? Which ones are those?

First, the way this election year is going you have no idea who may prevail, weren't you folks saying he'd never run? Then didn't you claim he'd flame out in short order? Didn't you continually claim is remarks would put him out of the running? How's all that working for ya?

Second, he's no more full of shit than your two amazing candidates. Your claim that no one wants hear what he has to say is shown bogus by all the threads you regressives have posted on him.

Third, who the fuck cares what the rest of the world thinks, every time those pussies get in trouble they come running to us for help and we're still stupid enough to give it to them.

I'm willing.....as always....to make the "leave USMB" bet with you, my blowhard friend. If Trump becomes POTUS...I leave. If he doesn't you leave. Simple.

Let's just put it this way, I won't bet Trump will become president, on the other hand, I'm also not dumb enough to bet he won't. At this point anything is possible.

 

[LoneLaugher]

This will explode some GOP heads
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia reported dead
Dallas Morning News (blog)-2 minutes ago
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died of apparent natural causes Saturday on a luxury resort in West Texas, the San Antonio Express ...

After looking.....and looking.....I think it's finally been confirmed.

What a weird "coinkidink".

Commence politicizing his death in 3......2.......1!