Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"Second American Revolution" would be a misnomer. The American Revolution was fought against a foreign colonial power who taxed us without giving us representation in their government. The target here is our own government. We're all represented in this government. What I don't understand is why these malcontents who are supposedly so dedicated to the constitution didn't talk about "revolution" during the last administration as well.
A few things he said we could all agree on but the tone and rip van winkle aspects of it amaze me. Where were these people the past eight years? Are they all far right republicans or have they all just woken from a deep sleep. Reagan/Gingrich/Bush made this nation a debtor nation, where were they then? Did we see them in the streets then or were they too busy watching Fox pretend news and cheering Jack on 24? TV reflects our dreams and Fox reflects some paranoid dreams.
On the web, in wingnut writing, wingnut radio, wingnut Fox, you see this anti-government stuff, but I never see it in real life. There are nut cases out there but hardly in the numbers one sees on the web etc. And I have seen the local cranks in center city Philly and Washington, but people walk by them and do things that normal people do. They even enjoy the sites and sounds of their government, after all it is theirs.
When Clinton was elected the wingnuts went after him and Hillary from day one. The hatred and propaganda directed at them was at a level similar to now. Clinton was elected in 95, the Oklahoma City bombing occurred in 95. The government then as now was the culprit. It would take a Don DeLillo to do justice to these strange rantings from the right, their bizarre echo chamber, and their affect on some citizens.
You got some major shit wrong in your post. Just factually. Either you're practicing selective memory or you are too young to remember so let me refresh you.
I watched to debates in 1980. If you go back and watch them too, you will be treated to Gov. Reagan taking Pres. Carter to task for creating a national debt that was so large that if it were stacked up would reach all the way to the moon. So Reagan had a head start.
Alex Jones has been around for a long time, saying the same stuff, and he's not a republican, you ignorant dillhole.
You got some major shit wrong in your post. Just factually. Either you're practicing selective memory or you are too young to remember so let me refresh you.
I watched to debates in 1980. If you go back and watch them too, you will be treated to Gov. Reagan taking Pres. Carter to task for creating a national debt that was so large that if it were stacked up would reach all the way to the moon. So Reagan had a head start.
Reagan made use a debtor nation that fact is not even debated. I give him some credit as he realized his mistake and had the largest peacetime tax increase in history. A head start is no excuse for voodoo economics and its consequences.
Alex Jones has been around for a long time, saying the same stuff, and he's not a republican, you ignorant dillhole.
Oh it's you, darn, I was going to reply with what are you talking about? But that is too far advanced beyond your insane worldview. Please remember to take your meds or get rest you need it.
You assume that your issues are the issues of the majority of the people, and they simply are not. On the other hand you make that assumption because you discount the issues of the majority of citizens as strange rantings. That comes from paying only attention to and communicating with those in your own social group or political/philosophical community of thought.
One subtle reason you don't necessarily observe what is all around you is that there is such a profound tendency by the chattering classes to ridicule that group, calling them bizarre, wingnuts, rantings, etc that they just move on and rarely publicly speak up, if they know what is good for them.
I'm saying Alex Jones has been around for a while. Which word didn't you understand?
You assume that your issues are the issues of the majority of the people, and they simply are not. On the other hand you make that assumption because you discount the issues of the majority of citizens as strange rantings. That comes from paying only attention to and communicating with those in your own social group or political/philosophical community of thought.
One subtle reason you don't necessarily observe what is all around you is that there is such a profound tendency by the chattering classes to ridicule that group, calling them bizarre, wingnuts, rantings, etc that they just move on and rarely publicly speak up, if they know what is good for them.
My issues? and you know them how? What I wonder at, is why the righties come out of the walls when a democrat is elected, and the last president pretty much screwed everything up, and until there was no way you could even hide from the screw ups, said nothing. You could call this hypocrisy or you could call it a partisanship that cares only about itself and not the health of the nation.
Not like they are now. I'm not an Obama fan or anything, but I'm bewildered by how much the lunatic fringe seems to hate him. Most of these fools weren't whining as loudly during Bush's presidency or during the tenure of any of the other constitution-trampling administrations that have been in power since 1933 and earlier. Why the sudden obsession with "revolution"?Yes they did.
You mad?You're just ignorant.
I was referring to the American Revolution. Shame on me for assuming that you'd be able to deduce that after reading the thread title and the first couple of words of my post.A revolution doesn't have to be against a foreign occupying power. You're adding things to the definition to suit your idiotic purpose.
Oh my god... this guy goes on TV in period attire?
C'mon guys... He's a joke. Send a tea-bag to our congressman? Please...
You just confirmed it for everyone to see. Your post said all anyone needs to know about your politics being the very air that you breath. Does what you said in your ref'd post sound non-partisan? Does it sound open minded? Objective? Tolerant?You assume that your issues are the issues of the majority of the people, and they simply are not. On the other hand you make that assumption because you discount the issues of the majority of citizens as strange rantings. That comes from paying only attention to and communicating with those in your own social group or political/philosophical community of thought.
One subtle reason you don't necessarily observe what is all around you is that there is such a profound tendency by the chattering classes to ridicule that group, calling them bizarre, wingnuts, rantings, etc that they just move on and rarely publicly speak up, if they know what is good for them.
My issues? and you know them how? What I wonder at, is why the righties come out of the walls when a democrat is elected, and the last president pretty much screwed everything up, and until there was no way you could even hide from the screw ups, said nothing. You could call this hypocrisy or you could call it a partisanship that cares only about itself and not the health of the nation.
You just confirmed it for everyone to see. Your post said all anyone needs to know about your politics being the very air that you breath. Does what you said in your ref'd post sound non-partisan? Does it sound open minded? Objective? Tolerant?
You just confirmed it for everyone to see. Your post said all anyone needs to know about your politics being the very air that you breath. Does what you said in your ref'd post sound non-partisan? Does it sound open minded? Objective? Tolerant?
I'm not really sure what that means, but if it means I cannot criticize the abject failures of these past thirty years then so be it. Calling a spade a spade is ok in my book. PC can be just a way to hide behind a confusing gloss on what really is happening to the working people in this nation and to the middle class. You know like 'fair and balanced' when it is anything but.
I am reminded of the Madoff case, when people criticized and called into question the ridiculous returns they were criticized, called all sorts of names, but in the end the truth and its harsh reality comes out. So I ask again, where were you guys when Bush was destroying the nation. (sorry I know that is exaggeration but.)
Personally, as a libertarian, not a member of the libertarian party, but a true liberal, not what passes for a liberal these days, I find nothing with which to disagree in this video.
A few things he said we could all agree on but the tone and rip van winkle aspects of it amaze me. Where were these people the past eight years? Are they all far right republicans or have they all just woken from a deep sleep. Reagan/Gingrich/Bush made this nation a debtor nation, where were they then? Did we see them in the streets then or were they too busy watching Fox pretend news and cheering Jack on 24? TV reflects our dreams and Fox reflects some paranoid dreams.
On the web, in wingnut writing, wingnut radio, wingnut Fox, you see this anti-government stuff, but I never see it in real life. There are nut cases out there but hardly in the numbers one sees on the web etc. And I have seen the local cranks in center city Philly and Washington, but people walk by them and do things that normal people do. They even enjoy the sites and sounds of their government, after all it is theirs.
When Clinton was elected the wingnuts went after him and Hillary from day one. The hatred and propaganda directed at them was at a level similar to now. Clinton was elected in 95, the Oklahoma City bombing occurred in 95. The government then as now was the culprit. It would take a Don DeLillo to do justice to these strange rantings from the right, their bizarre echo chamber, and their affect on some citizens.
You assume that your issues are the issues of the majority of the people, and they simply are not. On the other hand you make that assumption because you discount the issues of the majority of citizens as strange rantings. That comes from paying only attention to and communicating with those in your own social group or political/philosophical community of thought.
One subtle reason you don't necessarily observe what is all around you is that there is such a profound tendency by the chattering classes to ridicule that group, calling them bizarre, wingnuts, rantings, etc that they just move on and rarely publicly speak up, if they know what is good for them.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHJAH
what did they do to "joe" whos not named joe "the plummer" and is not a plummer?
Obama has seen this video and contacted Mr. Basso and said he was very disturbed by his and invited him to the White House. He told him not to discuss the invitation with anyone.
Sounds like a perfect thread for conspiracy theories.
