Dishonest people can't make me cry.Keep posting bad physics, I'm gonna keep making you cry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Dishonest people can't make me cry.Keep posting bad physics, I'm gonna keep making you cry.
Dishonest people can't make me cry.
You need to see it that way.Looks like your pointing out your bad physics makes you cry.
You need to see it that way.
That you have been trolling for over a year? Yes, they see that.Everyone can see it.
That you have been trolling for over a year? Yes, they see that.
Your opposition to my argument that widespread use of solar power is the best way to usher in the next ice age says otherwise. You've been arguing there is no incremental cooling effect from using solar, ya greenie kuck.
The cooling has been going on for 50 million years; off and on but predominantly on.The problem with this argument is that we're in a period of global cooling already ... when we use 1,000 year time increments ... we can say that tidally locking the Moon with drive us into an ice age if we want, and given time, we'd be right ... the Moon does cause ice on Earth ... great work !!! ...
615 BTUs per sq yard, 10,000 sq miles of solar panel ... what's our change in temperature? ...
The net has been measured at six farms as incrementally cooler. You already conceded it. You are arguing with yourself.They can see that lower albedo warms the planet, that it won't push us into the next glacial cycle.
The net has been measured at six farms as incrementally cooler. You already conceded it. You are arguing with yourself.
The cooling has been going on for 50 million years; off and on but predominantly on.
fallacy!If you knew the fallicy
fallacy!
It's not mutually exclusive. So, no. I don't know the fallacy of my argument. What's the fallacy of my argument?If you knew the fallicy of your argument ... why did you post it? ... the fallacious argument that is, not the fallaciousnessing ability ...
I'm happy enough with you conceding the incremental cooler temperatures measured at six solar farms were caused by converting photons into electricity. Although it's not like you had a choice.The net has been measured at six farms as incrementally cooler.
Why do you feel the farm measurements are the net measurements?
You already conceded that using the electricity generates waste heat.
At full output, there would be no albedo ... the panel is receiving the full 1,360 cosine (latitude - 23º) W/m^2 ... during maximum heat island effect ... we use 30% albedo as an average value when calculating climate effects because that includes clouds ... and clouds are absent when we're at peak production ...
How much added heat depends on what we do with the energy ... if we smelt iron with it, then that energy is tied up in the metal, being slowly released as it oxidies back into rust ... when we input energy, we can violate the 3rd Law, and bring more order to our part of the universe ... however, I don't think we're measuring temperature close enough to read this ...
Don't be a fool, install pylons first good chance you get ... [ka'ching] ... lots and lots of future home buyers will pay extra for that feature ...
I'm happy enough with you conceding the incremental cooler temperatures measured at six solar farms were caused by converting photons into electricity. Although it's not like you had a choice.
It's not mutually exclusive. So, no. I don't know the fallacy of my argument. What's the fallacy of my argument?
The thermal energy used to smelt iron ALL escapes to its surroundings as the iron cools to ambient temperature. None of it is tied up in the metal. And I suspect you meant to say you could violate the 2nd law.
The albedo is never zero either, plus the usual gratuitous abuse of "we" and "we're".. but it's thermodynamics! so apparently anything goes so long as one states it arrogantly enough. Not providing sources means all is well established fact, doncha know? Beyond question. Bzzzt, zip it!The thermal energy used to smelt iron ALL escapes to its surroundings as the iron cools to ambient temperature. None of it is tied up in the metal. And I suspect you meant to say you could violate the 2nd law.