- May 20, 2009
- 144,601
- 67,065
- 2,330
Green Shoots! Shovel Ready! It's baccccccccccccccccck.
Billions of jobs saved or created...coming to a theater near you!
Billions of jobs saved or created...coming to a theater near you!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Green Shoots! Shovel Ready! It's baccccccccccccccccck.
Billions of jobs saved or created...coming to a theater near you!
Proving or disproving that obama did or did not save jobs is closely akin to proving tax cuts creating jobs.
Proving or disproving that obama did or did not save jobs is closely akin to proving tax cuts creating jobs.
Except tax cuts actually work and we don't have to use the phony "jobs saved or created" metric
Proving or disproving that obama did or did not save jobs is closely akin to proving tax cuts creating jobs.
Except tax cuts actually work and we don't have to use the phony "jobs saved or created" metric
Ok prove tax cuts create jobs. And how many.
Reagan took office on the upswing of Carter's resession
the metric you people use to prove any potus good or bad for an economy constantly in flux is about as good as my saying you're not a patriot if you don't like Buck Owens
Reagan took office on the upswing of Carter's resession
the metric you people use to prove any potus good or bad for an economy constantly in flux is about as good as my saying you're not a patriot if you don't like Buck Owens
Please tell me you didn't type that with a straight face.Reagan took office on the upswing of Carter's resession
the metric you people use to prove any potus good or bad for an economy constantly in flux is about as good as my saying you're not a patriot if you don't like Buck Owens
Proving or disproving that obama did or did not save jobs is closely akin to proving tax cuts creating jobs.
Another economic illiterate
Another economic illiterate
another partisan hack looking to revise history on the basis of partial facts like most Reagan worshipers
i bought my 2nd house during those years @ 18%
and i don't even begin to go down Volker avenue with me missy, the reganista who was summarilly dismissed after resurfacing in the Obama administration by Reagan worshippers because his regulatory ideals FLEW IN THE FACE OF RR's
Proving or disproving that obama did or did not save jobs is closely akin to proving tax cuts creating jobs.
Easy Peasy.
When Reagan took office, Non-Farm employment was 91M. When he left office, it was 107M. That's a net increase of 16M jobs. And that's after enduring the increase in unemployment to cure double digit inflation.
When Obama took office, non-farm employment was 133.6M. At the end of May, 23 months after the end of the recession, the number has decreased to 131.1M - a loss of 2.5M jobs since Obama took office, and a net increase of less than 600K jobs since the official end of the recession.
The 1981-1982 recession ended in November, 1982. Over the following 23 months, the economy created 6.8 Million net new jobs.
Compare Reagans 6.8M net new jobs in 23 months with Obama's 600K jobs over 23 months.
Which number is bigger?