- Dec 29, 2008
- 36,335
- 19,222
- 1,905
Hitler and Kim Jong Un are not the same person. Suicidal leaders are rare, and if Hitler was offered a surrender agreement that involved him staying in power, he would have taken it.The stand off has existed because no president has had the balls to go nuclear (rightly so). Nukes were never going to be an option for Obama and NK knew that. Trump is a different story though. If Trump says "we have decided to destroy NK with nukes if they retaliate", they have to take the threat seriously. So, is KJU suicidal? I dont think so....but if you were KJU, would you retaliate if you knew it would mean the end of your country and your own life?I think the solution is to openly tell them that we are going to hit their nuclear facilities. Id tell them we have no plans for an invasion or regime change, but if they retaliate in any way, we will be forced to burn down the entirety of NK with nuclear strikes. Kim Jong Un wont like being bitch slapped like that, but im guessing he will prefer that over nuclear destruction.
And they will play the same game and say they will not strike unless we strike first
Hitting their nuclear sites is hitting first
If you were DJT would you preemptively strike if you knew it would result in a counterattack against Seoul ?
That is why it is a standoff
Do you think people asked themselves the same question about Hitler back in the World War II?
As it turns out, he was!
Last edited: