iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,921
- 1,600
ok - now prove *i* said she was killing people. i'm only telling you your "argument" doesn't add up because of the premise behind the original statement can't be true in your own "snark".You have yet to prove along with anyone else that the Clinton's killed them or hired out the job...So you think that false allegations are a great diversion?do you ever try to connect the things you're saying to a singular point, or just lob out diversions and see what happens?Is it any worse than dying for any corporation?Are the clintons worth dying for? LolThey die all over the world, yet the Clinton's are now God pulling your ticket...People have been dying around the Clintons for years… Why is that? LOL
you know the implication is the clintons are having people killed. "dying for a corp" would only apply if the corp you mention is actively and secretly killing their employees.
swing and a snark miss.
i never said anything one way or the other about what i think about those rumors now have i? so don't pull me into this part when i have nothing to do with it.
stay on target, red leader.