The warmers need to explain the Arctic Circle's ice pattern, and how Co2 is responsible...

[CrusaderFrank]

It both lags it and leads it. It's a forcing and a feedback.

Your inability to grasp such basic things only reflects badly on you.

You're lying again. It's reads right to left like Hebrew. Show us CO2 "leading" temperature

 

[Dagosa]

LINK???

LOL!!!

The Co2 fraud cannot explain a map of the Arctic. THAT is the IDIOCY of the FRAUD....

Wow, a map of the Arctic, that explains nearly everything.m

 

[EMH]

Wow, a map of the Arctic, that explains nearly everything.m

It actually does.

There is a point around 600 miles to a pole where annual snowfall ceases to fully melt, and then it starts to stack...

Everything on Earth 600 miles to a pole is buried under ice... hmmmm.....

 

[mamooth]

Cannot even explain a map of the Arctic...

I have no idea why this pisshead thinks a map of the Arctic somehow disproves AGW theory.

He's the only one here who is shrieking that it all has something to do with CO2, and nobody knows why. Everyone else keeps pointing out to him that it has nothing to do with CO2.

 

[mamooth]

You're lying again. It's reads right to left like Hebrew. Show us CO2 "leading" temperature

Sure.

Look at a spot. You see CO2 going up.

After it does, temp goes up.

Hence, CO2 leads temp. Yes, temp leads CO2 as well, but that doesn't stop CO2 from leading temp.

You're not very bright. That's an observation, and not a question. Your cult brain is locked into "derp temp leading CO2 precludes CO2 leading temp!" stupidity. You can't grasp that both of them lead the other one. CO2 is both a forcing and a feedback.

 

[EMH]

I have no idea why this pisshead thinks a map of the Arctic somehow disproves AGW theory.

He's the only one here who is shrieking that it all has something to do with CO2, and nobody knows why. Everyone else keeps pointing out to him that it has nothing to do with CO2.

Actually it completely eliminates Co2 and atmosphere, because both were constant as Greenland froze while North America thawed...

As for Greenland vs. Alaska today, that is the 600 miles to a pole issue. Greenland is within that 600 miles and hence is in ice age and Alaska is not.

EMH over and over claims here that Co2 does nothing, and proves it... and hence one of your strategies is to lie about that, which apparently gets SUBS elsewhere on USMB to come here and expose their SUB 5 IQ by accusing EMH of being a Global Warmer.

EMH is about land near the poles.... not Co2.... LOL!!!

 

[Dagosa]

It actually does.

There is a point around 600 miles to a pole where annual snowfall ceases to fully melt, and then it starts to stack...

Everything on Earth 600 miles to a pole is buried under ice... hmmmm.....

You must be building a snow man. That’s all you have ?

 

[Dagosa]

Actually it completely eliminates Co2 and atmosphere, because both were constant as Greenland froze while North America thawed...

As for Greenland vs. Alaska today, that is the 600 miles to a pole issue. Greenland is within that 600 miles and hence is in ice age and Alaska is not.

EMH over and over claims here that Co2 does nothing, and proves it... and hence one of your strategies is to lie about that, which apparently gets SUBS elsewhere on USMB to come here and expose their SUB 5 IQ by accusing EMH of being a Global Warmer.

EMH is about land near the poles.... not Co2.... LOL!!!

Babble. Everything you post is a lie, every reference you make proves you’rev FOS, you can’t even read your own references.

 

[EMH]

You must be building a snow man. That’s all you have ?

Well....

Antarctica is 90% of Earth Ice
Greenland is 7% of Earth Ice
Ellesmere Island (Canada) is 0.3% of Earth ice

The rest is on mountains and sea ice...

So, how much ice would Earth have if there was NO LAND within 600 miles of a pole???

 

[mamooth]

Actually it completely eliminates Co2 and atmosphere, because both were constant as Greenland froze while North America thawed...

That makes no sense at all.

First, CO2 wasn't constant.

Second, logic failure. Saying that CO2 wasn't the driving force behind one thing does not eliminate CO2 as the driving force behind other things.

As for Greenland vs. Alaska today, that is the 600 miles to a pole issue. Greenland is within that 600 miles and hence is in ice age and Alaska is not.

But southern Greenland is glaciated, while northern Alaska is not. And northern Alaska is much closer to the pole. So, your theory is disproved.

EMH over and over claims here that Co2 does nothing, and proves it... and hence one of your strategies is to lie about that, which apparently gets SUBS elsewhere on USMB to come here and expose their SUB 5 IQ by accusing EMH of being a Global Warmer.

"SUBS"? We don't know the special lingo of your weird cult, so you have to explain.

EMH is about land near the poles.... not Co2.... LOL!!!

You keep speaking of yourself in the third person. That's not a good sign.

 

[Dagosa]

Well....

Antarctica is 90% of Earth Ice
Greenland is 7% of Earth Ice
Ellesmere Island (Canada) is 0.3% of Earth ice

The rest is on mountains and sea ice...

So, how much ice would Earth have if there was NO LAND within 600 miles of a pole???

Earth ice, thats short hand for snow ice. Direct your stupid question to someone who cares.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Sure.

Look at a spot. You see CO2 going up.

After it does, temp goes up.

Hence, CO2 leads temp. Yes, temp leads CO2 as well, but that doesn't stop CO2 from leading temp.

You're not very bright. That's an observation, and not a question. Your cult brain is locked into "derp temp leading CO2 precludes CO2 leading temp!" stupidity. You can't grasp that both of them lead the other one. CO2 is both a forcing and a feedback.

You’re confused. The chart shows temperatures LEADING CO2 both increasing AND decreasing for 450,000 consecutive years

 

[Dagosa]

Well....

Antarctica is 90% of Earth Ice
Greenland is 7% of Earth Ice
Ellesmere Island (Canada) is 0.3% of Earth ice

The rest is on mountains and sea ice...

So, how much ice would Earth have if there was NO LAND within 600 miles of a pole???

Ha ha. Snow ice build up is consistent with a warming trend from CO2 as warmer air holds more moisture and produces higher snow fall rates idiot. Every time you open your mouth another nail goes into the coffin of stupid deniers.

 

[EMH]

First, CO2 wasn't constant.

LOL!!

The Mossad is arguing that atmospheric Co2 over North America was not the same as Co2 over Greenland...

Not sane...

Not a rational or intelligent person

 

[EMH]

But southern Greenland is glaciated, while northern Alaska is not. And northern Alaska is much closer to the pole.

but not 600 miles to a pole. That is the difference between ice age (Greenland) and not ice age (Alaska) - land being within 600 miles of a pole, which will result in glaciers pushed all the way outside of the polar circle given continuous land to do so (Greenland, North America 50 million years ago, Antarctica)

Nice try.

 

[EMH]

You’re confused. The chart shows temperatures LEADING CO2 both increasing AND decreasing for 450,000 consecutive years

You are not dealing with a rational person intent on real debate. She/he knows Co2 is fraud. She is a sick person and she lies and gets busted lying and keeps coming back for more...

 

[mamooth]

but not 600 miles to a pole. That is the difference between ice age (Greenland) and not ice age (Alaska) - land being within 600 miles of a pole, which will result in glaciers pushed all the way outside of the polar circle given continuous land to do so (Greenland, North America 50 million years ago, Antarctica)

Say what?

That made no sense at all. Has nobody told you that before?

 

[EMH]

Say what?

That made no sense at all. Has nobody told you that before?

When they cannot refute one word of it, this is the Mossad way of shouting it down...

Make no mistake, Zionist Fascism is behind the Co2 fraud, always has been...

 

[Dagosa]

You are not dealing with a rational person intent on real debate. She/he knows Co2 is fraud. She is a sick person and she lies and gets busted lying and keeps coming back for more...

You’re the sick person. What kind of a world do you live in when you’re delusional.

 

[Dagosa]

Zionist Fascism is behind the Co2 fraud,

So Mitch McConnell is a Zionist fascist ?
How about the Pope ?