The San Francisco BOS Declares The NRA a "Domestic Terrorist Group"

I am not a member of The NRA. Though I may or may not own firearms, I have no intention of ever joining The NRA. Furthermore, I'm not particularly fond of Wayne LaPierre, though I can't really put a finger on why...

I fully support the 2nd Amendment...

All that being said, I have to think that, given all that is wrong within the City of San Francisco, the Board of Supervisors must have better things to do than pass idiotic, misinformed, and toothless resolutions that are full of blatant lies...

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a resolution on Tuesday declaring that the National Rifle Association is a domestic terrorist organization. The officials also urged other cities, states and the federal government to follow suit.


District 2 Supervisor Catherine Stefani wrote the resolution and shared her thoughts on the NRA with KTVU. "The NRA has it coming to them," she said. "And I will do everything I possibly can to call them out on what they are, which is a domestic terrorist organization..."


SF Board of Supervisors declare National Rifle Association a domestic terrorist organization

Treat yourselves to the "Comments", some may surprise you...

The Resolution:

https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ash...amp;GUID=DF64490F-D8BC-4BF7-A43D-287F02BECCCA

View attachment 277457
View attachment 277458
View attachment 277459

The NRA is the largest marketing concern for gun manufacturers.
 
Their policy has helped arm many domestic terrorists.


Actually, you have it half ass backwards.

The NRA is against, and has always been against terrorism, domestic or otherwise.

Our Liberal Friends are becoming less and less tolerant of different opinions on issues of public import.

They are just so quick to condemn any heresy from Leftist orthodoxy as "hate" or "terror" or "worse than Hitler".

This really isn't American at all.

I can appreciate the fact that the opinion of San Fran's supervisors is that Law Abiders need to be disarmed and only the Trump Justice Department is trustworthy to have firearms. But holding the opposite opinion isn't "terrorism"
 
I am not a member of The NRA. Though I may or may not own firearms, I have no intention of ever joining The NRA. Furthermore, I'm not particularly fond of Wayne LaPierre, though I can't really put a finger on why...

I fully support the 2nd Amendment...

All that being said, I have to think that, given all that is wrong within the City of San Francisco, the Board of Supervisors must have better things to do than pass idiotic, misinformed, and toothless resolutions that are full of blatant lies...

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a resolution on Tuesday declaring that the National Rifle Association is a domestic terrorist organization. The officials also urged other cities, states and the federal government to follow suit.


District 2 Supervisor Catherine Stefani wrote the resolution and shared her thoughts on the NRA with KTVU. "The NRA has it coming to them," she said. "And I will do everything I possibly can to call them out on what they are, which is a domestic terrorist organization..."


SF Board of Supervisors declare National Rifle Association a domestic terrorist organization

Treat yourselves to the "Comments", some may surprise you...

The Resolution:

https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ash...amp;GUID=DF64490F-D8BC-4BF7-A43D-287F02BECCCA

View attachment 277457
View attachment 277458
View attachment 277459

The NRA is the largest marketing concern for gun manufacturers.

The NRA magazines are read by large number of gun buyers. Why wouldn't they be a "concern"?
 
NRA is a terrorist support group

Where ya been?
 
NRA supported the Sandy Hook Killer

Do we need any more evidence?
 
I am not a member of The NRA. Though I may or may not own firearms, I have no intention of ever joining The NRA. Furthermore, I'm not particularly fond of Wayne LaPierre, though I can't really put a finger on why...

I fully support the 2nd Amendment...

All that being said, I have to think that, given all that is wrong within the City of San Francisco, the Board of Supervisors must have better things to do than pass idiotic, misinformed, and toothless resolutions that are full of blatant lies...

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a resolution on Tuesday declaring that the National Rifle Association is a domestic terrorist organization. The officials also urged other cities, states and the federal government to follow suit.


District 2 Supervisor Catherine Stefani wrote the resolution and shared her thoughts on the NRA with KTVU. "The NRA has it coming to them," she said. "And I will do everything I possibly can to call them out on what they are, which is a domestic terrorist organization..."


SF Board of Supervisors declare National Rifle Association a domestic terrorist organization

Treat yourselves to the "Comments", some may surprise you...

The Resolution:

https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ash...amp;GUID=DF64490F-D8BC-4BF7-A43D-287F02BECCCA

View attachment 277457
View attachment 277458
View attachment 277459

The NRA is the largest marketing concern for gun manufacturers.

So what's wrong with that?
 
I am not a member of The NRA. Though I may or may not own firearms, I have no intention of ever joining The NRA. Furthermore, I'm not particularly fond of Wayne LaPierre, though I can't really put a finger on why...

I fully support the 2nd Amendment...

All that being said, I have to think that, given all that is wrong within the City of San Francisco, the Board of Supervisors must have better things to do than pass idiotic, misinformed, and toothless resolutions that are full of blatant lies...

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a resolution on Tuesday declaring that the National Rifle Association is a domestic terrorist organization. The officials also urged other cities, states and the federal government to follow suit.


District 2 Supervisor Catherine Stefani wrote the resolution and shared her thoughts on the NRA with KTVU. "The NRA has it coming to them," she said. "And I will do everything I possibly can to call them out on what they are, which is a domestic terrorist organization..."


SF Board of Supervisors declare National Rifle Association a domestic terrorist organization

Treat yourselves to the "Comments", some may surprise you...

The Resolution:

https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ash...amp;GUID=DF64490F-D8BC-4BF7-A43D-287F02BECCCA

View attachment 277457
View attachment 277458
View attachment 277459

The way our country is arranged is small states forming a union. When new ideas arise, many times we try them out in states first before implementing those ideas on the entire country.

California is a perfect example of why we DON'T want these very same people running our federal government. Because if there is anybody or anything that can be labeled for domestic terrorism, it's sanctuary cities.
 
California is a perfect example of why we DON'T want these very same people running our federal government. Because if there is anybody or anything that can be labeled for domestic terrorism, it's sanctuary cities.

Really? Who are these very same people? I didn't realize the San Francisco Board of Supervisors was running for president. Are you attempting to smear all liberals? That would be like me thinking all conservatives are mentally ill because some of them take the bible literally word for word. Would that be fair?

Now as far as the NRA goes. They aren't a domestic terrorist group. They are corrupt and they are nothing more than a lobbying firm for firearms manufactures who have cashed in a reputation built long before it's current leadership was in place to defend those gun makers bottom line.
 
Okay, this really is getting dumb.

MORE dumb.

EXTRA dumb.

"Even dumber" is certainly on the way, though.
.


It is San Francisco...

It was once a really nice place to spend a weekend. I spent a few there back in the late '80s, early '90s. Nowadays, I wouldn't go there on a bet. Damn shame...
I grew up in the Bay Area. San Francisco was the best place on the freakin' planet for a first date.

It's very different now, sadly.
.

Best place for a first date? You must have been bisexual because the only advantage SF has is that it doubles your chance of getting a date!
 
I am not a member of The NRA. Though I may or may not own firearms, I have no intention of ever joining The NRA. Furthermore, I'm not particularly fond of Wayne LaPierre, though I can't really put a finger on why...

I fully support the 2nd Amendment...

All that being said, I have to think that, given all that is wrong within the City of San Francisco, the Board of Supervisors must have better things to do than pass idiotic, misinformed, and toothless resolutions that are full of blatant lies...

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed a resolution on Tuesday declaring that the National Rifle Association is a domestic terrorist organization. The officials also urged other cities, states and the federal government to follow suit.


District 2 Supervisor Catherine Stefani wrote the resolution and shared her thoughts on the NRA with KTVU. "The NRA has it coming to them," she said. "And I will do everything I possibly can to call them out on what they are, which is a domestic terrorist organization..."


SF Board of Supervisors declare National Rifle Association a domestic terrorist organization

Treat yourselves to the "Comments", some may surprise you...

The Resolution:

https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ash...amp;GUID=DF64490F-D8BC-4BF7-A43D-287F02BECCCA

View attachment 277457
View attachment 277458
View attachment 277459

The NRA is the largest marketing concern for gun manufacturers.

So? Since when is taking advertising in your magazine illegal?
 
They're far from being terrorists. They're just a bunch of fucking idiots. But definitely not terrorists.
We have the right to be idiots. Hell, we even have the right to be Democrats. Woo.
 
Here is the link to the FULL TEXT of the original Resolution by SF Board of Supervisors:
https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ash...amp;GUID=DF64490F-D8BC-4BF7-A43D-287F02BECCCA


Below is the rough first draft of my

CONSTITUTIONALIST RESPONSE
TO FILE NO. 190841 RESOLUTION


[Declaring the National Rifle Association as a Domestic Terrorist Organization]

======================================

In Response to the San Francisco Board of Supervisor's published Resolution,
the Undersigned unite in publicly recognizing that the Democratic Party and its platforms
constitute a Political Religion, including Socialist beliefs in using Government
to require public taxpayers and private citizens to fund and follow its political beliefs by law
and mandates in violation of U.S. Constitutional rights and liberties, laws and protections.

In recognizing the Unconstitutional abuse of Government by Democratic Party leaders and followers to establish Socialist and Statist beliefs, we call for Mayors, Senators, and Governors across Districts, Cities, Counties, and States to recognize the same.

For the sake of protecting equal religious freedom of all people and parties to practice their own Political Beliefs, without disparaging the rights of others to the same, we call on Congress to revise the U.S. Tax Codes to recognize Political Parties as other Religious Organizations that retain rights to develop their own programs, financing, and terms of benefits voluntarily and democratically through their membership bases, while barring Political Parties from establishing Political Beliefs and Religion through Government against the will, beliefs and consent of other citizens, in violation of First and Fourteenth Amendments rights, and Civil Rights Protections against Discrimination by Creed.

Should Parties continue violating equal civil rights of public taxpayers, by abusing Government to impose policies depriving citizens of due process and liberty to dissent or defund programs violating their conscience and beliefs, we demand to prosecute this conspiracy to violate civil rights as a felony.

Because of the high cost to taxpayers of Unconstitutional abuses of Government to impose illegitimate policies and programs, contested due to conflicting beliefs which the Government cannot compel citizens to change or fund against their free choice, we further demand Reparations to the public from the Party's financial supporters – whereby taxpayers are owed reimbursed for the costs, debts and damages for such policies and programs in violation of Constitutional limits and process.

We ask that full credits owed to the American public be assessed and collected from Wrongdoers, including legal and administrative costs, and invested in financing Government reforms to correct these violations without further cost or damage to the taxpayers and citizens wronged by the abuses.

============================

ADDENDUM



Given the following contested political beliefs, subjecting to public and federal legislation the personal rights and liberties historically reserved to people and states, we the Undersigned urge other cities, states, and the federal government to recognize the Democratic Party Platform as a Political Religion, including the faith-based Belief in using Government to establish socialized regulation of the otherwise free individual choice of health care, education, marriage, abortion, sexual identity and political and religious belief, and to work with all levels of government to separate taxes and terms of social programs to guarantee to all citizens free choice of funding, defunding, and democratic representation.



1. The Political Belief that health care is a right through Government, as opposed to (a) the belief

that health involves spiritual and personal choices, which Government is not designed to regulate or manage for diverse individuals, and (b) cooperative health care for developing locally managed universal care, without compromising Constitutional rights and beliefs in free choice, but complying with the Code of Ethics for Government Service by adopting the most economic and efficient model.



2. The Faith-based Belief that internal sexual orientation or identity constitutes a class of individuals, as opposed to (a) the belief that these are a matter of spiritual or personal free choice of beliefs, which Government is not designed to regulate, establish, or penalize; (b) the proven distinctions in physical gender using karotypes traditionally used for legal definitions based on physical genetics; and (c) the equal treatment of LGBT beliefs in identity, orientation, and class as any other faith-based beliefs that Government cannot either establish or prohibit without violating Constitutional laws and limits.



3. The Belief in Government as the central authority for managing social benefits, as opposed to the proposed system of taxpayer choice of directing funds and tax deductions toward the Parties they elect, similar to free choice of Religious Organizations, to manage terms of benefits and funding democratically for their own voluntary membership, while allowing all others the same freedom, so that people of all Creeds enjoy equal rights, exercise, and protections of their beliefs from infringement.



4. Electoral College and School District Reform.

5. Global Warming as opposed to focus on conservation and restoration.

6. Law Enforcement, Immigration and Prison Reform.

To be continued...
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top