This Sheriff has my support

No one's gonna take up arms and revolt if gun rights are curtailed. At the end of the day they'll just get drunk, bitch and moan, then fall asleep.

Been far more draconian measures adopted in the past that they threatened the same stuff they are now and nothing came of it. Sheriffs are elected politicians, he's just stirring the pot to get more votes.
 
No one's gonna take up arms and revolt if gun rights are curtailed. At the end of the day they'll just get drunk, bitch and moan, then fall asleep.

Agreed. There was a time in America where such a thing may have been possible, but certainly not anymore.
 
As HBO's series "The Newsroom" rightly pointed out, every time someone claims the government's gonna ban your guns, gun sales spike, and campaign donations to anti gun control politicians go through the roof.

Don't believe the hype.
 
Rather than believing everything you read, do what journalists do and get at least 3 different un-related sources (preferably sources which hate one another.) Then you'll know what's actually going on.
 
As HBO's series "The Newsroom" rightly pointed out, every time someone claims the government's gonna ban your guns, gun sales spike, and campaign donations to anti gun control politicians go through the roof.

Don't believe the hype.
Same thing on the war on women, cutting school lunch, yada yada yada
 
As HBO's series "The Newsroom" rightly pointed out, every time someone claims the government's gonna ban your guns, gun sales spike, and campaign donations to anti gun control politicians go through the roof.

Don't believe the hype.

That's a good thing. We need more anti-gun control politicians. Go NRA!:eusa_clap:
 
Guns are not even remotely close to being banned.

Guns are so closely "regulated" in some jurisdictions which tantamounts to banning:

Update On The Mr. Filippidis, Maryland Concealed Carry Driver Incident…

Following our public records request (actually, on the same day) the Maryland Transportation Authority Police (MDTA) posted the following statement on their FaceBook Page:

In response to a recent complaint about the Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA) Police and a Jan. 12, 2014, Tampa Tribune article, a preliminary review indicates that all proper protocols were followed throughout the Dec. 30, 2013, 55-minute traffic stop on I-95, which was initiated for a speeding violation. The MDTA takes these allegations seriously and will continue to investigate this personnel matter. (link)

As we wait for the records of the incident it’s interesting to note the position of the MTA.

If “proper protocols were followed” then why did the MDTA Chief and Internal Affairs apologize to Mr. Filippidis? Also, if “proper protocols were followed” then why then is this a “personnel matter“?"

.
 
Guns are not even remotely close to being banned.

Guns are so closely "regulated" in some jurisdictions which tantamounts to banning:

Update On The Mr. Filippidis, Maryland Concealed Carry Driver Incident…

Following our public records request (actually, on the same day) the Maryland Transportation Authority Police (MDTA) posted the following statement on their FaceBook Page:

In response to a recent complaint about the Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA) Police and a Jan. 12, 2014, Tampa Tribune article, a preliminary review indicates that all proper protocols were followed throughout the Dec. 30, 2013, 55-minute traffic stop on I-95, which was initiated for a speeding violation. The MDTA takes these allegations seriously and will continue to investigate this personnel matter. (link)

As we wait for the records of the incident it’s interesting to note the position of the MTA.

If “proper protocols were followed” then why did the MDTA Chief and Internal Affairs apologize to Mr. Filippidis? Also, if “proper protocols were followed” then why then is this a “personnel matter“?"

.

:lol::cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
Do any of you gun owners hold rank in the well-regulated militia?
 

Forum List

Back
Top