eflatminor
Classical Liberal
- May 24, 2011
- 10,643
- 1,669
- 245
I believe the silencers are for those afflicted with Delusions of 007 as they await their mission instructions.
Of course you do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe the silencers are for those afflicted with Delusions of 007 as they await their mission instructions.
A MUST-READ FOR GUNTARDS
Similarly, there is no legitimate reason for gun-sellers to be peddling militarized accessories, like high-capacity ammunition magazines, speed loaders and such.
But individual access to legally obtained firearms is explicitly guaranteed by the Constitution a fact reaffirmed by the US Supreme Court as recently as 2010.
Constitutions are not easily amended thats the point, after all and the 2nd Amendment would be a particularly tough nut to crack. Politically, even indigo states trend purple on guns.
So while a case can be made for stronger national gun laws, it needs to be advanced with profound respect for the constitutional issues involved.
Why is the left constantly and consistently targeting legal gun owners?
Oh, the awful language makes me so sad...
Three weeks and the gun cult still can't offer one valid reason.
Reason and logic (and public safety) is not their strong suit.
Three weeks and the gun cult still can't offer one valid reason.
Reason and logic (and public safety) is not their strong suit.
Just because something looks like a military weapon does not mean it is a military weapon.
An AR 15 is functionally no different than any other semiauto rifle.
This weapon
Is no different than this weapon
Both are semiautomatic rifles
Both fire the same .223 round at the same rate
But one of them looks scarier.
Three weeks and the gun cult still can't offer one valid reason.
Reason and logic (and public safety) is not their strong suit.
Just because something looks like a military weapon does not mean it is a military weapon.
An AR 15 is functionally no different than any other semiauto rifle.
This weapon
Is no different than this weapon
Both are semiautomatic rifles
Both fire the same .223 round at the same rate
But one of them looks scarier.
Which one of those rifles were used in the recent mass killings? It was the rifle on the top photo, wasn't it? And why did the shooters use the Bushmaster AR15 instead of the other rifle? Do you know the answers?
And in the world of gun sales, when comparing numbers of guns sold betweent the two rifles, which rifle sells the best and why? Them being the same and all.
A MUST-READ FOR GUNTARDS
Similarly, there is no legitimate reason for gun-sellers to be peddling militarized accessories, like high-capacity ammunition magazines, speed loaders and such.
But individual access to legally obtained firearms is explicitly guaranteed by the Constitution a fact reaffirmed by the US Supreme Court as recently as 2010.
Constitutions are not easily amended thats the point, after all and the 2nd Amendment would be a particularly tough nut to crack. Politically, even indigo states trend purple on guns.
So while a case can be made for stronger national gun laws, it needs to be advanced with profound respect for the constitutional issues involved.
People can have the right to military style weapons the same way the military people have a right to those weapons -
They can be kept in secure facilities, made available to individuals under strict accountability and scrutiny,
and used in defined areas - for example shooting ranges - under strict supervision.
That's good enough for the military; it's good enough for the civilian population.
The more the Left tells us we don't need guns, the greater the need for ammo and guns.
A MUST-READ FOR GUNTARDS
Similarly, there is no legitimate reason for gun-sellers to be peddling militarized accessories, like high-capacity ammunition magazines, speed loaders and such.
But individual access to legally obtained firearms is explicitly guaranteed by the Constitution a fact reaffirmed by the US Supreme Court as recently as 2010.
Constitutions are not easily amended thats the point, after all and the 2nd Amendment would be a particularly tough nut to crack. Politically, even indigo states trend purple on guns.
So while a case can be made for stronger national gun laws, it needs to be advanced with profound respect for the constitutional issues involved.
There is every legitimate reason for gun-sellers to sell militarized accessories. when you have the Drug Cartel running though your property with the same type of accessories and semi automatic rifles.
People can have the right to military style weapons the same way the military people have a right to those weapons -
They can be kept in secure facilities, made available to individuals under strict accountability and scrutiny,
and used in defined areas - for example shooting ranges - under strict supervision.
That's good enough for the military; it's good enough for the civilian population.
People can have the right to military style weapons the same way the military people have a right to those weapons -
They can be kept in secure facilities, made available to individuals under strict accountability and scrutiny,
and used in defined areas - for example shooting ranges - under strict supervision.
That's good enough for the military; it's good enough for the civilian population.
Brilliant post!!
I wish our leaders could articulate the argument that well!!