Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Flight 77 was hijacked and the hijackers crashed it into the Pentagon. Done, end of story.
the problem you have is you have detached from realityFlight 77 was hijacked and the hijackers crashed it into the Pentagon. Done, end of story.
and what other fairy tales do you have to tell the world? again for the hundreth time,just because thats what you WANT to believe,doesnt mean thats what happened that day.oh and might want to read his post where he posted proof that explosives were used at the pentagan that day like there were with the towers instead of reading the posts that you always want to see because they fit your delusional version of what happened that day.
And again you dumb shit, where is the evidence of explosives laid in one of the most heavily guarded buildings in the Country? Where are the plane, crew and passengers from the flight that according to you must have disappeared? Why did the people on the jet stop talking on cell phones after the strike?
You are aware a wife of a Cabinent member was on the supposed missing aircraft? And she called her husband when the Hijacking occurred?
Did this plane fly to the super secret base the Penn plane flew too?
Flight 77 was hijacked and the hijackers crashed it into the Pentagon. Done, end of story.
and what other fairy tales do you have to tell the world? again for the hundreth time,just because thats what you WANT to believe,doesnt mean thats what happened that day.oh and might want to read his post where he posted proof that explosives were used at the pentagan that day like there were with the towers instead of reading the posts that you always want to see because they fit your delusional version of what happened that day.
where's that twilight zone music when we need it?
The 9-11 report was insufficient. If everything is on the up and up, why is the report incomplete?
They take more time investigating normal plane crashes than they did looking into what exactly happened on 9-11.
We can only assume they are hiding something.
But psycologists say that people like you don't want to know the truth, because then you would have to do something about it. And, you don't want to believe our leaders could be this evil.
And funny, the Bush/Chaney defenders now suggest Obama is the sinister liar. To me, he seems sincere. We shall see.
One things for sure, Bush and Chaney should be in prison. Why is the President of Sudan being charged with war crimes but not Bush?
Judges at the International Criminal Court have issued an arrest warrant for the president of Sudan, Omar al-Bashir, for war crimes and crimes against humanity. But they stopped short of charging him with genocide, as prosecutors wanted.
Bush could be next:
George Bush could be next on the war crimes list - World - NZ Herald News
THE HAGUE George W. Bush could one day be the International Criminal Court's next target.
where's that twilight zone music when we need it?
The 9-11 report was insufficient. If everything is on the up and up, why is the report incomplete?
They take more time investigating normal plane crashes than they did looking into what exactly happened on 9-11.
We can only assume they are hiding something.
But psycologists say that people like you don't want to know the truth, because then you would have to do something about it. And, you don't want to believe our leaders could be this evil.
And funny, the Bush/Chaney defenders now suggest Obama is the sinister liar. To me, he seems sincere. We shall see.
One things for sure, Bush and Chaney should be in prison. Why is the President of Sudan being charged with war crimes but not Bush?
Judges at the International Criminal Court have issued an arrest warrant for the president of Sudan, Omar al-Bashir, for war crimes and crimes against humanity. But they stopped short of charging him with genocide, as prosecutors wanted.
Bush could be next:
George Bush could be next on the war crimes list - World - NZ Herald News
THE HAGUE George W. Bush could one day be the International Criminal Court's next target.
yep.thats exactly why the 9/11 apologists dont want to know the truth because they know they would have to do something about it and thats a thought that scares them which is what the government counts on.
Flight 77 was hijacked and the hijackers crashed it into the Pentagon. Done, end of story.
and what other fairy tales do you have to tell the world? again for the hundreth time,just because thats what you WANT to believe,doesnt mean thats what happened that day.oh and might want to read his post where he posted proof that explosives were used at the pentagan that day like there were with the towers instead of reading the posts that you always want to see because they fit your delusional version of what happened that day.
What about Barbara Olson? I guess she faked her own death. and Ted Olson has been hiding her for seven years.
The 9-11 report was insufficient. If everything is on the up and up, why is the report incomplete?
They take more time investigating normal plane crashes than they did looking into what exactly happened on 9-11.
We can only assume they are hiding something.
But psycologists say that people like you don't want to know the truth, because then you would have to do something about it. And, you don't want to believe our leaders could be this evil.
And funny, the Bush/Chaney defenders now suggest Obama is the sinister liar. To me, he seems sincere. We shall see.
One things for sure, Bush and Chaney should be in prison. Why is the President of Sudan being charged with war crimes but not Bush?
Judges at the International Criminal Court have issued an arrest warrant for the president of Sudan, Omar al-Bashir, for war crimes and crimes against humanity. But they stopped short of charging him with genocide, as prosecutors wanted.
Bush could be next:
George Bush could be next on the war crimes list - World - NZ Herald News
THE HAGUE – George W. Bush could one day be the International Criminal Court's next target.
yep.thats exactly why the 9/11 apologists dont want to know the truth because they know they would have to do something about it and thats a thought that scares them which is what the government counts on.
what else ya got? a fake moon landing? Jack Ruby in the sewer aiming at Kennedy's limousine? Roosevelt using american planes on Pearl Harbor?
Greetings to All:
The Pentagon was attacked on 9/11 by a rogue element inside the U.S. military using a plan that almost failed at the very beginning. The inside-job bad guys used a retrofitted and radio-controlled A-3 TNT-filled Jet to launch a missile attack (like this) at 9:31:39 AM (see FAA Timeline here) on Column Line (CL) 14 using this flight path, but the complicated maneuvers caused the radio operator to lose control and altitude at the critical moment, which caused the starboard wing to begin clipping the five downed light poles. The radio operator had a panic attack for fear that the painted up A-3 would crash into the Pentagon lawn, so he pulled back on the joystick to create what the CIT boys are calling the Flyover Plane, NOT at 9:38 AM, but at 9:31:39 AM when the Pentagon clocks stopped. The radio operator then began making a wide turn to the north that was witnessed by the C-130 pilot and many other people, until making the final attack strike on the Wedge One Wall between CL 9 and CL 15 at 9:36:27 AM just about 5 minutes later to create Terry Cohen's "Terrible Explosion" that took place 'after' the Original 9:31:39 AM attack.
Terry Cohen News Video
The problem for our inside-job bad guys is that the Pentagon Limestone-clad masonry wall required the inside explosion from the missile strike, in coordination with the A-3 CL 9-15 massive explosion, to take down the E-Ring roof during the original 9:31:39 AM attack run. This attack location was chosen far in advance because of the CL 11 control-joint that would bring down the E-Ring roof very effectively. However, the A-3 Jet was forced over the E-Ring roof at 9:31:39 AM and also struck the second story concrete slab in the 9:36:27 AM attack, which means the E-Ring roof fell just one foot (look carefully at the control joint above the fire truck) to become wedged tightly against the northern side of CL-11. Our inside-job bad guys then had a terrible problem, because many explosive charges were needed to eventually bring the E-Ring Roof down at 10:15 AM about 45 minutes after the original missile attack.
Pentagon News 5 Video
This means the inside-job bad guys had to go around fabricating the many different Official Timelines (link) that are filled with contradictions (ACAAR = Page 200) in order to give their fake Flight 77 Cover Story the resemblance of credibility. The inside-job bad guys have been working everyday running their counterintelligence disinformation campaigns to cover their tracks from that time to today.
Lloyd Englands taxi was struck by Pole #1 during the 9:31:39 AM missile strike, which is the reason he saw a single smoke plume (Barbara Honegger's paper) from the original small CL 13-15 entry hole (picture). While he and his partner were wrestling around with the light pole, then the A-3 Jet created the Big Boom* that knocked him down and almost killed him for the second time in just 5 minutes. :0) Many people think the light pole evidence was staged, because they are BLIND to the 911Truth that we have been looking at two attacks (LetsRoll thread) all along. The second Big Boom happened 5 minutes later at 9:36:27 AM, while Lloyd and his helper were removing the pole from his windshield. The next series of explosions started at 9:42 AM, which is event #27 on my Pentagon Timeline here.
The reason you have so much confusion and contradiction between all these Pentagon witnesses is because some of them saw the 9:31:39 AM A-3 Flyover and others saw the actual Jet hit the Pentagon at 9:36:27 AM like these two witnesses:
Michael Kelly News Video
Don Wright News Video
The 9:31:39 AM witnesses saw the A-3 disappear into the single smoke plume on the South-of-Citgo Flight Path, while the 9:36:27 AM witnesses saw the same painted-up Jet crash into the Pentagon wall using the North-of-Citgo Fight Path shown here. The 9:31:39 AM witnesses saw the light poles flying around (witness link), but the 9:36:27 AM people saw no signs of any light poles being hit along the North-of-Citgo Flight Path. That is the reason some so-called Pentagon Investigators think the light pole evidence is all staged. :0) We have small bits of Jet debris (pic), because the A-3 was blown into a kazillion bits at impact. Nobody has ever found one piece of any real Boeing 757-200 Jetliner debris, because this damage and this damage was NOT created by any real 100-Ton Jetliner going any 530 miles per hour. :0) That is the reason no 'time-change' parts (story) have ever been produced by the inside-job FBI/Bushie Administration bad guys in the first place. The damage pattern (pic) is consistent with a three attack scenario from the 9:31:39 AM missile strike, the 9:36:27 AM Jet attack and the subsequent Controlled-Demolition Explosions that eventually brought the E-Ring roof down at 10:15 AM.
Nobody can show you a picture of a crashed 100-Ton Jetliner at the Pentagon (Expert Video), because nothing like that ever happened.
GL,
Terral
uh, ted didnt dieand what other fairy tales do you have to tell the world? again for the hundreth time,just because thats what you WANT to believe,doesnt mean thats what happened that day.oh and might want to read his post where he posted proof that explosives were used at the pentagan that day like there were with the towers instead of reading the posts that you always want to see because they fit your delusional version of what happened that day.
What about Barbara Olson? I guess she faked her own death. and Ted Olson has been hiding her for seven years.
I never said Barbara and Ted didnt die.Of course they died,more than likely murdered by the CIA when the real aircraft dissapeared.Guess your not aware that a flight operater said it dissapeared out of sight off the rader for over 20 minutes and the location of the airliner was a mystery to them? sure she died,just not in the way you want to believe she did.
youtube is likely getting sick of having you morons post the same bullshit on their servers time after timeGreetings to All:
The Pentagon was attacked on 9/11 by a rogue element inside the U.S. military using a plan that almost failed at the very beginning. The inside-job bad guys used a retrofitted and radio-controlled A-3 TNT-filled Jet to launch a missile attack (like this) at 9:31:39 AM (see FAA Timeline here) on Column Line (CL) 14 using this flight path, but the complicated maneuvers caused the radio operator to lose control and altitude at the critical moment, which caused the starboard wing to begin clipping the five downed light poles. The radio operator had a panic attack for fear that the painted up A-3 would crash into the Pentagon lawn, so he pulled back on the joystick to create what the CIT boys are calling the Flyover Plane, NOT at 9:38 AM, but at 9:31:39 AM when the Pentagon clocks stopped. The radio operator then began making a wide turn to the north that was witnessed by the C-130 pilot and many other people, until making the final attack strike on the Wedge One Wall between CL 9 and CL 15 at 9:36:27 AM just about 5 minutes later to create Terry Cohen's "Terrible Explosion" that took place 'after' the Original 9:31:39 AM attack.
Terry Cohen News Video
The problem for our inside-job bad guys is that the Pentagon Limestone-clad masonry wall required the inside explosion from the missile strike, in coordination with the A-3 CL 9-15 massive explosion, to take down the E-Ring roof during the original 9:31:39 AM attack run. This attack location was chosen far in advance because of the CL 11 control-joint that would bring down the E-Ring roof very effectively. However, the A-3 Jet was forced over the E-Ring roof at 9:31:39 AM and also struck the second story concrete slab in the 9:36:27 AM attack, which means the E-Ring roof fell just one foot (look carefully at the control joint above the fire truck) to become wedged tightly against the northern side of CL-11. Our inside-job bad guys then had a terrible problem, because many explosive charges were needed to eventually bring the E-Ring Roof down at 10:15 AM about 45 minutes after the original missile attack.
Pentagon News 5 Video
This means the inside-job bad guys had to go around fabricating the many different Official Timelines (link) that are filled with contradictions (ACAAR = Page 200) in order to give their fake Flight 77 Cover Story the resemblance of credibility. The inside-job bad guys have been working everyday running their counterintelligence disinformation campaigns to cover their tracks from that time to today.
Lloyd Englands taxi was struck by Pole #1 during the 9:31:39 AM missile strike, which is the reason he saw a single smoke plume (Barbara Honegger's paper) from the original small CL 13-15 entry hole (picture). While he and his partner were wrestling around with the light pole, then the A-3 Jet created the Big Boom* that knocked him down and almost killed him for the second time in just 5 minutes. :0) Many people think the light pole evidence was staged, because they are BLIND to the 911Truth that we have been looking at two attacks (LetsRoll thread) all along. The second Big Boom happened 5 minutes later at 9:36:27 AM, while Lloyd and his helper were removing the pole from his windshield. The next series of explosions started at 9:42 AM, which is event #27 on my Pentagon Timeline here.
The reason you have so much confusion and contradiction between all these Pentagon witnesses is because some of them saw the 9:31:39 AM A-3 Flyover and others saw the actual Jet hit the Pentagon at 9:36:27 AM like these two witnesses:
Michael Kelly News Video
Don Wright News Video
The 9:31:39 AM witnesses saw the A-3 disappear into the single smoke plume on the South-of-Citgo Flight Path, while the 9:36:27 AM witnesses saw the same painted-up Jet crash into the Pentagon wall using the North-of-Citgo Fight Path shown here. The 9:31:39 AM witnesses saw the light poles flying around (witness link), but the 9:36:27 AM people saw no signs of any light poles being hit along the North-of-Citgo Flight Path. That is the reason some so-called Pentagon Investigators think the light pole evidence is all staged. :0) We have small bits of Jet debris (pic), because the A-3 was blown into a kazillion bits at impact. Nobody has ever found one piece of any real Boeing 757-200 Jetliner debris, because this damage and this damage was NOT created by any real 100-Ton Jetliner going any 530 miles per hour. :0) That is the reason no 'time-change' parts (story) have ever been produced by the inside-job FBI/Bushie Administration bad guys in the first place. The damage pattern (pic) is consistent with a three attack scenario from the 9:31:39 AM missile strike, the 9:36:27 AM Jet attack and the subsequent Controlled-Demolition Explosions that eventually brought the E-Ring roof down at 10:15 AM.
Nobody can show you a picture of a crashed 100-Ton Jetliner at the Pentagon (Expert Video), because nothing like that ever happened.
GL,
Terral
Hey Terral,I just tried to watch that Michael kelly video the second one and its not working.They deleted it.thats what youtube always does with these 9/11 videos.Go figure,they allow you to post videos of porn there but they delete 9/11 videos all the time. what a free country this is huh?
Wrong. The Pentagon was attacked by Islamic Terrorists who hijacked planes and used them as missiles:Greetings to All:
The Pentagon was attacked on 9/11 by a rogue element inside the U.S. military using a plan that almost failed at the very beginning.
9-11 Research: Pentagon Aircraft Debris
Newsflash! Multiple witnesses see Plane hit the Pentagon eight years ago!Should Large Aircraft Pieces Be Evident? The absence of of large pieces of aircraft in photographs stikes many observers as incongruous with the crash of a large jetliner such as the 757 that Flight 77 was. Many people have seen photographs of jetliner crashes in which large sections of the planes remain intact. However, a high-speed crash into a hardened target such as a building is not comparable to typical crash incidents. Furthermore, even crashes into terrain, most of them at much slower speeds than the crashes on 9/11/01, often leave very little in the way of recognizable aircraft parts.
One case for comparison is the crash test of an F-4 fighter jet into a concrete barrier at 480 mph. The crash converted the plane into confetti. Another case is the crash of a C-130 cargo transport plane into a 10-story apartment building in Azari, Iran. Photographs of the crash site show few visible aircraft parts. These cases demonstrate that planes flying into buildings can have the effect of reducing the plane to very small pieces
[youtube]XdxzqqZ3e2s[/youtube]
Admit it Terral, you're just another idiot who doesn't want to defend himself against Islam so you cling to insane conspiracy theories as a way of not having to confront a deadly reality.
As Yoda would probably say: "Hmm, no good, you're theories are!"
Hi Retired:
Lets try again shall we? The supposed evidence that an A-3 struck the building is based on misinformation, wishful thinking and out right lies.
But lets play with it shall we?
Some questions.
How did the "bad guys" get explosives into the Pentagon?
No. If Retired really went back to read what I did present in the Opening Post of this thread, then you would at least quote >> something from my work, before running off at the mouth to begin asking a new round of questions.
Quote something from MY WORK that you want to address FOR CONTEXT and then offer your rebuttals, counterproposals or take the low road and simply begin asking related questions.
I am more than happy to address the questions of anyone writing on this thread, so long as you take one minute to quote >> from my work, so everybody is on the same page and I have some idea of what you are talking about.
Retired is characterizing my interpretations of the evidence and I refuse to continue doing all the work in the deliberation process . . .
GL,
Terral
troofers do make for fun entertainmentI would laugh at some of the posts in this thread...
...but I hold back, because it's rude to laugh at people that have severe mental illness.
troofers do make for fun entertainmentI would laugh at some of the posts in this thread...
...but I hold back, because it's rude to laugh at people that have severe mental illness.
lol
well, they DO tend to do the same things over and over and over againtroofers do make for fun entertainmentI would laugh at some of the posts in this thread...
...but I hold back, because it's rude to laugh at people that have severe mental illness.
lol
As do gerbils on a wheel.
well, they DO tend to do the same things over and over and over againtroofers do make for fun entertainment
lol
As do gerbils on a wheel.
lol