Soggy in NOLA
Diamond Member
- Jul 31, 2009
- 40,565
- 5,359
- 1,830
there are times to be frugal.
during an historic downturn is not one of them and the history of the world proves it.
Must have ham sandwich! Must have ham sandwich!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
there are times to be frugal.
during an historic downturn is not one of them and the history of the world proves it.
wow the level of your devotion to historically failed ideas is borderline insanity
Conservative said:your source said 173 instances, and listed a number of different countries.
YOU, on the other hand, are claiming that all 173 instances are in the US, and are Republican. I know you're a little slow, but do you see the difference between what your source says, and what you are claiming?
Again, please list all 173, US and Republican instances.
No that is not what I said.
I said your ideas have been proven to have failed by history its self.
Then I gave you cold hard proof that austerity does not work.
Please be specific. Show us which of the 173 WORLD-WIDE instances being discussed apply to the United States, and specifically to Republicans.
They all apply to the US and the US is one of the countries listed.
the fact that we have always spent and never cut back in the last 80 years means that tm failed progressive ideas have killed the economy... So she tries to pawn it all off on something we have not done for a long time. Tm is a obama-bot, it's all about shifting blame from you to someone else.
the fact that we have always spent and never cut back in the last 80 years means that tm failed progressive ideas have killed the economy... So she tries to pawn it all off on something we have not done for a long time. Tm is a obama-bot, it's all about shifting blame from you to someone else.
why does tm ignore the preponderance of evidence?
Conservative said:your source said 173 instances, and listed a number of different countries.
YOU, on the other hand, are claiming that all 173 instances are in the US, and are Republican. I know you're a little slow, but do you see the difference between what your source says, and what you are claiming?
Again, please list all 173, US and Republican instances.
No that is not what I said.
I said your ideas have been proven to have failed by history its self.
Then I gave you cold hard proof that austerity does not work.
Really?
I said...
Please be specific. Show us which of the 173 WORLD-WIDE instances being discussed apply to the United States, and specifically to Republicans.
you said...
They all apply to the US and the US is one of the countries listed.
last time I checked, the words 'ALL APPLY' in that sentence meant you were talking about ALL 173 instances.
So, essentially, you're still full of FAIL, dick-stain.
Time to run away like you usually do and start yet another thread on the same subject, hoping you don't get your ass kicked in that one like you did here.
This is how the right acts when their ideas are proven to be complete failures.
They laugh and retain the historically failed ideas
I have supplied you with a study that outlined the evidence and your ideas failed the test.
I supplied you a preponderance of the evidence that shows your ideas failed.
I have supplied you with a study that outlined the evidence and your ideas failed the test.
I supplied you a preponderance of the evidence that shows your ideas failed.
You falsely claimed 173 instances of Republican austerity measures in the study.
The study says differently.
You deny what the study says.
You negate your own source.
Proving once again, what a complete and utter imbecile you are.
economic failure allows the rich to buy up the American dream
So you are claiming we are some vortex of economic reality and NOTHING can be learned from other countries in the feild of economic theory?