LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
Pale Rider, my post was sarcasm.
And.............there it is.
That was fun. You idiots were tripping over each other there for a while. To a person, too stupid to understand what you read.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pale Rider, my post was sarcasm.
It is called being responsible. If a person decides not to be responsible then the government will force them to be. So if you have a decent job and pay for your own benefits then you are responsible for paying for those who don't work as hard. If you don't want too tough, the government will force your compliance to what they say is your responsibility.
It is called being responsible. If a person decides not to be responsible then the government will force them to be. So if you have a decent job and pay for your own benefits then you are responsible for paying for those who don't work as hard. If you don't want too tough, the government will force your compliance to what they say is your responsibility.
No, that's the opposite of responsibility. What you're describing is obedience.
Responsibility is making your own decisions and dealing with the consequences. When government takes from you the freedom to decide your own actions, they also assume responsibility for the consequences of those actions. At that point, you're not exercising judgement or being responsible. You're just following orders.
You know what I would like to see which will never happen? I would like to see all who work for the IRS walk off the job in protest of this take away of American freedom. But it won't happen. The pencil necked geeks that were made fun of in High School will extract their revenge because now they have ultimate power. I don't know if I had anything but fear concerning the IRS but now I know I have zero respect.
It's time you moochers stop free loading off the rest of us who purchase health insurance.
Never said anything about poor people, just you moochers. Learn the difference.
It is called being responsible. If a person decides not to be responsible then the government will force them to be. So if you have a decent job and pay for your own benefits then you are responsible for paying for those who don't work as hard. If you don't want too tough, the government will force your compliance to what they say is your responsibility.
No, that's the opposite of responsibility. What you're describing is obedience.
Responsibility is making your own decisions and dealing with the consequences. When government takes from you the freedom to decide your own actions, they also assume responsibility for the consequences of those actions. At that point, you're not exercising judgement or being responsible. You're just following orders.
And.........another one.
My "side" has no problem admitting fact number 1. We scream that from the rooftops every day.
It's time you moochers stop free loading off the rest of us who purchase health insurance.
I really don't get all the seething resentment toward people in need. I suppose sometimes it's "their own damned fault", but if that's the way you feel, then don't help them out.
Never said anything about poor people, just you moochers. Learn the difference.
Yeah, let's talk about the difference. Someone going without insurance isn't hurting anyone else. What you're really complaining about is people who don't pay their medical bills. It's not the same thing.
Insurance is only one way to deal with health care expenses (and has, in fact, proven to be a spectacularly bad way). Pushing everyone into the same bad solution is just dumb.
My "side" has no problem admitting fact number 1. We scream that from the rooftops every day.
I don't recall the Democrats pushing significant tort reform, which will be one of the key components in reducing costs. Do you feel that would be on the table, if the Republicans gave in on some other key components?
.
Difference is my husband worked for those benefits unlike the left wing moochers. ASSWIPEThat is why most left wingers are assistance..
Says the woman with no job and being supported by a government paycheck. Ironic.
It's time you moochers stop free loading off the rest of us who purchase health insurance.
Nice. Will you take that exact same attitude with people on welfare, food stamps and drug usage? Because it is way beyond time for them to be responsible for their own lives and stop being a burden to the rest of of us. While we're at it, lets hold women who use abortion for birth control accountable by not having them foist their mistakes off on the rest of us.It is called being responsible. If a person decides not to be responsible then the government will force them to be. So if you have a decent job and pay for your own benefits then you are responsible for paying for those who don't work as hard. If you don't want too tough, the government will force your compliance to what they say is your responsibility.
Sound like a good plan for you? Or do you just want the suit with the Hypocrite sewn on the front?
Don't ya just love it when a pair of idiot nutters misunderstands one another?
.....edit.....
Make that a whole group of idiot nutters.
It's time you moochers stop free loading off the rest of us who purchase health insurance.
I really don't get all the seething resentment toward people in need. I suppose sometimes it's "their own damned fault", but if that's the way you feel, then don't help them out.
Never said anything about poor people, just you moochers. Learn the difference.
Yeah, let's talk about the difference. Someone going without insurance isn't hurting anyone else. What you're really complaining about is people who don't pay their medical bills. It's not the same thing.
Insurance is only one way to deal with health care expenses (and has, in fact, proven to be a spectacularly bad way). Pushing everyone into the same bad solution is just dumb.
My "side" has no problem admitting fact number 1. We scream that from the rooftops every day.
I don't recall the Democrats pushing significant tort reform, which will be one of the key components in reducing costs. Do you feel that would be on the table, if the Republicans gave in on some other key components?
.
As long as the ABA can lobby, tort reform won't happen. As long as the insurance industry can lobby, the ability to purchase insurance across state lines won't happen. As long as Big Pharma can lobby, prescription prices will never come down.
These 3 things would lower insurance costs significantly, without the massive new bureaucracy that is the ACA.
My "side" has no problem admitting fact number 1. We scream that from the rooftops every day.
I don't recall the Democrats pushing significant tort reform, which will be one of the key components in reducing costs. Do you feel that would be on the table, if the Republicans gave in on some other key components?
.
As long as the ABA can lobby, tort reform won't happen. As long as the insurance industry can lobby, the ability to purchase insurance across state lines won't happen. As long as Big Pharma can lobby, prescription prices will never come down.
These 3 things would lower insurance costs significantly, without the massive new bureaucracy that is the ACA.
It's time you moochers stop free loading off the rest of us who purchase health insurance.
Why are you being a low life with picking on the poor.
YOU STUPID FUCKS WERE SUPPOSED TO MAKE IT AFFORDABLE.
Instead premiums have increased along with the simple cost of an office visit.
You are one stupid son of a bitch.