PK1
Gold Member
- Jun 26, 2015
- 3,900
- 525
- 140
Both senseless Christian as well as Muslim terror killings got LOTS of attention.You made a claim without any rational support:
“the idea of you not being a bigot is... very unlikely.”
WHY UNLIKELY?
YOU make a claim, YOU need evidence.
You made the original claim of not being a bigot. So provide evidence to that effect. Or stop quoting me endlessly.
I said i am not a bigot. I say that because i do not discriminate & vilify ANY group of people.So, why is my claim “unlikely”?
Easy. Because anyone who has political biases or leanings discriminates. Even me. Discriminating is not confined to race or ethnic creed. In my case, the ability to discriminate means I can identify the differences between religions, and the similarities. The Muslims in Christchurch, or the Christians in Sri Lanka. All they were doing was expressing their faith. And they were murdered for it.
But only one got attention while the other was completely ignored.
So, why is your claim unlikely? Why am I calling you out on it?
Simply because if you have the slightest ability to differentiate between religions, that gives you a pathway to being bigoted.
Why do you claim otherwise?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/
Home - BBC News