LuvRPgrl
Senior Member
- Aug 11, 2005
- 3,163
- 206
- 48
who said it belongs in a science class?SpidermanTuba said:ID is a completely rational idea. It isn't testable, though, so it has no place in a science classroom.
The first form of life coming about by evolution is testable? Hmm, what, you think they will find a mini cam in some primordial soup that just happened to record it? You know, thats just as feasable as the idea that all those chemicals came together to form a single cell.
who said its the best I can do? I have had others, but you fail to see that it is regarded as a religion by many today.SpidermanTuba said:If the best you can do to defend your argument is simply to define science as being a sort of religion, you have surely run out of decent arguments..
SpidermanTuba said:Religion involves belief in a supernatural being or beings, or God or Gods. At a stretch, you might consider atheism a kind of religion. But science, which neither acknowledges nor denies the existance of a God or Gods, isn't even in the ball park.
Can you count to FOUR? OUCH!
re·li·gion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-ljn)
n.
1. Belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and governor of the universe.
2. A personal or institutionalized system grounded in such belief and worship.
The life or condition of a person in a religious order.
3. A set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a spiritual leader.
4. A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion.
SpidermanTuba said:You aren't a very practical person, are you? Does this mean that if one kid's parents want their children taught that the Earth is flat, another kid's parents want their children taught that ghosts and fairies and gnomes exist, and another kid's parents want their kids taught that Jews are evil people, its the school's responsibility to teach all the kids that?.
Your concerned about parents wanting their kids taught the earth is flat, about ghosts and faries and gnomes and Jews are evil, AND YOU THINK IM NOT PRACTICAL?
0 X 0 = 0SpidermanTuba said:Please show me your calculations..
SpidermanTuba said:What's with the irrelevant analogies? Clearly, complex molecules can spontaneously form, as we have observed this in a laboratory setting. So your general argument that
complex things cannot form out of simple things without intelligent intervention is just plain false..
How can it be false since I didnt make that claim.
Hmmm, water freezes, therefore a bunch of chemicals came together at one time to form a cell that suddenly had a mucous membrane, a nuclei telling that muceous membrane what chemicals to allow in and which not, golgi complex, rhimzones, etc, etc, etc. then to top it off, it "accidentally" for some weird reason "knew" to have some more chemicals float together within it at the EXACT SAME TIME, to form DNA, something so complex that not until recently was science able to use it to identify people, and something so complex that scientists spend their entire lifes studying it and dont really understand it. Yea, I bet you play lotto too.SpidermanTuba said:You can think up all the useless analogies you want, it remains a fact that some complex things can and DO form from simple things. Happens everytime water freezes for crying out loud..
SpidermanTuba said:Now show me your calculations for the probabiliy of single celled prokaryotes forming without intelligent intervention. You can't scientifically claim that 0 is the answer without showing the details of your calculations.
0 0 = 0
Hey, do you think dog shit tastes bad? have you ever tasted it? so, how do you know? There are some things that smell absolutely terrible, but actually taste good.