Discussion in 'Congress' started by Angelo, Oct 21, 2019.
I'm sorry -- I don't see Mueller's factual determination of corrupt intent.
Isn’t he suing a cow?
which should tell y’all everything about Nunes.
Yeah those Holsteins. They know how to Teat slap you silly.
It’s no coincidence that Democrats have gone apoplectic about the memo. It clearly shows that the FBI, under the direction of then-Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andy McCabe, presented paid political dirt to the Foreign Surveillance Intelligence Court in order to obtain warrants to spy on American citizens.
'Nunes memo' revelations prove the FBI makes up its own rules
Democrats refuted Nunes' memo.
Most importantly Mueller never got to interview President Trump. The closest he got was Trump and his lawyers answering mutually agreed to questions that severely limited the scope Mueller was probing.
Rudy Giuliani called letting President Trump sit down for a deposition would be "perjury trap" Or as others would observe, that Trump can't help but lie.
lol... no worries, donny may not have skirted that 'rusher' thing once the full report is unredacted & it's not looking good for roger stone & his role in all of this. everything between russia & ukraine might be tied altogether in a pretty package. besides, donny very well might be looking at obstruction charges in this latest round of articles CONcerning ukraine. anyhoo, just like with OJ - couldn't nab him the first time, but he couldn't quite go free in the end.
You understand that, absent a factual determination of corrupt intent, there can be no obstruction of justice - right?
And, since Mueller made no such factual determination, there is no factual basis for a charge of obstruction of justice - right?
you don't understand that he was a special counsel - not a prosecutor. donny covering for his son thru his ridiculous tweeting aboard air force one re: the 'adoptions' was a blatant lie.
i'll bet that's listed in the top 10 examples he gave. your arms must be dead tired carrying that water for so long.
This does not affect what I said in any way.
No factual determination of corrupt intent = no obstruction of justice.
Separate names with a comma.