violent people should have zero access to guns.....and that includes a man or woman who are proven to be abusive in their relationship.....and an x con who was incarcerated for an act of violence.....no guns....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And pretty soon every gun owner in America will be hit with domestic abuse chargesIt is a no brainer
If you are convicted or have a domestic abuse restraining order, you should not have access to guns
“As this Court has said,” Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar began, “all too often the difference between a battered woman and a dead woman is the presence of a gun.”I am also concerned about dubious claims of domestic abuse
If the threat is real submit it to a judge and jury before you go off half cocked
it has to be proven....and if say the wife was found to be lying....then she should do some time....And pretty soon every gun owner in America will be hit with domestic abuse charges
Dems are not going to wait for due process
They - and maybe you - want cops to grab guns first and worry about due process later
Trump was wrongTrump said he supported red flag laws.
It's not surprising, since it happens so often among defenders of all things guns, that you make strawman arguments when rational ones fail you. More or less like saying background checks will lead to gun confiscation. It's moronic, and therefore effective among folks like yourself.And pretty soon every gun owner in America will be hit with domestic abuse charges
There are people that believe that the domestic abuse laws need to be looked at again. And modernized.“As this Court has said,” Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar began, “all too often the difference between a battered woman and a dead woman is the presence of a gun.”
As indicated by your posts, you really don't give a shit.
Take it before a judge and jury before taking the guns“As this Court has said,” Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar began, “all too often the difference between a battered woman and a dead woman is the presence of a gun.”
As indicated by your posts, you really don't give a shit.
The red flag laws will be abused by lib gun grabbersIt's not surprising, since it happens so often among defenders of all things guns, that you make strawman arguments when rational ones fail you. More or less like saying background checks will lead to gun confiscation. It's moronic, and therefore effective among folks like yourself.
Your desire to put domestic abuse victims at maximum risk is well established. No need for redundancy.
If they are violent enough they should not have guns, they are violent enough to take off the streets.violent people should have zero access to guns.....
And, as there court has said. there are constitutional limits on when the state can take someone's guns from the.“As this Court has said,” Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar began, “all too often the difference between a battered woman and a dead woman is the presence of a gun.”
There should be -significant- penalties for those who make false accusations - civil and criminal.Riddle me this , berg. Suppose someone loses their firearms unjustly in this kind of case. And as a result they are killed by a criminal. Should the False Complainer and judge be held for murder too?