Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think it was foolish of Obama to push his big government plans through before addressing the financial crisis. Shouldn't that have been his first priority?
President Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from harvard, meaning he was in the top 10% of his class.
President Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from harvard, meaning he was in the top 10% of his class.
Bush has an MBA from Harvard, what's your point?
President Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from harvard, meaning he was in the top 10% of his class.
Bush has an MBA from Harvard, what's your point?
so does Obama's, when you take away his teleprompterPresident Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from harvard, meaning he was in the top 10% of his class.
Bush has an MBA from Harvard, what's your point?
And his speechs reflected that fact.
so does Obama's, when you take away his teleprompterBush has an MBA from Harvard, what's your point?
And his speechs reflected that fact.
I actually believe that Obama has very little intellectual curiosity beyond his own immiediate and ongoing autobiography. He is not nearly so bright as was portrayed over and over again by the media. In fact, I am convinced that this portrayal by the media is yet another example of its inherent racist bias. It was a reaction to a man of color with the ability to give a speech, devoid of the race-baiting anger that has been so common in the black leadership voices of the last 30 years, that created white members of the media to fall over themselves in praise of this "brilliant" politician. A true accounting of Obama's actual message though shows platitudes and broad generalizations, devoid of substance, and the very possible fact of a mind and/or personality incapable of forming such substance.
That being said, Obama has shown a decided change in message of late - a far more pro-business, tax cut, economically sound message. Clearly someone reached the President and convinced him such a change was in order - and Obama, ever watchful of his created self-image, appeared quite responsive.
I actually believe that Obama has very little intellectual curiosity beyond his own immiediate and ongoing autobiography. He is not nearly so bright as was portrayed over and over again by the media. In fact, I am convinced that this portrayal by the media is yet another example of its inherent racist bias. It was a reaction to a man of color with the ability to give a speech, devoid of the race-baiting anger that has been so common in the black leadership voices of the last 30 years, that created white members of the media to fall over themselves in praise of this "brilliant" politician. A true accounting of Obama's actual message though shows platitudes and broad generalizations, devoid of substance, and the very possible fact of a mind and/or personality incapable of forming such substance.
That being said, Obama has shown a decided change in message of late - a far more pro-business, tax cut, economically sound message. Clearly someone reached the President and convinced him such a change was in order - and Obama, ever watchful of his created self-image, appeared quite responsive.
It's becoming apparent that this adminstration has no clue as to what is going on, & or how to fix it. AIG & these new bonuse's are on Geithners watch--this after all the complaining over Wall Street's bonuses! Geithner still is completely understaffed by 17 people. I imagine it's because there are not 17 people in this country that can figure out this mess either.
But, as far as your point. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Nancy Pelosi has written all these spending bills. In fact, I doubt that Barack Obama has had time or the care to actually read the first 787 billion dollar stimulus bill. He kept stating that there were no earmarks in it--later we find out that 1/3 of this bill is not for economic stimulus but in fact all earmarks. Then Obama rails about ear-marks & 20 minutes later signs the Ominus bill that is loaded with more than 9000 earmarks--from both republicans & democrat "gimme those taxpayer dollars for my pet projects." Obama had no problem with signing that bill. He could have easily vetoed the bill--but instead chose to hide behind the claim that it was last years bill--even though the money is to be spent this year.
It this wasn't so serious--it would be laughable. Dick Morris--Bill Clinton's old campaign manager referred to Barack Obama as a socialist tonight--& then added that he kindly cannot even call him a good socialist, ha.ha. He's not even good at that.
I think we have elected a good speech giver. I don't give him a lot of credit for "know-how" or hands on management of a crisis. He is a person who can convince people who do not pay much attention to the politics--or have no clue as to how the economy works-- to follow him. Kind of like sheep to the slaughter.
President Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from harvard, meaning he was in the top 10% of his class.
I actually believe that Obama has very little intellectual curiosity beyond his own immiediate and ongoing autobiography. He is not nearly so bright as was portrayed over and over again by the media. In fact, I am convinced that this portrayal by the media is yet another example of its inherent racist bias. It was a reaction to a man of color with the ability to give a speech, devoid of the race-baiting anger that has been so common in the black leadership voices of the last 30 years, that created white members of the media to fall over themselves in praise of this "brilliant" politician. A true accounting of Obama's actual message though shows platitudes and broad generalizations, devoid of substance, and the very possible fact of a mind and/or personality incapable of forming such substance.
That being said, Obama has shown a decided change in message of late - a far more pro-business, tax cut, economically sound message. Clearly someone reached the President and convinced him such a change was in order - and Obama, ever watchful of his created self-image, appeared quite responsive.
It's becoming apparent that this adminstration has no clue as to what is going on, & or how to fix it. AIG & these new bonuse's are on Geithners watch--this after all the complaining over Wall Street's bonuses! Geithner still is completely understaffed by 17 people. I imagine it's because there are not 17 people in this country that can figure out this mess either.
But, as far as your point. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Nancy Pelosi has written all these spending bills. In fact, I doubt that Barack Obama has had time or the care to actually read the first 787 billion dollar stimulus bill. He kept stating that there were no earmarks in it--later we find out that 1/3 of this bill is not for economic stimulus but in fact all earmarks. Then Obama rails about ear-marks & 20 minutes later signs the Ominus bill that is loaded with more than 9000 earmarks--from both republicans & democrat "gimme those taxpayer dollars for my pet projects." Obama had no problem with signing that bill. He could have easily vetoed the bill--but instead chose to hide behind the claim that it was last years bill--even though the money is to be spent this year.
It this wasn't so serious--it would be laughable. Dick Morris--Bill Clinton's old campaign manager referred to Barack Obama as a socialist tonight--& then added that he kindly cannot even call him a good socialist, ha.ha. He's not even good at that.
I think we have elected a good speech giver. I don't give him a lot of credit for "know-how" or hands on management of a crisis. He is a person who can convince people who do not pay much attention to the politics--or have no clue as to how the economy works-- to follow him. Kind of like sheep to the slaughter.
my question is how long will the dems continue to be partisan and completely blame Bush for this?
Hell, not even Carter blamed things on the previous adminIt's becoming apparent that this adminstration has no clue as to what is going on, & or how to fix it. AIG & these new bonuse's are on Geithners watch--this after all the complaining over Wall Street's bonuses! Geithner still is completely understaffed by 17 people. I imagine it's because there are not 17 people in this country that can figure out this mess either.
But, as far as your point. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Nancy Pelosi has written all these spending bills. In fact, I doubt that Barack Obama has had time or the care to actually read the first 787 billion dollar stimulus bill. He kept stating that there were no earmarks in it--later we find out that 1/3 of this bill is not for economic stimulus but in fact all earmarks. Then Obama rails about ear-marks & 20 minutes later signs the Ominus bill that is loaded with more than 9000 earmarks--from both republicans & democrat "gimme those taxpayer dollars for my pet projects." Obama had no problem with signing that bill. He could have easily vetoed the bill--but instead chose to hide behind the claim that it was last years bill--even though the money is to be spent this year.
It this wasn't so serious--it would be laughable. Dick Morris--Bill Clinton's old campaign manager referred to Barack Obama as a socialist tonight--& then added that he kindly cannot even call him a good socialist, ha.ha. He's not even good at that.
I think we have elected a good speech giver. I don't give him a lot of credit for "know-how" or hands on management of a crisis. He is a person who can convince people who do not pay much attention to the politics--or have no clue as to how the economy works-- to follow him. Kind of like sheep to the slaughter.
my question is how long will the dems continue to be partisan and completely blame Bush for this?
You're kidding right. "I inherited this." How many times have we heard this comment from Barack Obama or people within his administration.
Yes Barack Obama we know you inheritied this. But President Bush inherited a recession also. Reagan inherited a recession that was worse than this one. Did they blame the preciding President, or continually mention it.? NO. In fact, never once did they mention it, they took it on & dealt with it.
This President is much different than past Presidents, & I am not giving Barack Obama a compliment when I say that.
Oh my goodness...the DNC is taking advantage of their position of power!
Whoda thunk they would do that?
I know I'm totally shocked.
Obama's dark skin quite likely played a far larger role in his approval to enter both Harvard and Chicago Law, than did his actual academic performance.
Unless you have proof for that statement you are bigotted blowhard.
naw, i think thats taking it a bit too farOh my goodness...the DNC is taking advantage of their position of power!
Whoda thunk they would do that?
I know I'm totally shocked.
And yet you pretend not to care. Any politician that would use a current economic or social condition to better their position with the public should be put to death for treason.
naw, i think thats taking it a bit too farOh my goodness...the DNC is taking advantage of their position of power!
Whoda thunk they would do that?
I know I'm totally shocked.
And yet you pretend not to care. Any politician that would use a current economic or social condition to better their position with the public should be put to death for treason.
maybe they shouldnt be re-elected
I actually believe that Obama has very little intellectual curiosity beyond his own immiediate and ongoing autobiography. He is not nearly so bright as was portrayed over and over again by the media. In fact, I am convinced that this portrayal by the media is yet another example of its inherent racist bias. It was a reaction to a man of color with the ability to give a speech, devoid of the race-baiting anger that has been so common in the black leadership voices of the last 30 years, that created white members of the media to fall over themselves in praise of this "brilliant" politician. A true accounting of Obama's actual message though shows platitudes and broad generalizations, devoid of substance, and the very possible fact of a mind and/or personality incapable of forming such substance.
That being said, Obama has shown a decided change in message of late - a far more pro-business, tax cut, economically sound message. Clearly someone reached the President and convinced him such a change was in order - and Obama, ever watchful of his created self-image, appeared quite responsive.
That's right, no one who worked their way through Harvard Law School and rose to become Head of the Harvard Law Review could be very smart. Besides what could being a Constitutional Law Professor qualify one for other than being an expert on how the Framers intended the government to work...
Oh my goodness...the DNC is taking advantage of their position of power!
Whoda thunk they would do that?
I know I'm totally shocked.
And yet you pretend not to care. Any politician that would use a current economic or social condition to better their position with the public should be put to death for treason.
