Theory of the day, structure beyond universe pulling matter

[hadit]

Told you guys, dark matter just dissapeared because now something beyond the universe is pulling mass toward it, which eliminates the need for dark matter.

Again, no one knows anything, as suck all is possible and meaningless

Universe mystery: Strange ‘structure’ could lie beyond known universe - NASA shock claim

So where do you think all the matter is hiding?

Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

Kid the reason for this new theory is that no dark matter is needed, the attractive force is coming from outside the universe. Please try to keep up, I know it's hard but you might just get left back or sent to peel potatoes.

You keep looking thru the telescope, the market dropped today and new buys just opened up.

Really, funny how all the astronomers are still paying off their PHD and Bill Gates is a dropout

Still don't think telescopes can track objects in the sky?

The funny thing is that fools like you see this and know that

God is not real
The age of the universe (changes yearly by a billion years or so)
It's all a computer simulation because
85 percent of it is missing
unless the big magnets outside this universe are pulling stuff

Yo, if you see something and do not know what it is, then take a photo of it...……….

Drumroll, you still do not know what it is but at least you can show the photo to other people who also will not know what it is.

You keep avoiding the question. Why is that?

It's very simple. Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

 

[Frannie]

Shes purdy embarrassing...I was reading another thread just now and this crack-addict doesnt know the functionality of a basic fucking telescope...and the loon wants to toss the science it doesnt even understand and thinks "cuz gawd" is a replacement

lol...for my LOL givers...i didnt even mean that as a joke...

Imagine the guy at a party talking about how "science is bullshit" and doesn't even know the first thing about a telescope. i believe telescopes are first introduced at the elderly age of 2nd grade.

Screaming on the internet like an obsessive recluse about how science is wrong means you're cousins with the ancient aliens guy with ru paul's hairstyle

Astronomers point a telescope at the sky, find something they know nothing about, take a picture and then declare what they just took a picture is. In reality if you do not know what it is, a picture just gives you a picture of something that you do not know what it is. Wait, then somebody writes a book telling you what it is and you buy the BS, they also have your money

Zero refuting information. Comical actually

Your opinion is irrelevant. Youre an elderly type...yelling about kids these days and whining to a magical sky fairy...you dont even know the basics of how a fucking telescope


a fucking...t e l e s c o p e

works...and you want anyone on the internet to consider your opinion as anything valid, in the ethosphere?




Amazing!!

You deserve the darwin award, thats 100

Thanks for your lack of input...…………………

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No input is better then ass backwards wrong input...

Now, back to your regularly scheduled episode of "bitchy little troll whines about people making fun of him"...

 

[Frannie]

Told you guys, dark matter just dissapeared because now something beyond the universe is pulling mass toward it, which eliminates the need for dark matter.

Again, no one knows anything, as suck all is possible and meaningless

Universe mystery: Strange ‘structure’ could lie beyond known universe - NASA shock claim

So where do you think all the matter is hiding?

Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

Kid the reason for this new theory is that no dark matter is needed, the attractive force is coming from outside the universe. Please try to keep up, I know it's hard but you might just get left back or sent to peel potatoes.

You keep looking thru the telescope, the market dropped today and new buys just opened up.

Really, funny how all the astronomers are still paying off their PHD and Bill Gates is a dropout

Still don't think telescopes can track objects in the sky?

The funny thing is that fools like you see this and know that

God is not real
The age of the universe (changes yearly by a billion years or so)
It's all a computer simulation because
85 percent of it is missing
unless the big magnets outside this universe are pulling stuff

Yo, if you see something and do not know what it is, then take a photo of it...……….

Drumroll, you still do not know what it is but at least you can show the photo to other people who also will not know what it is.

You keep avoiding the question. Why is that?

It's very simple. Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

What kind of telescope would that be, I presume you know that there are other types besides optical. So little one you will need to specify what type of telescope you are referring too.

These are non optical scopes

• Atmospheric Cherenkov telescope used to detect gamma rays

• Infrared telescope

• Radio telescope

• Submillimeter telescope

• Ultraviolet telescope (see also Ultraviolet astronomy)

• X-ray telescope (see also X-ray astronomy)
  • Wolter telescope

Here are a few more

Refracting telescopes (Dioptrics)

• Achromatic telescope
  • dialytic refractor
• Apochromatic
• Binoculars
  • Opera glasses
• Copyscope
• Galileoscope
• Monocular
• Non-achromatic
  • Galilean telescope
  • Keplerian Telescope
    • Aerial telescope
• Superachromat
• Varifocal gas-lens telescope
• Baden-Powell's unilens

Reflecting telescopes (Catoptrics)

• Cassegrain telescope
  • Dall–Kirkham telescope
  • Nasmyth telescope
  • Ritchey–Chrétien telescope
• Gregorian telescope
• Herrig telescope
• Herschelian telescope
• Large liquid mirror telescope
• Newtonian telescope
  • Dobsonian telescope
• Pfund telescope
• Schiefspiegler telescope
• Stevick–Paul telescope
• Three-mirror anastigmat
• Toroidal reflector / Yolo telescope
• Wolter telescope

Catadioptric telescopes (Catadioptrics)

• Argunov–Cassegrain telescope
• Catadioptric dialytes
• Klevtsov–Cassegrain telescope
• Lurie–Houghton telescope
• Maksutov telescope
  • Maksutov camera
  • Maksutov–Cassegrain telescope
    • Rutten Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
    • Sub-aperture corrector Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
  • Maksutov Newtonian telescope
• Modified Dall–Kirkham telescope
• Schmidt camera
  • Baker-Nunn camera
  • Baker-Schmidt camera
  • Lensless Schmidt telescope
  • Mersenne-Schmidt camera
  • Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope
    • ACF Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope (Meade Instruments)
  • Schmidt–Newton telescope
  • Schmidt-Väisälä camera

Now do be my guest kid, tell us how they all work and which one you use to focus on the only woman you have ever seen naked.

CIAO

 

[G.T.]

Told you guys, dark matter just dissapeared because now something beyond the universe is pulling mass toward it, which eliminates the need for dark matter.

Again, no one knows anything, as suck all is possible and meaningless

Universe mystery: Strange ‘structure’ could lie beyond known universe - NASA shock claim

So where do you think all the matter is hiding?

Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

Kid the reason for this new theory is that no dark matter is needed, the attractive force is coming from outside the universe. Please try to keep up, I know it's hard but you might just get left back or sent to peel potatoes.

You keep looking thru the telescope, the market dropped today and new buys just opened up.

Really, funny how all the astronomers are still paying off their PHD and Bill Gates is a dropout

Still don't think telescopes can track objects in the sky?

The funny thing is that fools like you see this and know that

God is not real
The age of the universe (changes yearly by a billion years or so)
It's all a computer simulation because
85 percent of it is missing
unless the big magnets outside this universe are pulling stuff

Yo, if you see something and do not know what it is, then take a photo of it...……….

Drumroll, you still do not know what it is but at least you can show the photo to other people who also will not know what it is.

You keep avoiding the question. Why is that?

It's very simple. Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

Frannie... telling the top brains on our literal planet that brought us cell phones, sattellites, aviation technology, GPS, the cures for thousands of previously deadly diseases...

that they're making shit up...

And frannie...proves she doesnt even know what 2nd graders know about telescopes...believes in the magical invisible sky pixie

All makes sense, to be honest! lol!!

 

[Frannie]

So where do you think all the matter is hiding?

Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

Kid the reason for this new theory is that no dark matter is needed, the attractive force is coming from outside the universe. Please try to keep up, I know it's hard but you might just get left back or sent to peel potatoes.

You keep looking thru the telescope, the market dropped today and new buys just opened up.

Really, funny how all the astronomers are still paying off their PHD and Bill Gates is a dropout

Still don't think telescopes can track objects in the sky?

The funny thing is that fools like you see this and know that

God is not real
The age of the universe (changes yearly by a billion years or so)
It's all a computer simulation because
85 percent of it is missing
unless the big magnets outside this universe are pulling stuff

Yo, if you see something and do not know what it is, then take a photo of it...……….

Drumroll, you still do not know what it is but at least you can show the photo to other people who also will not know what it is.

You keep avoiding the question. Why is that?

It's very simple. Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

Frannie... telling the top brains on our literal planet that brought us cell phones, sattellites, aviation technology, GPS, the cures for thousands of previously deadly diseases...

that they're making shit up...

And frannie...proves she doesnt even know what 2nd graders know about telescopes...believes in the magical invisible sky pixie

All makes sense, to be honest! lol!!

Put all the top brains on planet Earth in one place and ask them to agree on something...…………………

The fact is that not one or all of them know where humans came from, what the universe is in fact their answers to this would be as factual as if you ask a down syndrome individual.

The sad thing is that you do not understand the words theoretical physics. Do you really think the krap in the cripples books are fact

This is why all you morons voted for Hillary

 

[G.T.]

Kid the reason for this new theory is that no dark matter is needed, the attractive force is coming from outside the universe. Please try to keep up, I know it's hard but you might just get left back or sent to peel potatoes.

You keep looking thru the telescope, the market dropped today and new buys just opened up.

Really, funny how all the astronomers are still paying off their PHD and Bill Gates is a dropout

Still don't think telescopes can track objects in the sky?

The funny thing is that fools like you see this and know that

God is not real
The age of the universe (changes yearly by a billion years or so)
It's all a computer simulation because
85 percent of it is missing
unless the big magnets outside this universe are pulling stuff

Yo, if you see something and do not know what it is, then take a photo of it...……….

Drumroll, you still do not know what it is but at least you can show the photo to other people who also will not know what it is.

You keep avoiding the question. Why is that?

It's very simple. Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

Frannie... telling the top brains on our literal planet that brought us cell phones, sattellites, aviation technology, GPS, the cures for thousands of previously deadly diseases...

that they're making shit up...

And frannie...proves she doesnt even know what 2nd graders know about telescopes...believes in the magical invisible sky pixie

All makes sense, to be honest! lol!!

Put all the top brains on planet Earth in one place and ask them to agree on something...…………………

The fact is that not one or all of them know where humans came from, what the universe is in fact their answers to this would be as factual as if you ask a down syndrome individual.

The sad thing is that you do not understand the words theoretical physics. Do you really think the krap in the cripples books are fact

This is why all you morons voted for Hillary

I think youre on a device invented by the folks youre mocking and meanwhile you dont even know how a basic telescope works and also believe in a magical sky fairy because youre susceptible(gullible) to religuous propaganda.

And i find it FFFFfffffFFFfFFucking hilarious!!! Keep bangin'

 

[Frannie]

Still don't think telescopes can track objects in the sky?

The funny thing is that fools like you see this and know that

God is not real
The age of the universe (changes yearly by a billion years or so)
It's all a computer simulation because
85 percent of it is missing
unless the big magnets outside this universe are pulling stuff

Yo, if you see something and do not know what it is, then take a photo of it...……….

Drumroll, you still do not know what it is but at least you can show the photo to other people who also will not know what it is.

You keep avoiding the question. Why is that?

It's very simple. Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

Frannie... telling the top brains on our literal planet that brought us cell phones, sattellites, aviation technology, GPS, the cures for thousands of previously deadly diseases...

that they're making shit up...

And frannie...proves she doesnt even know what 2nd graders know about telescopes...believes in the magical invisible sky pixie

All makes sense, to be honest! lol!!

Put all the top brains on planet Earth in one place and ask them to agree on something...…………………

The fact is that not one or all of them know where humans came from, what the universe is in fact their answers to this would be as factual as if you ask a down syndrome individual.

The sad thing is that you do not understand the words theoretical physics. Do you really think the krap in the cripples books are fact

This is why all you morons voted for Hillary

I think youre on a device invented by the folks youre mocking and meanwhile you dont even know how a basic telescope works and also believe in a magical sky fairy because youre susceptible(gullible) to religuous propaganda.

And i find it FFFFfffffFFFfFFucking hilarious!!! Keep bangin'

Dude the device I am on is not theoretical, like the forces pulling the computer generated matrix universe that your great professors now believe, except for the ones now claiming that there is a great big magnet filling in for the 85 percent of the universe they lost, and bye the way I built this machine, my son builds them too.

Yawn, play on little one

 

[G.T.]

The funny thing is that fools like you see this and know that

God is not real
The age of the universe (changes yearly by a billion years or so)
It's all a computer simulation because
85 percent of it is missing
unless the big magnets outside this universe are pulling stuff

Yo, if you see something and do not know what it is, then take a photo of it...……….

Drumroll, you still do not know what it is but at least you can show the photo to other people who also will not know what it is.

You keep avoiding the question. Why is that?

It's very simple. Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

Frannie... telling the top brains on our literal planet that brought us cell phones, sattellites, aviation technology, GPS, the cures for thousands of previously deadly diseases...

that they're making shit up...

And frannie...proves she doesnt even know what 2nd graders know about telescopes...believes in the magical invisible sky pixie

All makes sense, to be honest! lol!!

Put all the top brains on planet Earth in one place and ask them to agree on something...…………………

The fact is that not one or all of them know where humans came from, what the universe is in fact their answers to this would be as factual as if you ask a down syndrome individual.

The sad thing is that you do not understand the words theoretical physics. Do you really think the krap in the cripples books are fact

This is why all you morons voted for Hillary

I think youre on a device invented by the folks youre mocking and meanwhile you dont even know how a basic telescope works and also believe in a magical sky fairy because youre susceptible(gullible) to religuous propaganda.

And i find it FFFFfffffFFFfFFucking hilarious!!! Keep bangin'

Dude the device I am on is not theoretical, like the forces pulling the computer generated matrix universe that your great professors now believe, except for the ones now claiming that there is a great big magnet filling in for the 85 percent of the universe they lost, and bye the way I built this machine, my son builds them too.

Yawn, play on little one

The device youre on was created by your betters...that know and understand how to use a telescope, dunce

and youre an ass clown screaming for baby sky jesus on the internet...competing for intelligence with 2nd graders in your area

 

[Frannie]

You keep avoiding the question. Why is that?

It's very simple. Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

Frannie... telling the top brains on our literal planet that brought us cell phones, sattellites, aviation technology, GPS, the cures for thousands of previously deadly diseases...

that they're making shit up...

And frannie...proves she doesnt even know what 2nd graders know about telescopes...believes in the magical invisible sky pixie

All makes sense, to be honest! lol!!

Put all the top brains on planet Earth in one place and ask them to agree on something...…………………

The fact is that not one or all of them know where humans came from, what the universe is in fact their answers to this would be as factual as if you ask a down syndrome individual.

The sad thing is that you do not understand the words theoretical physics. Do you really think the krap in the cripples books are fact

This is why all you morons voted for Hillary

I think youre on a device invented by the folks youre mocking and meanwhile you dont even know how a basic telescope works and also believe in a magical sky fairy because youre susceptible(gullible) to religuous propaganda.

And i find it FFFFfffffFFFfFFucking hilarious!!! Keep bangin'

Dude the device I am on is not theoretical, like the forces pulling the computer generated matrix universe that your great professors now believe, except for the ones now claiming that there is a great big magnet filling in for the 85 percent of the universe they lost, and bye the way I built this machine, my son builds them too.

Yawn, play on little one

The device youre on was created by your betters...that know and understand how to use a telescope, dunce

and youre an ass clown screaming for baby sky jesus on the internet...competing for intelligence with 2nd graders in your area

Actually I probably own many of the companies that made the parts in your machine there.

Really

CIAO

What kind of telescope would that be, I presume you know that there are other types besides optical. So little one you will need to specify what type of telescope you are referring too.

These are non optical scopes

• Atmospheric Cherenkov telescope used to detect gamma rays

• Infrared telescope

• Radio telescope

• Submillimeter telescope

• Ultraviolet telescope (see also Ultraviolet astronomy)

• X-ray telescope (see also X-ray astronomy)
  • Wolter telescope

Here are a few more

Refracting telescopes (Dioptrics)

• Achromatic telescope
  • dialytic refractor
• Apochromatic
• Binoculars
  • Opera glasses
• Copyscope
• Galileoscope
• Monocular
• Non-achromatic
  • Galilean telescope
  • Keplerian Telescope
    • Aerial telescope
• Superachromat
• Varifocal gas-lens telescope
• Baden-Powell's unilens

Reflecting telescopes (Catoptrics)

• Cassegrain telescope
  • Dall–Kirkham telescope
  • Nasmyth telescope
  • Ritchey–Chrétien telescope
• Gregorian telescope
• Herrig telescope
• Herschelian telescope
• Large liquid mirror telescope
• Newtonian telescope
  • Dobsonian telescope
• Pfund telescope
• Schiefspiegler telescope
• Stevick–Paul telescope
• Three-mirror anastigmat
• Toroidal reflector / Yolo telescope
• Wolter telescope

Catadioptric telescopes (Catadioptrics)

• Argunov–Cassegrain telescope
• Catadioptric dialytes
• Klevtsov–Cassegrain telescope
• Lurie–Houghton telescope
• Maksutov telescope
  • Maksutov camera
  • Maksutov–Cassegrain telescope
    • Rutten Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
    • Sub-aperture corrector Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
  • Maksutov Newtonian telescope
• Modified Dall–Kirkham telescope
• Schmidt camera
  • Baker-Nunn camera
  • Baker-Schmidt camera
  • Lensless Schmidt telescope
  • Mersenne-Schmidt camera
  • Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope
    • ACF Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope (Meade Instruments)
  • Schmidt–Newton telescope
  • Schmidt-Väisälä camera

Now do be my guest kid, tell us how they all work and which one you use to focus on the only woman you have ever seen naked.

 

[G.T.]

Frannie... telling the top brains on our literal planet that brought us cell phones, sattellites, aviation technology, GPS, the cures for thousands of previously deadly diseases...

that they're making shit up...

And frannie...proves she doesnt even know what 2nd graders know about telescopes...believes in the magical invisible sky pixie

All makes sense, to be honest! lol!!

Put all the top brains on planet Earth in one place and ask them to agree on something...…………………

The fact is that not one or all of them know where humans came from, what the universe is in fact their answers to this would be as factual as if you ask a down syndrome individual.

The sad thing is that you do not understand the words theoretical physics. Do you really think the krap in the cripples books are fact

This is why all you morons voted for Hillary

I think youre on a device invented by the folks youre mocking and meanwhile you dont even know how a basic telescope works and also believe in a magical sky fairy because youre susceptible(gullible) to religuous propaganda.

And i find it FFFFfffffFFFfFFucking hilarious!!! Keep bangin'

Dude the device I am on is not theoretical, like the forces pulling the computer generated matrix universe that your great professors now believe, except for the ones now claiming that there is a great big magnet filling in for the 85 percent of the universe they lost, and bye the way I built this machine, my son builds them too.

Yawn, play on little one

The device youre on was created by your betters...that know and understand how to use a telescope, dunce

and youre an ass clown screaming for baby sky jesus on the internet...competing for intelligence with 2nd graders in your area

Actually I probably own many of the companies that made the parts in your machine there.

Really

CIAO

What kind of telescope would that be, I presume you know that there are other types besides optical. So little one you will need to specify what type of telescope you are referring too.

These are non optical scopes

• Atmospheric Cherenkov telescope used to detect gamma rays

• Infrared telescope

• Radio telescope

• Submillimeter telescope

• Ultraviolet telescope (see also Ultraviolet astronomy)

• X-ray telescope (see also X-ray astronomy)
  • Wolter telescope

Here are a few more

Refracting telescopes (Dioptrics)

• Achromatic telescope
  • dialytic refractor
• Apochromatic
• Binoculars
  • Opera glasses
• Copyscope
• Galileoscope
• Monocular
• Non-achromatic
  • Galilean telescope
  • Keplerian Telescope
    • Aerial telescope
• Superachromat
• Varifocal gas-lens telescope
• Baden-Powell's unilens

Reflecting telescopes (Catoptrics)

• Cassegrain telescope
  • Dall–Kirkham telescope
  • Nasmyth telescope
  • Ritchey–Chrétien telescope
• Gregorian telescope
• Herrig telescope
• Herschelian telescope
• Large liquid mirror telescope
• Newtonian telescope
  • Dobsonian telescope
• Pfund telescope
• Schiefspiegler telescope
• Stevick–Paul telescope
• Three-mirror anastigmat
• Toroidal reflector / Yolo telescope
• Wolter telescope

Catadioptric telescopes (Catadioptrics)

• Argunov–Cassegrain telescope
• Catadioptric dialytes
• Klevtsov–Cassegrain telescope
• Lurie–Houghton telescope
• Maksutov telescope
  • Maksutov camera
  • Maksutov–Cassegrain telescope
    • Rutten Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
    • Sub-aperture corrector Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
  • Maksutov Newtonian telescope
• Modified Dall–Kirkham telescope
• Schmidt camera
  • Baker-Nunn camera
  • Baker-Schmidt camera
  • Lensless Schmidt telescope
  • Mersenne-Schmidt camera
  • Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope
    • ACF Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope (Meade Instruments)
  • Schmidt–Newton telescope
  • Schmidt-Väisälä camera

Now do be my guest kid, tell us how they all work and which one you use to focus on the only woman you have ever seen naked.

Easy, tiny tim. When they say that buying stocks gives you an ownership "stake," it doesnt mean you literally own the company, tiny tim

you already proved you dont know the simple functionality of a ffff


of a fff


i cant even say it


of a fucking telescope.



ask sky pixie jesus

 

[Frannie]

Put all the top brains on planet Earth in one place and ask them to agree on something...…………………

The fact is that not one or all of them know where humans came from, what the universe is in fact their answers to this would be as factual as if you ask a down syndrome individual.

The sad thing is that you do not understand the words theoretical physics. Do you really think the krap in the cripples books are fact

This is why all you morons voted for Hillary

I think youre on a device invented by the folks youre mocking and meanwhile you dont even know how a basic telescope works and also believe in a magical sky fairy because youre susceptible(gullible) to religuous propaganda.

And i find it FFFFfffffFFFfFFucking hilarious!!! Keep bangin'

Dude the device I am on is not theoretical, like the forces pulling the computer generated matrix universe that your great professors now believe, except for the ones now claiming that there is a great big magnet filling in for the 85 percent of the universe they lost, and bye the way I built this machine, my son builds them too.

Yawn, play on little one

The device youre on was created by your betters...that know and understand how to use a telescope, dunce

and youre an ass clown screaming for baby sky jesus on the internet...competing for intelligence with 2nd graders in your area

Actually I probably own many of the companies that made the parts in your machine there.

Really

CIAO

What kind of telescope would that be, I presume you know that there are other types besides optical. So little one you will need to specify what type of telescope you are referring too.

These are non optical scopes

• Atmospheric Cherenkov telescope used to detect gamma rays

• Infrared telescope

• Radio telescope

• Submillimeter telescope

• Ultraviolet telescope (see also Ultraviolet astronomy)

• X-ray telescope (see also X-ray astronomy)
  • Wolter telescope

Here are a few more

Refracting telescopes (Dioptrics)

• Achromatic telescope
  • dialytic refractor
• Apochromatic
• Binoculars
  • Opera glasses
• Copyscope
• Galileoscope
• Monocular
• Non-achromatic
  • Galilean telescope
  • Keplerian Telescope
    • Aerial telescope
• Superachromat
• Varifocal gas-lens telescope
• Baden-Powell's unilens

Reflecting telescopes (Catoptrics)

• Cassegrain telescope
  • Dall–Kirkham telescope
  • Nasmyth telescope
  • Ritchey–Chrétien telescope
• Gregorian telescope
• Herrig telescope
• Herschelian telescope
• Large liquid mirror telescope
• Newtonian telescope
  • Dobsonian telescope
• Pfund telescope
• Schiefspiegler telescope
• Stevick–Paul telescope
• Three-mirror anastigmat
• Toroidal reflector / Yolo telescope
• Wolter telescope

Catadioptric telescopes (Catadioptrics)

• Argunov–Cassegrain telescope
• Catadioptric dialytes
• Klevtsov–Cassegrain telescope
• Lurie–Houghton telescope
• Maksutov telescope
  • Maksutov camera
  • Maksutov–Cassegrain telescope
    • Rutten Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
    • Sub-aperture corrector Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
  • Maksutov Newtonian telescope
• Modified Dall–Kirkham telescope
• Schmidt camera
  • Baker-Nunn camera
  • Baker-Schmidt camera
  • Lensless Schmidt telescope
  • Mersenne-Schmidt camera
  • Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope
    • ACF Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope (Meade Instruments)
  • Schmidt–Newton telescope
  • Schmidt-Väisälä camera

Now do be my guest kid, tell us how they all work and which one you use to focus on the only woman you have ever seen naked.

Easy, tiny tim. When they say that buying stocks gives you an ownership "stake," it doesnt mean you literally own the company, tiny tim

you already proved you dont know the simple functionality of a ffff


of a fff


i cant even say it


of a fucking telescope.



ask sky pixie jesus

Tell my dividends that.

 

[G.T.]

I think youre on a device invented by the folks youre mocking and meanwhile you dont even know how a basic telescope works and also believe in a magical sky fairy because youre susceptible(gullible) to religuous propaganda.

And i find it FFFFfffffFFFfFFucking hilarious!!! Keep bangin'

Dude the device I am on is not theoretical, like the forces pulling the computer generated matrix universe that your great professors now believe, except for the ones now claiming that there is a great big magnet filling in for the 85 percent of the universe they lost, and bye the way I built this machine, my son builds them too.

Yawn, play on little one

The device youre on was created by your betters...that know and understand how to use a telescope, dunce

and youre an ass clown screaming for baby sky jesus on the internet...competing for intelligence with 2nd graders in your area

Actually I probably own many of the companies that made the parts in your machine there.

Really

CIAO

What kind of telescope would that be, I presume you know that there are other types besides optical. So little one you will need to specify what type of telescope you are referring too.

These are non optical scopes

• Atmospheric Cherenkov telescope used to detect gamma rays

• Infrared telescope

• Radio telescope

• Submillimeter telescope

• Ultraviolet telescope (see also Ultraviolet astronomy)

• X-ray telescope (see also X-ray astronomy)
  • Wolter telescope

Here are a few more

Refracting telescopes (Dioptrics)

• Achromatic telescope
  • dialytic refractor
• Apochromatic
• Binoculars
  • Opera glasses
• Copyscope
• Galileoscope
• Monocular
• Non-achromatic
  • Galilean telescope
  • Keplerian Telescope
    • Aerial telescope
• Superachromat
• Varifocal gas-lens telescope
• Baden-Powell's unilens

Reflecting telescopes (Catoptrics)

• Cassegrain telescope
  • Dall–Kirkham telescope
  • Nasmyth telescope
  • Ritchey–Chrétien telescope
• Gregorian telescope
• Herrig telescope
• Herschelian telescope
• Large liquid mirror telescope
• Newtonian telescope
  • Dobsonian telescope
• Pfund telescope
• Schiefspiegler telescope
• Stevick–Paul telescope
• Three-mirror anastigmat
• Toroidal reflector / Yolo telescope
• Wolter telescope

Catadioptric telescopes (Catadioptrics)

• Argunov–Cassegrain telescope
• Catadioptric dialytes
• Klevtsov–Cassegrain telescope
• Lurie–Houghton telescope
• Maksutov telescope
  • Maksutov camera
  • Maksutov–Cassegrain telescope
    • Rutten Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
    • Sub-aperture corrector Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
  • Maksutov Newtonian telescope
• Modified Dall–Kirkham telescope
• Schmidt camera
  • Baker-Nunn camera
  • Baker-Schmidt camera
  • Lensless Schmidt telescope
  • Mersenne-Schmidt camera
  • Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope
    • ACF Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope (Meade Instruments)
  • Schmidt–Newton telescope
  • Schmidt-Väisälä camera

Now do be my guest kid, tell us how they all work and which one you use to focus on the only woman you have ever seen naked.

Easy, tiny tim. When they say that buying stocks gives you an ownership "stake," it doesnt mean you literally own the company, tiny tim

you already proved you dont know the simple functionality of a ffff


of a fff


i cant even say it


of a fucking telescope.



ask sky pixie jesus

Tell my dividends that.

Saying stuff on the internet doesnt make it true, corky. Thats why the device youre using actually works...meanwhile your "stocks" are as real as Nessie and your understanding of telescopes

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Tell my dividends that.

Do you keep them where you keep your imaginary baby Jesus?

 

[Frannie]

Dude the device I am on is not theoretical, like the forces pulling the computer generated matrix universe that your great professors now believe, except for the ones now claiming that there is a great big magnet filling in for the 85 percent of the universe they lost, and bye the way I built this machine, my son builds them too.

Yawn, play on little one

The device youre on was created by your betters...that know and understand how to use a telescope, dunce

and youre an ass clown screaming for baby sky jesus on the internet...competing for intelligence with 2nd graders in your area

Actually I probably own many of the companies that made the parts in your machine there.

Really

CIAO

What kind of telescope would that be, I presume you know that there are other types besides optical. So little one you will need to specify what type of telescope you are referring too.

These are non optical scopes

• Atmospheric Cherenkov telescope used to detect gamma rays

• Infrared telescope

• Radio telescope

• Submillimeter telescope

• Ultraviolet telescope (see also Ultraviolet astronomy)

• X-ray telescope (see also X-ray astronomy)
  • Wolter telescope

Here are a few more

Refracting telescopes (Dioptrics)

• Achromatic telescope
  • dialytic refractor
• Apochromatic
• Binoculars
  • Opera glasses
• Copyscope
• Galileoscope
• Monocular
• Non-achromatic
  • Galilean telescope
  • Keplerian Telescope
    • Aerial telescope
• Superachromat
• Varifocal gas-lens telescope
• Baden-Powell's unilens

Reflecting telescopes (Catoptrics)

• Cassegrain telescope
  • Dall–Kirkham telescope
  • Nasmyth telescope
  • Ritchey–Chrétien telescope
• Gregorian telescope
• Herrig telescope
• Herschelian telescope
• Large liquid mirror telescope
• Newtonian telescope
  • Dobsonian telescope
• Pfund telescope
• Schiefspiegler telescope
• Stevick–Paul telescope
• Three-mirror anastigmat
• Toroidal reflector / Yolo telescope
• Wolter telescope

Catadioptric telescopes (Catadioptrics)

• Argunov–Cassegrain telescope
• Catadioptric dialytes
• Klevtsov–Cassegrain telescope
• Lurie–Houghton telescope
• Maksutov telescope
  • Maksutov camera
  • Maksutov–Cassegrain telescope
    • Rutten Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
    • Sub-aperture corrector Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
  • Maksutov Newtonian telescope
• Modified Dall–Kirkham telescope
• Schmidt camera
  • Baker-Nunn camera
  • Baker-Schmidt camera
  • Lensless Schmidt telescope
  • Mersenne-Schmidt camera
  • Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope
    • ACF Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope (Meade Instruments)
  • Schmidt–Newton telescope
  • Schmidt-Väisälä camera

Now do be my guest kid, tell us how they all work and which one you use to focus on the only woman you have ever seen naked.

Easy, tiny tim. When they say that buying stocks gives you an ownership "stake," it doesnt mean you literally own the company, tiny tim

you already proved you dont know the simple functionality of a ffff


of a fff


i cant even say it


of a fucking telescope.



ask sky pixie jesus

Tell my dividends that.

Saying stuff on the internet doesnt make it true, corky. Thats why the device youre using actually works...meanwhile your "stocks" are as real as Nessie and your understanding of telescopes

True but I never lie, no need, the truth is way more fun

I must admit I am not really entirely happy with Raytheon this year, but Estee Lauder is hoppin

Estee Lauder Cos. Cl A

You deny as much as you need

CIAO

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

G.T.

What this pathetic, lying little troll did was do a google search for stocks to have something to say.

He just cribbed his last post from this article (which, no doubt, just happened to turn up in his desperate little google search):

In Search For Growth? – The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL), Raytheon Company (RTN) | Techno Recorder

 

[Frannie]

Tell my dividends that.

Do you keep them where you keep your imaginary baby Jesus?

Nope the dividends are in one or more of any number of brokerage accounts

 

[G.T.]

Tell my dividends that.

Do you keep them where you keep your imaginary baby Jesus?

Nope the dividends are in one or more of any number of brokerage accounts

Your autism isnt very speshull

 

[Frannie]

Tell my dividends that.

Do you keep them where you keep your imaginary baby Jesus?

Nope the dividends are in one or more of any number of brokerage accounts

Your autism isnt very speshull

Gave up on the science arguments I see...……………………..

 

[hadit]

So where do you think all the matter is hiding?

Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

Kid the reason for this new theory is that no dark matter is needed, the attractive force is coming from outside the universe. Please try to keep up, I know it's hard but you might just get left back or sent to peel potatoes.

You keep looking thru the telescope, the market dropped today and new buys just opened up.

Really, funny how all the astronomers are still paying off their PHD and Bill Gates is a dropout

Still don't think telescopes can track objects in the sky?

The funny thing is that fools like you see this and know that

God is not real
The age of the universe (changes yearly by a billion years or so)
It's all a computer simulation because
85 percent of it is missing
unless the big magnets outside this universe are pulling stuff

Yo, if you see something and do not know what it is, then take a photo of it...……….

Drumroll, you still do not know what it is but at least you can show the photo to other people who also will not know what it is.

You keep avoiding the question. Why is that?

It's very simple. Have you figured out how telescopes work yet?

What kind of telescope would that be, I presume you know that there are other types besides optical. So little one you will need to specify what type of telescope you are referring too.

These are non optical scopes

• Atmospheric Cherenkov telescope used to detect gamma rays

• Infrared telescope

• Radio telescope

• Submillimeter telescope

• Ultraviolet telescope (see also Ultraviolet astronomy)

• X-ray telescope (see also X-ray astronomy)
  • Wolter telescope

Here are a few more

Refracting telescopes (Dioptrics)

• Achromatic telescope
  • dialytic refractor
• Apochromatic
• Binoculars
  • Opera glasses
• Copyscope
• Galileoscope
• Monocular
• Non-achromatic
  • Galilean telescope
  • Keplerian Telescope
    • Aerial telescope
• Superachromat
• Varifocal gas-lens telescope
• Baden-Powell's unilens

Reflecting telescopes (Catoptrics)

• Cassegrain telescope
  • Dall–Kirkham telescope
  • Nasmyth telescope
  • Ritchey–Chrétien telescope
• Gregorian telescope
• Herrig telescope
• Herschelian telescope
• Large liquid mirror telescope
• Newtonian telescope
  • Dobsonian telescope
• Pfund telescope
• Schiefspiegler telescope
• Stevick–Paul telescope
• Three-mirror anastigmat
• Toroidal reflector / Yolo telescope
• Wolter telescope

Catadioptric telescopes (Catadioptrics)

• Argunov–Cassegrain telescope
• Catadioptric dialytes
• Klevtsov–Cassegrain telescope
• Lurie–Houghton telescope
• Maksutov telescope
  • Maksutov camera
  • Maksutov–Cassegrain telescope
    • Rutten Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
    • Sub-aperture corrector Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope
  • Maksutov Newtonian telescope
• Modified Dall–Kirkham telescope
• Schmidt camera
  • Baker-Nunn camera
  • Baker-Schmidt camera
  • Lensless Schmidt telescope
  • Mersenne-Schmidt camera
  • Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope
    • ACF Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope (Meade Instruments)
  • Schmidt–Newton telescope
  • Schmidt-Väisälä camera

Now do be my guest kid, tell us how they all work and which one you use to focus on the only woman you have ever seen naked.

CIAO

It's very simple, every telescope gathers electromagnetic radiation and focuses it onto a recording medium. Radio telescopes have to be bigger because they focus much longer wavelengths. Infrared telescopes are useful for observing distant objects that are traveling so rapidly away from us that the light they admitted has been red-shifted out of the visible spectrum.

Now, when are you going to admit that you researched motor drives and how they allow telescopes to focus on an object as the earth rotates?

As for naked women, you brought them up, not me. Obviously, they are on your mind. How long ago did you first begin to notice that they are attractive? Don't feel nervous about it, it's totally natural, and they'll probably have a special class on it at school.