This is why you don’t elect Democrats

/——-/ Donald Trump wanted to bring the troops home, but on the deadline of May 1. But you libtards just had to run him out of town. Now you have Dementia Joe screwing the pooch.
“Never underestimate Joe’s ability to fuck things up.” - B Obama
And now Quid Pro's face is on it. He wanted the job, they wanted to give it to him, and now it's his.
 
And now Quid Pro's face is on it. He wanted the job, they wanted to give it to him, and now it's his.
what I can't figure out is, why did demofks object to Trump bringing troops home, and now support Biden? WTF? What's fking wrong with you demofks? Why did you object to Trump doing it? What changed? please educate my dumb ass.
 
The Taliban now controls Afghanistan just as it does the United States.
Politics, power, control and damn liberty, freedom, truth and common sense.
 
The Taliban were from the Mujahedeen, so were emphatically anti-communists.


Time and again, upon viewing what you post, one can only conclude a lack of reading and a general lack of educatioin.

You're a dunce.


Here's where we move on to the Middle East.

Communism was the first of the new mass movements in Europe, and the first to flourish in the Middle East as well. Europe’s Fascist and fascist-style movements began in the years after World War One. The major difference was that Communists and Marxists, aimed to show how similar they were in every country…the Fascists’ aims were to show how local and parochial, how ‘nationalist’ and ancient its interests were.


a. Baath Socialism had its myth of man and history, the Arab nation was it’s people of God, corrupted and polluted by forces within and forces without. From Michel Aflaq, the founder and greatest of the Baathi theoreticians: "The philosophies and teachings that come from the West invade the Arab mind and steal his loyalty.”


b. And the people of evil who corrupted the nation of God, were, of course, the Jews. Pan-Arabists of one kind or another were responsible for the anti-Semitic outbreaksof the ‘40’s and ‘60’s.
The Arabs, in this projection, would return to their “pure, original nature” by revering the revolutionary Leader who embodied the “Arab Spirit,” the spirit one embodied in the Prophet Muhammad himself. This meant unlimited mass obedience, and this implied following the political organization, or the state.

This view was not only totalitarian, but another element that traces back to the Enlightenment- nihilism.




. Khomeini’s advance represents the adaptability of Islamism: he was the Shiite version. He was violently opposed to ‘jahili’ barbarism, and a champion of the Islamic Empire of old. And he added to the ideas a bit of Marxism, about the wretched of the earth and the salvation of the poor, and of course this was perfectly compatible with the idea of social justice. He transformed Islamist thinking into a version of liberation theology.
 
Whenever someone finds Biden, they should ask him what he wants to surrender next.
 
/——-/ Donald Trump wanted to bring the troops home, but on the deadline of May 1. But you libtards just had to run him out of town. Now you have Dementia Joe screwing the pooch.
“Never underestimate Joe’s ability to fuck things up.” - B Obama
Were sending in the 1/6 insurrectionists to stabilize the country...
 
what I can't figure out is, why did demofks object to Trump bringing troops home, and now support Biden? WTF? What's fking wrong with you demofks? Why did you object to Trump doing it? What changed? please educate my dumb ass.
Just think about you supporting the former president peace accord with the Taliban and withdrawal by May 1st to wanting to continue the war now.
 
The Taliban are a faction of the CIA organized Mujahedeen. That were our allies until we turned on them.
That is 100% false. Everything you post is misinformation. You literally just make shit up.

We didn’t “turn” on anyone. Osama Bin Laden turned on us when we launched Gulf War operations from Saudi Arabia. He was furious that American boots hit the ground of his “home” nation (even though Saudi Arabia invited us to launch from their country).

After the 9/11 attacks, we told the Taliban to surrender Al Qaeda and warned them what would happen if they didn’t. They refused.
 
In what way could the Taliban possibly be guilty of anything?
Clearly Rigby5 here is a disinformation account. He’s either Chinese, Russian, or muslim.

The Taliban raped women, then stoned them to death for being “promiscuous”. They prevented girls from getting an education. Their human rights record is atrocious. And they aided & abetted Al Qaeda.

Those are the ways they were “guilty” of anything, dill-hole.
 
And there was not reason for the US to turn on them, since they had nothing at all to do with the WTC attacks.
That ^ is the drivel and garbage one posts when they are ignorant of history.

We told the Taliban to turnover Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. They refused. Refusal wasn’t an option. :finger3:
 
Because repukes believe war improves the economy.
Not only does war improve the economy but after the war “nation building“ offers great opportunities for corruption.
 
Not only does war improve the economy but after the war “nation building“ offers great opportunities for corruption.
So what you’re saying is small, limited, constitutional government is the only acceptable option then? Uh. Interesting.
 

Forum List

Back
Top