The Ultimate Blasphemy The Queen James Bible

[Indeependent]

Yeah........that's why YOU DID NOT READ IT. It was not worthy of a retort. Must be a liberal.

I read it and, man, it is boring!

 

[Clyde 154]

Boy did you pick the wrong person to preach at.

What? No free speech? No Bill of Rights. I defy anyone to find anything presented to be a falsehood as based upon the actual content of the Holy Scriptures. As we used to say, "They can kill us but they can't eat ya......" If it comes to serving man or God, I chose God, everytime.

 

[occupied]

What? No free speech? No Bill of Rights. I defy anyone to find anything presented to be a falsehood as based upon the actual content of the Holy Scriptures. As we used to say, "They can kill us but they can't eat ya......" If it comes to serving man or God, I chose God, everytime.

Whatever, be a Christian, don't be annoying.

 

[BreezeWood]

In 1560 the version of the Bible weren't actual versions. They were translations. There werectranslations into Greek, Latin and Hebrew. The Old and New Testaments were in different languages. The Bible that preceded the King James Version was the Geneva Bible. It was a Protestant translation in opposition to Catholic Queen Mary. It was never hidden.



King James wrote no version of the Bible. He commissioned 47 scholars to translate the original texts into English. The KJV is the most accurate translation of the Bible ever made.

KJV is the most accurate translation of the Bible ever made.

so reassuring -

and the original - c bible - was "compiled" 400 years after the 1st century events, known as - the state religion of the roman empire ... even more reason for optimism.

then there's the 1560 saga of translations - and a queen mary bible the predecessor to the king james bible.

oh, and not one word written by the itinerant himself for verification for anything written about them in their documents than by chance whispers from heaven only they could hear.

... the holy bible.

 

[JohnDB]

so reassuring -

and the original - c bible - was "compiled" 400 years after the 1st century events, known as - the state religion of the roman empire ... even more reason for optimism.

then there's the 1560 saga of translations - and a queen mary bible the predecessor to the king james bible.

oh, and not one word written by the itinerant himself for verification for anything written about them in their documents than by chance whispers from heaven only they could hear.

... the holy bible.

Nope...
They had a fairly complete bible with the exclusion of the book of Jude by 90AD. (It came last because it hadn't been circulated widely)

Codex Sianiticus is the oldest complete Bible from roughly 300 AD.

It has a copy of the Septuagint and a fairly complete New Testament. (Including Revelation)

Of course Genesis and Revelations are both damaged but not beyond recognition and readability.

Try again.

Then also we have very accurate Masoretic texts and manuscripts that are exactly in line with the Dead Sea Scrolls and Alexandrian texts And Syriac manuscripts and a multitude of others.

This new variant translation which has been created in order to license sin is a joke. It's not going to be accepted or acceptable for anyone but a select few.

And that's what the homosexual community is really after anyway. Acceptance and promotion...but they aren't going to get it.

You can't mandate acceptance and promotion. You can't do it by threats and intimidation....look at how vaccine mandates didn't work!

Get a clue here.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

so reassuring -

and the original - c bible - was "compiled" 400 years after the 1st century events, known as - the state religion of the roman empire ... even more reason for optimism.

then there's the 1560 saga of translations - and a queen mary bible the predecessor to the king james bible.

oh, and not one word written by the itinerant himself for verification for anything written about them in their documents than by chance whispers from heaven only they could hear.

... the holy bible.

There is no Queen Mary Bible and never was.

 

[BreezeWood]

Nope...
They had a fairly complete bible with the exclusion of the book of Jude by 90AD. (It came last because it hadn't been circulated widely)

Codex Sianiticus is the oldest complete Bible from roughly 300 AD.

It has a copy of the Septuagint and a fairly complete New Testament. (Including Revelation)

Of course Genesis and Revelations are both damaged but not beyond recognition and readability.

Try again.

Then also we have very accurate Masoretic texts and manuscripts that are exactly in line with the Dead Sea Scrolls and Alexandrian texts And Syriac manuscripts and a multitude of others.

This new variant translation which has been created in order to license sin is a joke. It's not going to be accepted or acceptable for anyone but a select few.

And that's what the homosexual community is really after anyway. Acceptance and promotion...but they aren't going to get it.

You can't mandate acceptance and promotion. You can't do it by threats and intimidation....look at how vaccine mandates didn't work!

Get a clue here.

Get a clue here.

there are no original documents to verify any of your claims - what was it then that was cobbled together in the late 4th century. where is that document.

and where are the tablets the desert religions claim to be 10 commandments etched in the heavens - without those all three desert religions and their scriptures are proven to be forgeries strewn with fallacies for whatever their claims are for a religion.

 

[kjw47]

No,.. but you wouldn't be reading God's word either. This isn't a joke and God will NOT be mocked.

99.9% of all religion on earth has these teachers-2Corinthians 11:12-15

 

[JohnDB]

there are no original documents to verify any of your claims - what was it then that was cobbled together in the late 4th century. where is that document.

and where are the tablets the desert religions claim to be 10 commandments etched in the heavens - without those all three desert religions and their scriptures are proven to be forgeries strewn with fallacies for whatever their claims are for a religion.

You already know these answers....
Why fight? You know that you are on the losing side already.

 

[BreezeWood]

You already know these answers....
Why fight? You know that you are on the losing side already.

that's not a reply -

provide the tablets you claim are 10 commandments etched in the heavens or remove those forgeries from your documents including the other unsubstantiated fallacies claimed as miracles used to substantiate the falsely motivated underlining messaging that circumvents the liberation theology, self determination the religious itinerant in the 1st century was willing die for in correcting the existing judean interpretation of heavenly origins and spiritual pursuits.

 

[JohnDB]

that's not a reply -

provide the tablets you claim are 10 commandments etched in the heavens or remove those forgeries from your documents including the other unsubstantiated fallacies claimed as miracles used to substantiate the falsely motivated underlining messaging that circumvents the liberation theology, self determination the religious itinerant in the 1st century was willing die for in correcting the existing judean interpretation of heavenly origins and spiritual pursuits.

If you actually read the Bible instead of knocking it the explanation is contained within.

 

[BreezeWood]

If you actually read the Bible instead of knocking it the explanation is contained within.

that is not a qualified reply -

from the beginning page of the desert religion documents w/ forgeries and fallacies that are permitted throughout their publications precludes the need for their cursory review as to not repeat the same errors as their recorded history of persecution and victimization of the innocent has evolved throughout their existence to the present day.

as well as the corrections sought by the events of the 1st century liberation theology, self determination the 4th century - state religion of the roman empire - deliberately misconstrues for a religion of servitude than personal initiative.

Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

one example among countless many of 4th century c bible forgeries and fallacies written throughout their publication and the same for all three desert religions.

- provide the etched tablets from the heavens or remove the c bible (judean / islamic) forged 10 commandments from the c bible representing the 1st century events and include the expunged liberation theology, self determination the 1st century itinerant died for in reference to the religion of antiquity.

 

[Clyde 154]

that is not a qualified reply -

from the beginning page of the desert religion documents w/ forgeries and fallacies that are permitted throughout their publications precludes the need for their cursory review as to not repeat the same errors as their recorded history of persecution and victimization of the innocent has evolved throughout their existence to the present day.

as well as the corrections sought by the events of the 1st century liberation theology, self determination the 4th century - state religion of the roman empire - deliberately misconstrues for a religion of servitude than personal initiative.



one example among countless many of 4th century c bible forgeries and fallacies written throughout their publication and the same for all three desert religions.

- provide the etched tablets from the heavens or remove the c bible (judean / islamic) forged 10 commandments from the c bible representing the 1st century events and include the expunged liberation theology, self determination the 1st century itinerant died for in reference to the religion of antiquity.

All hat no cowboy. No evidence.......just subjective accusations. Poor ole Constentine ........he gets blamed for a great of progressive history that did not happen.

Constentine lived from A.D. 272 - A.D. 337. The King James Bible was not published until A.D. 1611. Yet you present a claim that Constentine and the Council of Nicea corrupted the modern translations of the Holy Scriptures such as the KJV?

The KJV was written entirely in English, a language that did not appear in history until around A.D. 449, with this early English Language totally unlike the English of the KJV era. So you think that Constentine called a Council together to write a new version of the Holy Scripture in a language that would not exist for another 1200 years?

Making a "claim/accusation" void of any evidence, logic or reason does not make facts....it makes a story. There are demonstrable historical records contained in sources outside the Bible that proves that manuscripts, partial manuscripts that predate Constentine and the council of Nicea. Among those sources that documented as being "hostile" to the religion of Christianity come from historians such Josephus a Jewish historian, with Jesus being directly referenced by such historians as Tacitus, Suetonius, Julius Africanus, and Pliny....all Roman historians.

There are numerous Christian writings many of which are dated back to the late 1st and early 2nd century.......hundreds of years before A.D. 325. All referencing the religion of Christianity and its records by Contemporary (of that time period) Christian historians. With the Bible itself considered a historical document, upon which our modern Calander is calibrated. There is more evidence for the existence of Jesus as being a historical person than many of the Greek writings that are accepted by our supposed 21st century scholars.

Proof? Why should anyone provide detailed proof with direct links to undisputed sources.......AD NAUSEAM? This information has been presented many times previous........simply to be ignored.

You have already demonstrated that NO EVIDENCE IS GOOD ENOUGH. You prefer fables while parroting information contrary to HISTORY ACTUAL.

See: 2 Tim. 4:3-4

 

[BreezeWood]

All hat no cowboy. No evidence.......just subjective accusations. Poor ole Constentine ........he gets blamed for a great of progressive history that did not happen.

Constentine lived from A.D. 272 - A.D. 337. The King James Bible was not published until A.D. 1611. Yet you present a claim that Constentine and the Council of Nicea corrupted the modern translations of the Holy Scriptures such as the KJV?

The KJV was written entirely in English, a language that did not appear in history until around A.D. 449, with this early English Language totally unlike the English of the KJV era. So you think that Constentine called a Council together to write a new version of the Holy Scripture in a language that would not exist for another 1200 years?

Making a "claim/accusation" void of any evidence, logic or reason does not make facts....it makes a story. There are demonstrable historical records contained in sources outside the Bible that proves that manuscripts, partial manuscripts that predate Constentine and the council of Nicea. Among those sources that documented as being "hostile" to the religion of Christianity come from historians such Josephus a Jewish historian, with Jesus being directly referenced by such historians as Tacitus, Suetonius, Julius Africanus, and Pliny....all Roman historians.

There are numerous Christian writings many of which are dated back to the late 1st and early 2nd century.......hundreds of years before A.D. 325. All referencing the religion of Christianity and its records by Contemporary (of that time period) Christian historians. With the Bible itself considered a historical document, upon which our modern Calander is calibrated. There is more evidence for the existence of Jesus as being a historical person than many of the Greek writings that are accepted by our supposed 21st century scholars.

Proof? Why should anyone provide detailed proof with direct links to undisputed sources.......AD NAUSEAM? This information has been presented many times previous........simply to be ignored.

You have already demonstrated that NO EVIDENCE IS GOOD ENOUGH. You prefer fables while parroting information contrary to HISTORY ACTUAL.

See: 2 Tim. 4:3-4

Proof? Why should anyone provide detailed proof with direct links to undisputed sources......

- provide the etched tablets from the heavens or remove the c bible (judean / islamic) forged 10 commandments from the c bible representing the 1st century events and include the expunged liberation theology, self determination the 1st century itinerant died for in reference to the religion of antiquity.

because you have no proof the etched tablets ever existed nor what may have been written on them and use their pretex to include in your book 10 commandments the c bible made up and are fallacies made to appear as something they are not.

as a microcosm for the entire publication - having nothing to do with the actual reason someone gave their life for the very purpose the publication deliberately disregards - the religion of antiquity, liberation theology, self determination.

 

[Clyde 154]

because you have no proof the etched tablets ever existed nor what may have been written on them and use their pretex to include in your book 10 commandments the c bible made up and are fallacies made to appear as something they are not.

as a microcosm for the entire publication - having nothing to do with the actual reason someone gave their life for the very purpose the publication deliberately disregards - the religion of antiquity, liberation theology, self determination.

As stated..........Do you have evidence that Constentine ever "relieved" (went to the bathroom)himself.....or do you base that fact upon the prima facie evidence of reality? Why ask someone to produce evidence of something when you have not presented any objective evidence to falsify the other 99.99% of the Bible? Its a liberal tactic.......demand someone prove a negative. Simply because something has not been found does not mean that it never existed. Its a tactic based upon FEAR and then a deflection (hopefully) away from the fact that you actually have no evidence.

Example: There has never been an example of a living T-REX ever produced........how do we know this animal ever lived? Its concluded by the Prima Facie evidence of a dead T-Rex. When you want to track an animal........or even a human, how do you do it? You simply look at the signs that are left behind, often you can conclude much about where something is going by observing where they have been.

Again......you have presented NO EVIDENCE to support your claims, but the burden of proof is always upon the one who is attempting to prosecute (accuse). The proof that all the righteous commandments contained on the Tablet are carried forward.......LITTERALY as commandments into the New Testament 1525 years after Moses delivered the commandments prove they were enforced. Its called PRIMA FACIE evidence and it stands as TRUTH until "YOU" the prosecutor attempting to refute that Prima Facie evidence presents Objective, Testable, Repeatable evidence that prove your position to be based upon Truth. Yet.....you do not, because you are incapable of producing that which does not exist. Thus your CIRCULAR ARGUMENT, repeating the same horseshit time after time without providing evidence other than the running of the mouth.

Look at the archives.........your argument has been debunked by a presentation of History Actual.........AD NAUSAEM....To the point that it requires "Dramamine" to read your Circular Arguments.

Is there any Liberal on this board who can actually debate without acting like a child?

 

[BreezeWood]

As stated..........Do you have evidence that Constentine ever "relieved" (went to the bathroom)himself.....or do you base that fact upon the prima facie evidence of reality? Why ask someone to produce evidence of something when you have not presented any objective evidence to falsify the other 99.99% of the Bible? Its a liberal tactic.......demand someone prove a negative. Simply because something has not been found does not mean that it never existed. Its a tactic based upon FEAR and then a deflection (hopefully) away from the fact that you actually have no evidence.

Example: There has never been an example of a living T-REX ever produced........how do we know this animal ever lived? Its concluded by the Prima Facie evidence of a dead T-Rex. When you want to track an animal........or even a human, how do you do it? You simply look at the signs that are left behind, often you can conclude much about where something is going by observing where they have been.

Again......you have presented NO EVIDENCE to support your claims, but the burden of proof is always upon the one who is attempting to prosecute (accuse). The proof that all the righteous commandments contained on the Tablet are carried forward.......LITTERALY as commandments into the New Testament 1525 years after Moses delivered the commandments prove they were enforced. Its called PRIMA FACIE evidence and it stands as TRUTH until "YOU" the prosecutor attempting to refute that Prima Facie evidence presents Objective, Testable, Repeatable evidence that prove your position to be based upon Truth. Yet.....you do not, because you are incapable of producing that which does not exist. Thus your CIRCULAR ARGUMENT, repeating the same horseshit time after time without providing evidence other than the running of the mouth.

Look at the archives.........your argument has been debunked by a presentation of History Actual.........AD NAUSAEM....To the point that it requires "Dramamine" to read your Circular Arguments.

Is there any Liberal on this board who can actually debate without acting like a child?

- provide the etched tablets from the heavens or remove the c bible (judean / islamic) forged 10 commandments from the c bible representing the 1st century events and include the expunged liberation theology, self determination the 1st century itinerant died for in reference to the religion of antiquity.

Again......you have presented NO EVIDENCE to support your claims,

the claims are relevant to the forgeries and fallacies throughout the c bible and all three desert religions.

provide the evidence for tablets etched in heaven or remove the forged 10 commandments - present in all 3 desert religion documents.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Who da thought? - A Woke Bible.
I read a description of what this thing is...and what it is... is kind of hilarious.
For instance in Leviticus, you would wonder how are they going to alter the verse If a man also lie with mankind as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death: their blood shall be upon them.
So what did they do? The make some wild claim that the verse is really talking only about while worshiping in a temple.
So they kept the verse unaltered, except they added ‘If a man also lie with mankind as he lieth with a woman in the temple Molach, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death: their blood shall be upon them.
So yeah... they took the liberty of saying it is only while you worship. You know, don't all people have sex while in church?

 

[Meriweather]

So yeah... they took the liberty of saying it is only while you worship. You know, don't all people have sex while in church?

To be fair, prayer is also worship, and prayer can be done in the home, in the bedroom. (Still, context seems to have been added, and we are warned against adding/subtracting to Biblical accounts.)

 

[iamwhatiseem]

To be fair, prayer is also worship, and prayer can be done in the home, in the bedroom. (Still, context seems to have been added, and we are warned against adding/subtracting to Biblical accounts.)

To be fair, that boat sunk ages ago. (changing Biblical texts)
The Bible is, without a doubt, the most edited/redacted book in the history of the world. The existence of it alone is only a collection of writings, most the author(s) unknown, where there is on knowledge whatsoever of their legitimacy

 

[Meriweather]

To be fair, that boat sunk ages ago. (changing Biblical texts)
The Bible is, without a doubt, the most edited/redacted book in the history of the world. The existence of it alone is only a collection of writings, most the author(s) unknown, where there is on knowledge whatsoever of their legitimacy

Other than Hebrew, much of the editing is due to changes that have evolved in our modern languages. One great example is our word 'cute' which now refers to looks. Originally, it referred to having a sharp mind (coming from the word acute). As English words evolved, editors would go back to the original Hebrew and select the modern English word which now corresponded more truly with the original Hebrew meaning.